In this paper, we prove that the Banach contraction principle proved by S. G. Matthews in 1994 on 0--complete partial metric spaces can be extended to cyclical mappings. However, the generalized contraction principle proved by D. Ili\'{c}, V. Pavlovi\'{c} and V. Rako\u{c}evi\'{c} in "Some new extensions of Banach's contraction principle to partial metric spaces, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011), 1326--1330" on complete partial metric spaces can not be extended to cyclical mappings. Some examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of our results. Moreover, we generalize some of the results obtained by W. A. Kirk, P. S. Srinivasan and P. Veeramani in "Fixed points for mappings satisfying cyclical contractive conditions, Fixed Point Theory 4 (1) (2003),79--89". Finally, an Edelstein's type theorem is also extended in case one of the sets in the cyclic decomposition is 0-compact.
The partial metric spaces were first introduced in [1] as a part of the study of nonsymmetric topology, domain theory and denotational semantics of dataflow networks. In particular, the author established the precise relationship between partial metric spaces and the so-called weightable quasimetric spaces and proved a partial metric generalization of Banach contraction mapping theorem which is considered to be the core of many extended fixed point theorems; we refer the reader to the papers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
The widespread applications of the notion of partial metric spaces in programming theory have attracted the attention of many authors who recently published important results in the direction of generalizing this principle; see for instance [11,12,13,14]. The contraction type conditions used in these generalizations, however, do not apparently reflect the structure of partial metric spaces. In the remarkable paper [15], the authors proved more appropriate contraction principle in partial metric spaces. Indeed, it is more convenient to call the contraction type condition used in this paper by partial contractive condition.
In this paper, we prove that the Banach contraction principle obtained in [1] on 0-complete partial metric spaces can be extended to cyclical mappings. However, the generalized contraction principle proved in [15] on complete partial metric spaces can not be extended to cyclical mappings. Some examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of our results. In addition to this, we generalize some of the results obtained in [16]. Finally, an Edelstein’s type theorem is also extended in case one of the sets in the cyclic decomposition is 0-compact.
We recall some definitions of partial metric spaces and state some of their properties. A partial metric space (PMS) is a pair (X, p : X × X → R + ) (where R + denotes the set of all non negative real numbers) such that (P1) p(x, y) = p(y, x) (symmetry);
(P2) If 0 ≤ p(x, x) = p(x, y) = p(y, y) then x = y (equality); (P3) p(x, x) ≤ p(x, y) (small self-distances);
(P4) p(x, z) + p(y, y) ≤ p(x, y) + p(y, z) (triangularity); for all x, y, z ∈ X.
For a partial metric p on X, the function p s : X × X → R + given by
is a (usual) metric on X. Each partial metric p on X generates a T 0 topology τ p on X with a base of the family of open p-balls {B p (x, ε) : x ∈ X, ε > 0}, where B p (x, ε) = {y ∈ X : p(x, y) < p(x, x) + ε} for all x ∈ X and ε > 0.
(i) A sequence {x n } in a PMS (X, p) converges to x ∈ X if and only if p(x, x) = lim n→∞ p(x, x n ).
(ii) A sequence {x n } in a PMS (X, p) is called a Cauchy if and only if lim n,m→∞ p(x n , x m ) exists (and finite).
(iii) A PMS (X, p) is said to be complete if every Cauchy sequence {x n } in X converges, with respect to τ p , to a point x ∈ X such that p(x, x) = lim n,m→∞ p(x n , x m ).
(iv) A mapping f : X → X is said to be continuous at
(a2) A PMS (X, p) is complete if and only if the metric space (X, p s ) is complete. Moreover,
Lemma 2. Let (X, p) be a partial metric space and let T : X → X be a continuous self-mapping. Assume {x n } ∈ X such that x n → z as n → ∞. Then
Proof. Let ǫ > 0 be given. Since T is continuous at z find δ > 0 such that T (B p (z, δ)) ⊆ B p (T z, ǫ). Since x n → z then lim n→∞ p(x n , z) = p(z, z) and hence find
This shows our claim.
A sequence {x n } is called 0-Cauchy if lim m,n→∞ p(x n , x m ) = 0. The partial metric space (X, p) is called 0-complete if every 0-Cauchy sequence in x converges to a point x ∈ X with respect to p and p(x, x) = 0. Clearly, every complete partial metric space is complete. The converse need not be true; see [17] for more details.
with the partial metric p(x, y) = max{x, y} where Q is the set of rationals. Then (X, p) is a 0-complete partial metric space which is not complete.
Theorem 1. [1,17] Let(X, p) be a 0-complete partial metric space and f : X → X be such that p(f (x), f (y)) ≤ αp(x, y)∀x, y ∈ Xand α ∈ [0, 1)
there exists a unique u ∈ X such that u = f (u) and p(u, u) = 0.
Let ρ p = inf{p(x, y) : x, y ∈ X} and define X p = {x ∈ X : p(x, x) = ρ p }.
Theorem 2. [15] Let (X, p) be a complete metric space, α ∈ [0, 1) and T : X → X a given mapping. Suppose that for each x, y ∈ X the following condition holds p(x, y) ≤ max{αp(x, y), p(x, x), p(y, y)}.
(1) the set X p is nonempty;
(2) there is a unique u ∈ X p such that T u = u;
(3) for each x ∈ X p the sequence {T n x} n≥1 converges with respect to the metric p s to u.
Definition 2. Let A and B be two nonempty closed subsets of a complete partial metric space (X, p) such that
If (C2) in Definition 2 is replaced by the condition
Then T is called a partial cyclical contraction.
Remark 1. The partial cyclical contractions reflects the real structure of partial metric space.
The proof of the following lemma can be easily achieved by using the partial metric topology. Lemma 3. A subset A of a partial metric space is closed if and only if x ∈ A whenever x n ∈ A satis
This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.