📝 Original Info
- Title: Comment on ‘A note on generalized radial mesh generation for plasma electronic structure’
- ArXiv ID: 1105.2970
- Date: 2015-05-28
- Authors: ** - Jean‑Christophe Pain (CEA, DAM, DIF, F‑91297 Arpajon, France) - (논문에 직접 언급된 원 논문의 저자) B. G. Wilson, V. Sonnad — **
📝 Abstract
In a recent note [High Energy Density Phys. 7, 161 (2011)], B.G. Wilson and V. Sonnad proposed a very useful closed form expression for the efficient generation of analytic log-linear radial meshes. The central point of the note is an implicit equation for the parameter h, involving Lambert's function W[x]. The authors mention that they are unaware of any direct proof of this equation (they obtained it by re-summing the Taylor expansion of h using high-order coefficients obtained by analytic differentiation of the implicit definition using symbolic manipulation). In the present comment, we present a direct proof of that equation.
💡 Deep Analysis
📄 Full Content
arXiv:1105.2970v1 [physics.comp-ph] 15 May 2011
Comment on “A note on generalized radial
mesh generation for plasma electronic
structure”
Jean-Christophe Pain1
CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France
Abstract
In a recent note [High Energy Density Phys. 7, 161 (2011)], B.G.
Wilson and V. Sonnad proposed a very useful closed form expression
for the efficient generation of analytic log-linear radial meshes. The
central point of the note is an implicit equation for the parameter h,
involving Lambert’s function W[x]. The authors mention that they
are unaware of any direct proof of this equation (they obtained it by
re-summing the Taylor expansion of h[α] using high-order coefficients
obtained by analytic differentiation of the implicit definition using sym-
bolic manipulation). In the present comment, we present a direct proof
of that equation.
The log-linear radial mesh is defined by the implicit equation [1]:
kh = αrk
rc
+ ln
rk
rc
.
(1)
Substracting Eq. (1) for k=1 from Eq. (1) for k=n gives
(n −1)h = αrn −r1
rc
+ ln
rn
r1
.
(2)
Since one has
h0 ≜
1
n −1 ln
rn
r1
(3)
and
rc ≜
αr1
W[αeh],
(4)
1jean-christophe.pain@cea.fr
1
Eq. (2) becomes
(n −1)(h −h0) r1
rn −r1
= W[αeh].
(5)
Equation (3) can be re-written as
rn = r1 e(n−1)h0,
(6)
which enables one to write Eq. (5) as
(h −h0)
d
eh0 = W[αeh],
(7)
where W represents Lambert’s function and
d ≜enh0 −eh0
n −1
.
(8)
Equation (7) is equivalent to
(h −h0)
d
eh0 e
(h−h0)
d
eh0 = αeh,
(9)
i.e.
(h0 −h)
d
e(h0−h)( d−eh0
d
) = −α,
(10)
which leads, by multiplying both sides by s ≜d −eh0 = enh0−neh0
n−1
, to:
(h0 −h)s
d e(h0−h) s
d = −αs,
(11)
which is equivalent to
h = h0 −d
s W[−αs],
(12)
which is the result of Ref. [1].
References
[1] B.G. Wilson and V. Sonnad, High Energy Density Phys. 7, 161 (2011).
2
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.