Integrability of Newton ovals, computation of air damper inlets
📝 Original Info
- Title: Integrability of Newton ovals, computation of air damper inlets
- ArXiv ID: 1110.6107
- Date: 2011-10-28
- Authors: V. I. Arnold, P. F.
📝 Abstract
About global and local algebraic integrability of ovals. A contribution to clarify Newton results and relative comments on his work done by Arnol'd and Pourciau. A possibile application to air damper sections computation is offered, as example of unexpected link between pure mathematics and industrial technology.💡 Deep Analysis

📄 Full Content
If an oval is smooth, it is not algebraically squarable.
For example, Kepler elliptical ovals are not algebraically squarable, and so the convex Newton apple (Fig. 2; see forward for its equation). The unit square of equation x 2 y 2 -x 2 y -xy 2 + xy = 0 is algebraically squarable and a polynomial satisfying the definition is In their works, Arnol’d and Pourciau describe how the Newton result about ovals integrability can be interpreted in a weaker sense too, using the same logical argumentation used by Newton in his proof. They introduce the concept of locally algebraically integrability, without giving a clear formal definition. But from the examples and from the proofs which they offer, one can deduce the following definition:
An oval is said to be locally algebraically squarable if for each point P 0 exist a line L 0 of equation a 0 x + b 0 y + c 0 = 0 and a polynomial Q 0 (p, q, r, s) such that the areas S of the segments formed by all the lines ax + by + c = 0, in a suitable geometrical neighbourhood of the line L 0 , satisfy the equation
In practice, in (global) algebraic integrability for the whole oval there is a polynomial Q such that Q(S, a, b, c) = 0, while in local algebraic integrability for each point P 0 of the oval there is a polynomial
As Newton understood (see [1]), global and local algebraic integrability seem to depend on the degree of smoothness of the curve. A curve F (x, y) is said to be of class C m at its point P 0 = (x 0 , y 0 ) if its partial derivatives until the m-th order exist at P 0 , they are continuous, and the gradient (∂ x F (x 0 , y 0 ), ∂ y F (x 0 , y 0 )) is not the null vector (that is P 0 is regular). A curve is said to be of class C m if all its points are regular and its partial derivatives until the m-th order exist and are continuous. If also the curve is infinitely derivable with continuity, it is of class C ∞ . The curve is said to be analytic at P 0 if it is expandible in a convergent power series of integer exponents in a neighbourhood of P 0 .
Theorem An algebraic curve of class C 1 at its point P 0 , is analytic at P 0 .
Proof. Suppose ∂ y F (x 0 , y 0 ) = 0. From the theorem of implicit function, there is a function y = φ(x) such that F (x, φ(x)) = 0 for all the x in a neighbourhood of P 0 . Also, φ is derivable and its first derivative is
Note that, using permanence of sign, the neighbourhood of P 0 can be chosen so that ∂ y F (x, φ(x)) > 0 on it. Therefore, being F (x, y) partially derivable indefinitely, from (1) the successive derivatives φ ′′ , φ ′′′ , … have only integer powers of ∂ y F (x, φ(x)) at denominator, and we deduce that φ is indefinitely derivable. So locally the curve F (x, y) is the graph of an infinitely differentiable function y = φ(x). From a theorem of Newton ( [1]), it follows that F is analytic at P 0 .
A curve is analytic if it is analytic at every point. Newton has proven ( [1]) that a C ∞ oval is analytic and it is not algebraically squarable, even locally. From previous theorem it can be deduced that A C 1 oval is not algebraically squarable, even locally.
Hence, if you want an oval locally algebraically squarable, you must search among ovals with at least a singular point, that is a point P 0 = (x 0 , y 0 ) such that ∂ x F (x 0 , y 0 ) = ∂ y F (x 0 , y 0 ) = 0. Note that an oval can be smooth in the sense of Newton, that is to have continuous tangent line at every point, but it could not be of class C 1 (in the paper of Pourciau, smooth is equivalent to C 1 , but this seems not to agree with Newton assumptions). Arnol’d ( [1]) offers the example of the parametric curve x = (t 2 -1) 2 , y = t 3 -t for -1 ≤ t ≤ 1, which have continuous and never null tangent vector (4t(t 2 -1), 3t 2 -1), that is the curve is smooth. But if we consider its algebraic equation, that is y 4 -2xy 2 -x 3 + x 2 = 0, we can see that the origin (0, 0) is the unique singular point, that is the curve is not of class C 1 . Therefore, from Newton this oval is not algebraic squarable. It is locally algebraic squarable (see ( [1]), b
📸 Image Gallery
