Bi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for Large-Scale Open Pit Mine Scheduling Problem under Uncertainty with Chance Constraints

Reading time: 2 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Bi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for Large-Scale Open Pit Mine Scheduling Problem under Uncertainty with Chance Constraints
  • ArXiv ID: 2511.08275
  • Date: 2025-11-11
  • Authors: 정보 없음 (논문에 명시된 저자 정보가 제공되지 않았습니다)

📝 Abstract

The open-pit mine scheduling problem (OPMSP) is a complex, computationally expensive process in long-term mine planning, constrained by operational and geological dependencies. Traditional deterministic approaches often ignore geological uncertainty, leading to suboptimal and potentially infeasible production schedules. Chance constraints allow modeling of stochastic components by ensuring probabilistic constraints are satisfied with high probability. This paper presents a bi-objective formulation of the OPMSP that simultaneously maximizes expected net present value and minimizes scheduling risk, independent of the confidence level required for the constraint. Solutions are represented using integer encoding, inherently satisfying reserve constraints. We introduce a domain-specific greedy randomized initialization and a precedence-aware period-swap mutation operator. We integrate these operators into three multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: the global simple evolutionary multi-objective optimizer (GSEMO), a mutation-only variant of multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D), and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). We compare our bi-objective formulation against the single-objective approach, which depends on a specific confidence level, by analyzing mine deposits consisting of up to 112 687 blocks. Results demonstrate that the proposed bi-objective formulation yields more robust and balanced trade-offs between economic value and risk compared to single-objective, confidence-dependent approach.

💡 Deep Analysis

Figure 1

📄 Full Content

📸 Image Gallery

Figure_1.png Figure_2a.png Figure_2b.png Figure_2c.png Figure_3a.png Figure_3b.png Figure_3c.png Figure_4a.png Figure_4b.png Figure_4c.png Figure_5a1.png Figure_5a2.png Figure_5b1.png Figure_5b2.png Figure_5c1.png Figure_5c2.png Figure_6a1.png Figure_6a2.png Figure_6a3.png Figure_6a4.png Figure_6b1.png Figure_6b2.png Figure_6b3.png Figure_6b4.png Figure_6c1.png Figure_6c2.png Figure_6c3.png Figure_6c4.png Figure_A1a1.png Figure_A1a2.png Figure_A1b1.png Figure_A1b2.png Figure_A1c1.png Figure_A1c2.png Figure_A2a1.png Figure_A2a2.png Figure_A2b1.png Figure_A2b2.png Figure_A2c1.png Figure_A2c2.png Figure_A3a1.png Figure_A3a2.png Figure_A3a3.png Figure_A3a4.png Figure_A3b1.png Figure_A3b2.png Figure_A3b3.png Figure_A3b4.png Figure_A3c1.png Figure_A3c2.png Figure_A3c3.png Figure_A3c4.png Figure_A4a1.png Figure_A4a2.png Figure_A4a3.png Figure_A4a4.png Figure_A4b1.png Figure_A4b2.png Figure_A4b3.png Figure_A4b4.png Figure_A4c1.png Figure_A4c2.png Figure_A4c3.png Figure_A4c4.png

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut