Who Gets Cited? Gender- and Majority-Bias in LLM-Driven Reference Selection

📝 Original Info

• Title: Who Gets Cited? Gender- and Majority-Bias in LLM-Driven Reference Selection
• ArXiv ID: 2508.02740
• Date: 2025-08-02
• Authors: ** 논문에 명시된 저자 정보가 제공되지 않았습니다. (If available, list names, affiliations, ORCID.) **

📝 Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted as research assistants, particularly for literature review and reference recommendation, yet little is known about whether they introduce demographic bias into citation workflows. This study systematically investigates gender bias in LLM-driven reference selection using controlled experiments with pseudonymous author names. We evaluate several LLMs (GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Claude Sonnet, and Claude Haiku) by varying gender composition within candidate reference pools and analyzing selection patterns across fields. Our results reveal two forms of bias: a persistent preference for male-authored references and a majority-group bias that favors whichever gender is more prevalent in the candidate pool. These biases are amplified in larger candidate pools and only modestly attenuated by prompt-based mitigation strategies. Field-level analysis indicates that bias magnitude varies across scientific domains, with social sciences showing the least bias. Our findings indicate that LLMs can reinforce or exacerbate existing gender imbalances in scholarly recognition. Effective mitigation strategies are needed to avoid perpetuating existing gender disparities in scientific citation practices before integrating LLMs into high-stakes academic workflows.

💡 Deep Analysis

📄 Full Content

Reference