Learning Sparse Coalitions via Bayesian Pursuit and $ ell_1$ Relaxation

Reading time: 3 minute
...

📝 Original Paper Info

- Title: Sparse Probabilistic Coalition Structure Generation Bayesian Greedy Pursuit and $ ell_1$ Relaxations
- ArXiv ID: 2601.00329
- Date: 2026-01-01
- Authors: Angshul Majumdar

📝 Abstract

We study coalition structure generation (CSG) when coalition values are not given but must be learned from episodic observations. We model each episode as a sparse linear regression problem, where the realised payoff \(Y_t\) is a noisy linear combination of a small number of coalition contributions. This yields a probabilistic CSG framework in which the planner first estimates a sparse value function from \(T\) episodes, then runs a CSG solver on the inferred coalition set. We analyse two estimation schemes. The first, Bayesian Greedy Coalition Pursuit (BGCP), is a greedy procedure that mimics orthogonal matching pursuit. Under a coherence condition and a minimum signal assumption, BGCP recovers the true set of profitable coalitions with high probability once \(T \gtrsim K \log m\), and hence yields welfare-optimal structures. The second scheme uses an \(\ell_1\)-penalised estimator; under a restricted eigenvalue condition, we derive \(\ell_1\) and prediction error bounds and translate them into welfare gap guarantees. We compare both methods to probabilistic baselines and identify regimes where sparse probabilistic CSG is superior, as well as dense regimes where classical least-squares approaches are competitive.

💡 Summary & Analysis

1. **Key Contribution 1**: This study systematically compares and analyzes the performance of deep learning models across various datasets, much like different chefs trying out distinct recipes with the same ingredients. 2. **Key Contribution 2**: The paper examines three major CNN paradigms (custom model, transfer learning, ensemble), similar to comparing types of cars where each excels in particular situations. 3. **Key Contribution 3**: It systematically evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each model, suggesting optimized learning methods akin to finding the most effective exercise routine for an individual.

📄 Full Paper Content (ArXiv Source)

1. **Key Contribution 1**: This study systematically compares and analyzes the performance of deep learning models across various datasets, much like different chefs trying out distinct recipes with the same ingredients. 2. **Key Contribution 2**: The paper examines three major CNN paradigms (custom model, transfer learning, ensemble), similar to comparing types of cars where each excels in particular situations. 3. **Key Contribution 3**: It systematically evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each model, suggesting optimized learning methods akin to finding the most effective exercise routine for an individual.

📊 논문 시각자료 (Figures)

Figure 1



A Note of Gratitude

The copyright of this content belongs to the respective researchers. We deeply appreciate their hard work and contribution to the advancement of human civilization.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut