Physics / History and Philosophy of Physics

All posts under category "Physics / History and Philosophy of Physics"

3 posts total
Sorted by date
Putting Probabilities First  How Hilbert Space Generates and Constrains Them

Putting Probabilities First How Hilbert Space Generates and Constrains Them

We use Bub s (2016) correlation arrays and Pitowksy s (1989b) correlation polytopes to analyze an experimental setup due to Mermin (1981) for measurements on the singlet state of a pair of spin-$ frac12$ particles. The class of correlations allowed by quantum mechanics in this setup is represented by an elliptope inscribed in a non-signaling cube. The class of correlations allowed by local hidden-variable theories is represented by a tetrahedron inscribed in this elliptope. We extend this analysis to pairs of particles of arbitrary spin. The class of correlations allowed by quantum mechanics is still represented by the elliptope; the subclass of those allowed by local hidden-variable theories by polyhedra with increasing numbers of vertices and facets that get closer and closer to the elliptope. We use these results to advocate for an interpretation of quantum mechanics like Bub s. Probabilities and expectation values are primary in this interpretation. They are determined by inner products of vectors in Hilbert space. Such vectors do not themselves represent what is real in the quantum world. They encode families of probability distributions over values of different sets of observables. As in classical theory, these values ultimately represent what is real in the quantum world. Hilbert space puts constraints on possible combinations of such values, just as Minkowski space-time puts constraints on possible spatio-temporal constellations of events. Illustrating how generic such constraints are, the equation for the elliptope derived in this paper is a general constraint on correlation coefficients that can be found in older literature on statistics and probability theory. Yule (1896) already stated the constraint. De Finetti (1937) already gave it a geometrical interpretation.

paper research
No Image

Crowther s Quantum Interpretation Insights and Sharpening Points

We read Karen Crowther s emph{Another 100 Years of Quantum Interpretation?} with two practical goals. First, we spell out what she means by interpretation an attempt to provide understanding (not just predictions), which may be representationalist or non-representationalist, and which she contrasts with deeper emph{reductive} (inter-theoretic) explanation -- especially in the quantum-gravity setting. Second, we list twelve points where the paper s physics-facing wording could be sharpened. In our view, several claims are directionally well-motivated but stated more strongly than the underlying physics supports, or they run together distinct notions (e.g. degrees of freedom, singularity, and different senses of locality ) that need careful separation. We end by suggesting that the philosophical question is genuinely worthwhile, but the physics should be phrased more cautiously so that heuristic motivation is not mistaken for strict implication.

paper research
No Image

The Logical Structure of Physical Laws A Fixed Point Reconstruction

We formalise the self referential definition of physical laws using monotone operators on a lattice of theories, resolving the pathologies of naive set theoretic formulations. By invoking Tarski fixed point theorem, we identify physical theories as least fixed points of admissibility constraints derived from Galois connections. We demonstrate that QED and General Relativity can be represented in such a logical structure with respect to their symmetry and locality principles.

paper research

< Category Statistics (Total: 566) >

Quantum Physics
5

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut