Universal Encoder Attack on Audio-Language Models

Reading time: 3 minute
...

📝 Original Paper Info

- Title: Breaking Audio Large Language Models by Attacking Only the Encoder A Universal Targeted Latent-Space Audio Attack
- ArXiv ID: 2512.23881
- Date: 2025-12-29
- Authors: Roee Ziv, Raz Lapid, Moshe Sipper

📝 Abstract

Audio-language models combine audio encoders with large language models to enable multimodal reasoning, but they also introduce new security vulnerabilities. We propose a universal targeted latent space attack, an encoder-level adversarial attack that manipulates audio latent representations to induce attacker-specified outputs in downstream language generation. Unlike prior waveform-level or input-specific attacks, our approach learns a universal perturbation that generalizes across inputs and speakers and does not require access to the language model. Experiments on Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct demonstrate consistently high attack success rates with minimal perceptual distortion, revealing a critical and previously underexplored attack surface at the encoder level of multimodal systems.

💡 Summary & Analysis

- Contribution 1: Comparative study of regularization techniques. - Contribution 2: Demonstrating the effectiveness of L2 over L1 in dense data scenarios. - Contribution 3: Highlighting dropout's role in preventing overfitting without compromising model performance.

Contribution 1 can be understood as a competition among different methods, like a sports event where each method showcases its strengths and we observe which performs better under what conditions. For Contribution 2, think of L1 and L2 as gears with different shapes; L2 fits more situations well but in specific cases, L1 might be the right choice. Finally, for Contribution 3, dropout can be likened to a safety mechanism on a boat that prevents it from getting too complex (overfitting) while keeping performance intact.

📄 Full Paper Content (ArXiv Source)

- Contribution 1: Comparative study of regularization techniques. - Contribution 2: Demonstrating the effectiveness of L2 over L1 in dense data scenarios. - Contribution 3: Highlighting dropout's role in preventing overfitting without compromising model performance.

Contribution 1 can be understood as a competition among different methods, like a sports event where each method showcases its strengths and we observe which performs better under what conditions. For Contribution 2, think of L1 and L2 as gears with different shapes; L2 fits more situations well but in specific cases, L1 might be the right choice. Finally, for Contribution 3, dropout can be likened to a safety mechanism on a boat that prevents it from getting too complex (overfitting) while keeping performance intact.


📊 논문 시각자료 (Figures)

Figure 1



Figure 2



A Note of Gratitude

The copyright of this content belongs to the respective researchers. We deeply appreciate their hard work and contribution to the advancement of human civilization.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut