Title: A Dataset and Benchmarks for Atrial Fibrillation Detection from Electrocardiograms of Intensive Care Unit Patients
ArXiv ID: 2512.18031
Date: 2025-12-19
Authors: Sarah Nassar, Nooshin Maghsoodi, Sophia Mannina, Shamel Addas, Stephanie Sibley, Gabor Fichtinger, David Pichora, David Maslove, Purang Abolmaesumi, Parvin Mousavi
📝 Abstract
Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia experienced by intensive care unit (ICU) patients and can cause adverse health effects. In this study, we publish a labelled ICU dataset and benchmarks for AF detection. Methods: We compared machine learning models across three data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) approaches: feature-based classifiers, deep learning (DL), and ECG foundation models (FMs). This comparison addresses a critical gap in the literature and aims to pinpoint which AI approach is best for accurate AF detection. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a Canadian ICU and the 2021 PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge were used to conduct the experiments. Multiple training configurations were tested, ranging from zero-shot inference to transfer learning. Results: On average and across both datasets, ECG FMs performed best, followed by DL, then feature-based classifiers. The model that achieved the top F1 score on our ICU test set was ECG-FM through a transfer learning strategy (F1=0.89). Conclusion: This study demonstrates promising potential for using AI to build an automatic patient monitoring system. Significance: By publishing our labelled ICU dataset (LinkToBeAdded) and performance benchmarks, this work enables the research community to continue advancing the state-of-the-art in AF detection in the ICU.
💡 Deep Analysis
📄 Full Content
1
A Dataset and Benchmarks for Atrial Fibrillation Detection from
Electrocardiograms of Intensive Care Unit Patients
Sarah Nassar, Nooshin Maghsoodi, Sophia Mannina, Shamel Addas, Stephanie Sibley, Gabor Fichtinger,
David Pichora, David Maslove, Purang Abolmaesumi, and Parvin Mousavi
Abstract— Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most
common cardiac arrhythmia experienced by intensive care
unit (ICU) patients and can cause adverse health effects.
In this study, we publish a labelled ICU dataset and
benchmarks for AF detection. Methods: We compared
machine learning models across three data-driven artificial
intelligence (AI) approaches: feature-based classifiers, deep
learning (DL), and ECG foundation models (FMs). This
comparison addresses a critical gap in the literature and
aims to pinpoint which AI approach is best for accurate
AF detection. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a Canadian
ICU and the 2021 PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology
Challenge were used to conduct the experiments. Multiple
training configurations were tested, ranging from zero-shot
inference to transfer learning. Results: On average and
across both datasets, ECG FMs performed best, followed by
DL, then feature-based classifiers. The model that achieved
the top F1 score on our ICU test set was ECG-FM through
a transfer learning strategy (F1=0.89). Conclusion: This
study demonstrates promising potential for using AI to
build an automatic patient monitoring system. Significance:
By publishing our labelled ICU dataset 1 and performance
benchmarks, this work enables the research community to
continue advancing the state-of-the-art in AF detection in
the ICU environment.
Index Terms— Atrial fibrillation, intensive care unit,
electrocardiography, machine learning, deep learning, foun-
dation models.
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Motivation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac
arrhythmia and can lead to negative health outcomes
such as heart failure and stroke [1]. The prevalence of
AF is higher in the intensive care unit (ICU) than in
S. Nassar is with the Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada (e-mail:
sarah.nassar@queensu.ca).
N. Maghsoodi and P. Mousavi are with the School of Computing at
Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
S. Mannina and S. Addas are with the Smith School of Business at
Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
S. Sibley is with the Departments of Emergency Medicine and
Critical Care Medicine at Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
G. Fichtinger is with the School of Computing and the Department of
Electrical and Computer Engineering at Queen’s University, Kingston,
ON, Canada.
D. Pichora is with the Department of Surgery at Queen’s University,
Kingston, ON, Canada.
D. Maslove is with the Departments of Medicine and Critical Care
Medicine at Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
P. Abolmaesumi is with the Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC,
Canada.
1LinkToBeAdded
the general population at up to 15-20% or more [2]–
[4]. AF is primarily diagnosed by visually inspecting the
electrocardiogram (ECG) reading of a patient and iden-
tifying morphological irregularities such as inconsistent
intervals between R peaks and missing P waves [5]. AF
management in ICU patients presents a unique challenge
as these patients are at higher risk of rapid health
deterioration. However, ICU patients are connected to
bedside monitors that continuously capture their ECG
readings, allowing for automatic monitoring of their
cardiac rhythm. Therefore, it is of utmost importance
to leverage this continuous telemetry data to allow for
timely initiation of treatment strategies.
Given the continuous nature of ECG data capture,
the amount of time, training, and experience needed to
interpret ECGs, and the urgency required to treat patients
with AF as soon as possible, artificial intelligence (AI)
can be used to develop an automatic detection algo-
rithm that can continuously process a patient’s ECG
and classify whether AF is occurring. To facilitate this
downstream application of real-time patient monitoring,
different AI technologies need to be compared to find the
best approach suitable for the ICU context.
B. Problem
The body of literature in AI-powered ECG-based ar-
rhythmia detection is rich, with many diverse approaches.
By exploring existing literature, it can be noted that
deep learning (DL) approaches are the most common [6].
Classical machine learning (ML) approaches, which re-
quire hand-crafted features to be extracted from ECGs,
are less common, even though the ECG signal modality
has distinguishable features that clinicians use to iden-
tify arrhythmia and that can be quantified. Additionally,
classical ML is typically less resource-intensive than
DL, which is an important consideration for real-time
deployment contexts. Further, ECG foundation models
(FMs) are an emerging trend [7], [8]. FMs are l