A Semi-analytic but Biased Uncertainty Assessment Method using Sample Extensions, Analysed for Nonlinear Travel Time Tomography

Reading time: 2 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: A Semi-analytic but Biased Uncertainty Assessment Method using Sample Extensions, Analysed for Nonlinear Travel Time Tomography
  • ArXiv ID: 2507.16353
  • Date: 2025-07-22
  • Authors: ** 논문에 명시된 저자 정보가 제공되지 않았습니다. **

📝 Abstract

Many geophysical problems can be cast as inverse problems that estimate a set of parameter values from observed data. Within a Bayesian framework, solutions to such problems are described probabilistically by the so-called posterior probability distribution functions (pdf's). To obtain robust inference results often requires millions of model parameter value samples to be drawn, and their simulation to be performed; this is a computationally expensive procedure. We investigate the concept of sample extensions as a means to improve efficiency when solving fully nonlinear inverse problems. A sample's extension is defined as the set of models or parameter values whose forward function values are directly accessible from a sample for which the forward function has already been evaluated, obviating the need for additional forward function evaluations. In a specific case of first-arrival travel time calculations used in seismic travel time tomography, we apply sample extensions to obtain a continuous region with non-zero hypervolume within parameter space, across all of which the forward function values are known given only a single forward simulation. We devise a deterministic sampling technique that identifies the most informative extensions by solving an optimisation problem. In an illustrative tomographic example that involves a single travel time datum, we find 51 optimal samples, and use them to construct an analytic approximation to the Bayesian posterior pdf. Additionally, we propose an extensions-based algorithm for real-world tomography scenarios and apply it to a synthetic 2D example. This study highlights two fundamental problems that make the method inefficient: (1) limited hypervolumes of extensions and (2) neglecting parameter correlations to simplify analytic calculations. Finding solutions to these problems defines possible directions for future research.

💡 Deep Analysis

📄 Full Content

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut