Computer Science / Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science / Cryptography and Security
Computer Science / Machine Learning
Mathematics / math.LO
Statistics / Machine Learning
Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension
Reading time: 1 minute
...
📝 Original Info
- Title: Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimension
- ArXiv ID: 1806.00949
- Date: 2019-03-11
- Authors: Noga Alon and Roi Livni and Maryanthe Malliaris and Shay Moran
📝 Abstract
We show that every approximately differentially private learning algorithm (possibly improper) for a class $H$ with Littlestone dimension~$d$ requires $\Omega\bigl(\log^*(d)\bigr)$ examples. As a corollary it follows that the class of thresholds over $\mathbb{N}$ can not be learned in a private manner; this resolves open question due to [Bun et al., 2015, Feldman and Xiao, 2015]. We leave as an open question whether every class with a finite Littlestone dimension can be learned by an approximately differentially private algorithm.📄 Full Content
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.