We explore the connection between a stochastic simulation model and an ordinary differential equations (ODEs) model of the dynamics of an excitable gene circuit that exhibits noise-induced oscillations. Near a bifurcation point in the ODE model, the stochastic simulation model yields behavior dramatically different from that predicted by the ODE model. We analyze how that behavior depends on the gene copy number and find very slow convergence to the large number limit near the bifurcation point. The implications for understanding the dynamics of gene circuits and other birth-death dynamical systems with small numbers of constituents are discussed.
February 24, 2012
1
The Transition between Stochastic and Deterministic Behavior
in an Excitable Gene Circuit
Robert C. Hilborn*, Benjamin Brookshire, Jenna Mattingly, Anusha
Purushotham, and Anuraag Sharma
The University of Texas at Dallas
Richardson, TX 75080, USA
Abstract
We explore the connection between a stochastic simulation model and an ordinary differential
equations (ODEs) model of the dynamics of an excitable gene circuit that exhibits noise-induced
oscillations. Near a bifurcation point in the ODE model, the stochastic simulation model yields
behavior dramatically different from that predicted by the ODE model. We analyze how that
behavior depends on the gene copy number and find very slow convergence to the large number
limit near the bifurcation point. The implications for understanding the dynamics of gene
circuits and other birth-death dynamical systems with small numbers of constituents are
discussed.
Introduction
Gene circuits are sets of interacting genes and proteins (and perhaps other biological
molecules). It is now widely recognized that stochastic fluctuations play an important role in the
dynamics of gene circuits [1]. The effects of these fluctuations on gene expression have been
studied in a variety of papers [2-7]. In fact, these stochastic fluctuations may explain some
aspects of phenotype behavior: how differentiated cells emerge from cells with identical genetic
makeup and identical environments, although many other so-called epigenetic effects such as
DNA methylation, histone modification, and small interfering RNAs also play a role in
differentiation and inheritance of differentiated characteristics [8,8,9].
February 24, 2012
2
These fluctuations, always present when gene copy numbers and the number of resulting
messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and proteins are small, must be taken into account to understand the
dynamics of genetic oscillators such as circadian clock networks. Similar issues arise in the
modeling of chemical reaction networks [10] and ecological populations [11] when the number
of constituents is small. In this paper, however, we focus on the dynamics of gene circuits.
Many studies of gene regulatory circuits have focused only on steady-state behavior. For
many gene circuits, however, temporal behavior yields important information that is not
accessible from just steady-state conditions. Furthermore, in many situations, protein production
occurs in bursts and sometimes gene regulation varies in time due to environmental changes, cell
differentiation and disease. Measuring and understanding the temporal dynamics of gene circuits
also helps to identify causal relations and feedback loops, the details of which are hidden under
steady-state conditions. The importance of temporal behavior in understanding gene circuits was
emphasized in a recent review [12].
Many important cellular and organismal periodic processes are controlled by genetic
networks with more or less periodic oscillations. From the dynamics point of view, these
periodic oscillations are surprising because most genes are present with only small copy
numbers—typically one or two copies per cell. Naively, one might expect that the large relative
fluctuations normally associated with small molecular numbers would lead to irregular
oscillations. In reality, many of these genetic circuits exhibit quite regular periodicity even when
the copy numbers are small. The long-term goal of our study is to understand how genetic
circuits are able to maintain regular oscillations in spite of the molecular fluctuations associated
with small numbers. In this paper, we focus on the connections between two classes of models
February 24, 2012
3
of gene circuit dynamics: deterministic (ordinary differential equation) models and stochastic
models.
Once the key elements of a genetic circuit are identified, the dynamics of the circuit can
be specified either by a set of deterministic ordinary differential equations (ODEs) (often called
rate equations) or by a stochastic formulation, usually implemented as a Monte Carlo simulation
of the dynamics. The stochastic formulation, by design, includes fluctuations due to small
molecular numbers. Such fluctuations are of course absent from the ODE models. The goal of
this paper is to see how the behavior of stochastic models is related to the deterministic behavior
of the commonly used ODE models.
An equivalent stochastic formulation using the so-called master equation [13] for the
dynamics of the probability distribution for the number of molecules of the relevant species is, in
most cases, intractable for anything but the simplest networks. There are also intermediate
methods that add stochastic terms to the deterministic differential equation models. These
intermediate methods are often described by chemical Langevin equations [14], which can be
derived from the master equ
This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.