Common subspaces of Lp-spaces
논문에서는 레비 표현을 이용하여 Banach 공간의 이스омет리 클래스를 분류하는 데 활용할 수 있는 새로운 방법론을 제안한다. 특히, 레비 표현을 이용하여 Banach 공간이 L^p 공간에 이스옴터믹한지 여부를 결정할 수 있는 방법을 설명하고 있다.
또한, 논문에서는 레비 표현을 사용하여 Banach 공간의 정의함수를 분석하는 데 활용할 수 있는 새로운 기법을 제안한다. 특히, 레비 표현을 이용하여 Banach 공간의 정의함수가 L^p 함수에 이스옴터믹한지 여부를 결정할 수 있는 방법을 설명하고 있다.
논문에서는 이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 Banach 공간과 레비 표현에 관한 새로운 이론적 기법을 제시하고 있다. 특히, 레비 표현을 이용하여 Banach 공간의 성질을 분석하는 데 활용할 수 있는 새로운 방법론을 제안하고 있으며, 레비 표현을 사용하여 Banach 공간의 정의함수를 분석하는 데 활용할 수 있는 새로운 기법도 제시하고 있다.
결과적으로, 논문은 Banach 공간과 레비 표현에 관한 연구를 바탕으로 새로운 이론적 기법을 제시하며, 이러한 연구 결과는 Banach 공간과 관련된 많은 문제에 대한 해결책을 제공할 것으로 기대된다.
Common subspaces of Lp-spaces
arXiv:math/9211209v1 [math.FA] 5 Nov 1992Common subspaces of Lp-spacesAlexander KoldobskyDepartment of MathematicsUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia, MO 65211Abstract. For n ≥2, p < 2 and q > 2, does there exist an n-dimensional Banach spacedifferent from Hilbert spaces which is isometric to subspaces of both Lp and Lq?
Generaliz-ing the construction from the paper ”Zonoids whose polars are zonoids” by R.Schneider wegive examples of such spaces. Moreover, for any compact subset Q of (0, ∞)\{2k, k ∈N},we can construct a space isometric to subspaces of Lq for all q ∈Q simultaneously.AMS classification: Primary 46B04, Secondary 46E30Key words: isometries, positive definite functions, spherical harmonics.e-mail: mathak@mizzou1.missouri.edui
Common subspaces of Lp-spacesAlexander KoldobskyDepartment of MathematicsUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia, MO 652111. Introduction.This work started with the following question: For given n ≥2, p ∈(0, 2) and q > 2,does there exist an n-dimensional Banach space which is different from Hilbert spaces andwhich is isometric to subspaces of both Lp and Lq?It is a well-known fact first noticed by P.Levy that Hilbert spaces are isometric tosubspaces of Lq for all q > 0.
On the other hand, it was proved in [4] that, for n ≥3, q >2, p > 0, the function exp(−∥x∥pq) is not positive definite where ∥x∥q = (|x1|q+...+|xn|q)1/q. (This result gave an answer to a question posed by I.J.Schoenberg [10] in 1938) In 1966,J.Bretagnolle, D.Dacunha-Castelle and J.L.Krivine [1] proved that,for 0 < p < 2, a space(E, ∥· ∥) is isometric to a subspace of Lp if and only if the function exp(−∥x∥p) is positivedefinite.
Thus, in the language of isometries, the above mentioned result from [4] meansthat, for every n ≥3, q > 2, p ∈(0, 2), the space lqn is not isometric to a subspace ofLp. (For p ≥1, this fact was first proved in [2]) The initial purpose of this work was to finda non-Hilbertian subspace (E, ∥· ∥) of Lq with q > 2 of the dimension at least 3 such thatthe function exp(−∥x∥p) is positive definite.
The latter problem is equivalent to that atthe beginning of the paper.We prove, however, a more general fact: For every n ≥2 and every compact subset Qof (0, ∞) \ {2k, k ∈N}, there exists an n-dimensional Banach space different from Hilbertspaces which is isometric to subspaces of Lq for all q ∈Q simultaneously.In 1975, R.Schneider [9] proved that there exist non-trivial zonoids whose polars arezonoids or, in other words, there exist non-Hilbertian Banach spaces X such that X andX∗are isometric to subspaces of L1. It turns out that Schneider’s construction of specialsubspaces of L1 can be extended to all numbers q > 0 which are not even integers and inthis way we obtain our main result.1
2. Some properties of spherical harmonics.We start with some properties of spherical harmonics (see [6] for details).Let Pm denote the space of sperical harmonics of degree m on the unit sphere Ωn inRn.
Remind that sperical harmonics of degree m are restrictions to the sphere of harmonichomogeneous polynomials of degree m. We consider spherical harmonics as functions fromthe space L2(Ωn). Any two spherical harmonics of different degrees are orthogonal inL2(Ωn) [6, p.2]The dimension N(n, m) of the space Pm can easily be calculated [6, p.4]:(1)N(n, m) = (2m + n −2)Γ(n + m −2)Γ(m + 1)Γ(n −1)Let {Ymj : j = 1, ..., N(n, m)} be an orthonormal basis of the space Pm.
By theAddition Theorem [ 6, p.9], for every x ∈Ωn,(2)N(n,m)Xj=1Y 2mj(x) = N(n, m)ωnwhere ωn = 2πn/2/Γ(n/2) is the surface of the sphere Ωn.Linear combinations of functions Ymj are dense in the space L2(Ωn) [ 6, p.43]. There-fore, if F is a continuous function on Ωn and (F, Ymj) = 0 for every m = 0, 1, 2, ... andevery j = 1, ....N(n, m) then F ≡0 on Ωn.
Here (F, Y ) stands for the scalar product inL2(Ωn).Let ∆be the Laplace-Beltrami operator on the sphere Ωn. Then for every Ym ∈Pmwe have [ 6, p.39](3)∆Ym + m(m + n −2)Ym ≡0An immediate consequence of (3) ( and a well-known fact) is that ∆is a symmetricoperator and we can aplly Green’s formula: for every function H from the class C2r, r ∈Nof functions on Ωn having continuous partial derivatives of order 2r and for every Ym ∈Pm, m ≥1,(4)(−m(m + n −2))r(H, Ym) = (H, ∆rYm) = (∆rH, Ym)We also need the Funk-Henke formula [ 6, p.20]:for every Ym ∈Pm, every continuousfunction f on [−1, 1] and every x ∈Ωn,(5)ZΩnf(⟨x, ξ⟩)Ym(ξ)dξ = λmYm(x)where ⟨·, ·⟩stands for the scalar product in Rn and(6)λm =(−1)mπ(n−1)/22m−1Γ(m + (n −1)/2)Z 1−1f(t) dmdtm (1 −t2)m+(n−3)/2dtLet us calculate λm in the case where f(t) = |t|q, q > 0.2
Lemma 1. If q > 0, q ̸= 2k, k ∈N and f(t) = |t|q then(7)λm = πn/2−1Γ(q + 1) sin(π(m −q)/2)Γ((m −q)/2)2q−1Γ((m + n + q)/2)Proof: Assume first that q > m and calculate the integral from (6) by parts m times.Then use the formulaR 1−1 t2α−1(1 −t2)β−1dt = Γ(α)Γ(β)/Γ(α + β) and formulas for Γ-function: Γ(2x) = 22x−1Γ(x)Γ(x + 1/2)/π1/2 and Γ(1 −x)Γ(x) = π/ sin(πx).
We get(7) for q > m. Note that both sides of (7) are analytic functions of q in the domainℜq > 0, q ̸= 2k, k ∈N. Because of the uniqueness of analytic extension, (7) holds for everyq from this domain.
We are done.3. Main result.Let X be an n-dimensional subspace of Lq = Lq([0, 1]) with q > 0.
Let f1, ..., fn bea basis in X and µ be the joint distribution of the functions f1, ..., fn with respect toLebesgue measure (µ is a finite measure on Rn). Then, for every x ∈Rn,(11) ∥x∥q = ∥nXk=1xkfk∥q =Z 10|nXk=1xkfk(t)|qdt =ZRn |⟨x, ξ⟩|qdµ(ξ) =ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|qdν(ξ)where ν is the projection of µ to the sphere.
(For every Borel subset A of Ωn, ν(A) =R{tA,t∈R} ∥x∥q2dµ(x)) The representation (11) of the norm is usially called the Levy repre-sentation. It is clear now that a norm in an n-dimensional Banach space admits the Levyrepresentation with a probability measure on the sphere if and only if this space is isomet-ric to a subspace of Lq.
(Given the Levy representation we can choose functions f1, ..., fnon [0, 1] with the joint distribution ν and define an isometry by x →Pnk=1 xkfk, x ∈Rn)If we replace the measure ν by an arbitrary continuous (not necessarily non-negative)function on the sphere then a representation similar to the Levy representation is possiblefor a large class of Banach spaces (see [5] for the Levy representation with distributionsinstead of measures; such representation is possible for any Banach space and any q whichis not an even integer) This is an idea going back to W.Blaschke that any smooth enoughfunction on the sphere can be represented in the form (11) with a continuous functioninstead of a measure on the sphere. However, W.Blaschke and then R.Schneider [8] re-stricted themselves to the case q = 1 which is particularly important in the theory ofconvex bodies.
The following theorem is an extension of R.Schneider’s results from [ 8,p.77] and [ 9, p.367] to all positive numbers q which are not even integersTheorem 1. Let q > 0, q ̸= 2k, k ∈N and let H be an even function of the class C2r onΩn where r ∈N and 2r > n + q.
Then there exists a continuous function bH on the sphere3
Ωn such that, for every x ∈Ωn,(8)H(x) =ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|qbH(ξ)dξBesides that, there exist constants K(q) and L(q) depending on n and q only such that,for every x ∈Ωn,(9)|bH(x)| ≤K(q)∥H∥L2(Ωn) + L(q)∥∆2rH∥L2(Ωn)Proof: Define a function bH on Ωn by(10)bH(x) =∞Xm=0λ−1mN(n,m)Xj=1(N, Ymj)Ymj(x)Since H is an even function and Ymj are odd functions if m is odd the sum is, actually,taken over even integers m only.Let us prove that the series in the right-hand side of (10) converges uniformly on Ωn.By the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality, (2) and the fact that Ymj form an orthonormal basisin Pm, we get|N(n,m)Xj=1(∆rN, Ymj)Ymj(x)| ≤(N(n,m)Xj=1(∆rN, Ymj)2)1/2(N(n,m)Xj=1Y 2mj(x))1/2≤∥∆rH∥L2(Ωn)N(n, m)ωn1/2It follows from (4) and the latter inequality that|bH(x)| ≤|λ−10 (H, Y0)Y0(x)| +∞Xm=2;2|mλ−1m (−1m(m + n −2))r|N(n,m)Xj=1(∆rH, Ymj)Ymj(x)| ≤|λ0|−1ω−1/2n∥H∥L2(Ωn) +∞Xm=2;2|mλ−1m m−2rN(n, m)ωn1/2∥∆rH∥L2(Ωn)Let us show that the series P∞m=2;2|m λ−1m m−2r(N(n, m)/ωn)1/2 converges.In fact, itfollows from (1) that N(n, m) = O(mn−2) and it is an easy consequence of (7) and theStirling formula that λ−1m = O(m(n+2q)/2). Since 2r > n + q = (n + 2q)/2 + (n −1)/2 + 1we get λ−1m m−2r(N(n, m)/ωn)1/2 = o(m−1−ǫ) for some ǫ > 0, and the series is convergent.We denote the sum of this series by L(q) and put K(q) = |λ0|−1ω−1/2n, so we get (9).4
We have proved that the series in (10) converges uniformly and defines a continuousfunction on Ωn. It follows from (5) and the fact that all functions Ymj are orthogonal that(H, Ymj) = (RΩn |⟨x, ξ⟩|qbH(ξ)dξ, Ymj(x)) for every m = 0, 1, 2, ... and j = 1, ..., N(n, m).Hence, the function bH satisfies (8).Let X be an n-dimensional Banach space, q > 0, q ̸= 2k, k ∈N.
Let c(q) = Γ((n +q)/2)/(2Γ((q + 1)/2)π(n−1)/2) be a constant such that 1 = c(q)RΩn |⟨x, ξ⟩|qdξ for everyx ∈Ωn. (The latter integral does not depend on the choice of x ∈Ωn; it means that thenorm of the space ln2 admits the Levy representation with the uniform measure on thesphere and the space ln2 is isometric to a subspace of Lq for every q)Denote by H(x), x ∈Ωn the restriction of the function ∥x∥q to the sphere Ωn.
Assumethat the function H belongs to the class C2r on Ωn where 2r > n + q, r ∈N. Let bH bethe function corresponding to H by Theorem 1.Lemma 2.
If the number K(q)∥H −1∥L2(Ωn) + L(q)∥∆rH∥L2(Ωn) is less than c(q) thenthe space X is isometric to a subspace of Lq.Proof: By (8) and definition of the number c(q),H(x) −1 =ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|q(bH(ξ) −c(q))dξfor every x ∈Ωn. By (9), |bH(x) −c(q)| < c(q) for every x ∈Ωn.
It means that thefunction bH is positive on the sphere. The equality (8) means that the space X admits theLevy representation with a non-negative measure and, by the reasoning at the beginningof Section 3, X is isometric to a subspace of Lq.Now we are able to prove the main result of this paper.
Let us only note that, forevery function f of the class C2 on the sphere Ωn and for a small enough number λ, thefunction N(x) = 1 + λf(x), x ∈Ωn is the restriction to the sphere of some norm in Rn.This is an easy consequence of the following one-dimensional fact: If a, b ∈R, g is a convexfunction on [a, b] with g′′ > δ > 0 on [a, b] for some δ and h ∈C2[a, b] then functions g+λhhave positive second derivatives on [a, b] for sufficiently small λ’s, and, hence, are convexon [a, b].Theorem 2. Let Q be a compact subset of (0, ∞) \ {2k, k ∈N}.
Then there exists aBanach space different from Hilbert spaces which is isometric to a subspace of Lq for everyq ∈Q.Proof: Let f be any infinitely differentiable function on Ωn and fix a number r ∈N sothat 2r > n+q for every q ∈Q. Choose a sufficiently small number λ such that the functionN(x) = 1 + λf(x), x ∈Ωn is the restriction to the sphere of some norm in Rn ( see the5
remark before Theorem 2) and such that, for every q ∈Q, the function H(x) = (N(x))qsatisfies the condition of Lemma 2. The possibility of such choice of λ follows from the factsthat K(q), L(q) and c(q) are continuous functions of q on the set Q and that ∥H −1∥L2(Ωn)and ∥∆2rH∥L2(Ωn) tend to zero uniformly with resrect to q ∈Q as λ tends to zero.
Nowwe can apply Lemma 2 to complete the proof.Finally, let us consider the case where q is an even integer. It is easy to see that, forany fixed number 2k, k ∈N, k > 1, we can make the space X constructed in Theorem2 isometric to a subspace of L2k.
In fact, let N(x) = (1 + λ(x2k1+ ... + x2kn ))1/4. Forsufficiently small numbers λ, N is the restriction to the sphere of some norm in Rn and thecorresponding space X is isometric to a subspace of Lq for every q ∈Q.
On the other hand,X is isometric to a subspace of L2k because the norm admits the Levy representation witha measure on the sphere:1 + λ(x2k1 + ... + x2kn ) =ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|2k(c(2k)dξ + λdδ1(ξ) + ... + λdδn(ξ))where δi is a unit mass at the point ξ ∈Rn with ξi = 1, ξj = 0, j ̸= i.Let us show that one can not make the space X isometric to subspaces of L2p andL2q if p, q ∈N and do not have common factors. In fact, if (X, ∥· ∥) is such a space then,for every x ∈Rn,∥x∥4pq = (ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|2pdµ(ξ))2q = (ZΩn|⟨x, ξ⟩|2qdν(ξ))2pfor some measures µ, ν on Ωn.
The functions in the latter equality are polynomials and,since the polynomial ring has the unique factorization property , we conclude that ∥x∥2 isa homogeneous polynomial of the second order and X is a Hilbert space.The situation is not clear if p and q have common factors. One can find some inter-esting results on Banach spaces with polynomial norms and on the structure of subspacesof L2k, k ∈N in the paper [7].Acknowledgements.
I wish to thank Prof. Nigel Kalton for valuable remarks and helpfuldiscussions during the work on this problem. I am grateful to Prof. Hermann Konig forbringing the paper [9] to my attention.6
References.1.Bretagnolle, J., Dacunha-Castelle, D. and Krivine, J.L. : Lois stables et espaces Lp,Ann.
Inst. H.Poincare, Ser.B 2(1966), 231-259.2.Dor, L.: Potentials and isometric embeddings in L1, Israel J.
Math. 24 (1976), 260-268.3.Grzaslewicz, R.: Plane sections of the unit ball of Lp, Acta Math.
Hung. 52(1988),219-225.4.Koldobsky, A.: Schoenberg’s problem on positive definite functions, Algebra and Anal-ysis 3 (1991), No.
3, 78-85 (Russian); English translation in St.Petersburg Math. J.3 (1992), 563-5705.Koldobsky, A.: Generalized Levy representation of norms and isometric embeddingsinto Lp-spaces, Ann.
Inst. H.Poincare (Prob.
and Stat.) 28 (1992), 335-3536.Muller, C.: Spherical Harmonics, Lect.
Notes in Math. 17 , Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1966.7.Reznick, B.: Banach spaces with polynomial norms, Pacific J.
Math. 82 (1979), 223-235.8.Schneider, R.: Zu einem problem von Shephard uber die projektionen konvexer korper,Math.
Zeitschrift 101 (1967), 71-82.9.Schneider, R.: Zonoids whose polars are zonoids, Proc. Amer.
Math. Soc.
50 (1975),365-368.10.Schoenberg, I.J. : Metric spaces and positive definite functions, Trans.
Amer. Math.Soc.
44 (1938), 522-536.7
출처: arXiv:9211.209 • 원문 보기