The Igusa-Todorov function for comodules
📝 Original Info
- Title: The Igusa-Todorov function for comodules
- ArXiv ID: 1106.4285
- Date: 2011-09-07
- Authors: Haim Mariana, Lanzilotta Marcelo and Mata Gustavo
📝 Abstract
We define the Igusa-Todorov function in the context of finite dimensional comodules and prove that a coalgebra is left qcF if and only if it is left semiperfect and its Igusa-Todorov function on each right finite dimensional comodule is zero.💡 Deep Analysis
📄 Full Content
In Section 4 we use some computations with the IT-function, to deduce some well known facts about qcF coalgebras.
- The Igusa-Todorov function 2.1. Some notations. In this work, C will be a coalgebra over a field k and we will denote by M C and C M the categories of right and left comodules over C respectively and by M C f and C M f the respective complete subcategories of finite dimensional comodules. Since M C and C M are Grothendieck categories, every object in them has an injective envelope (see for example [3]).
2.2. The Igusa-Todorov function on comodules. Let C be a coalgebra and K(C) be the free abelian group generated by all symbols
is the free abelian group generated by all isomorphism classes of indecomposable non injective objects in M C . As the syzygy Ω -1 respects direct sums and sends injective comodules to 0, it gives rise to a group morphism (that we also call Ω -1 ) Ω -1 : K(C) → K(C).
f , let M denote the subgroup of K(C) generated by all the symbols [N ], where N is an indecomposable non injective direct summand of M . Since the rank of Ω -1 ( M ) is less or equal to the rank of M , which is finite, it exists a non-negative integer n such that the rank of Ω
The main properties of ϕ are summarised in the following lemma, whose version for Artin algebras has been proved, almost all in [1] and the last in [6] and can be easily adapted to obtain the version for coalgebras.
Lemma 2.1. ( [1], [6]) Let C be a coalgebra and
In a similar way it is possible to define ϕ on the category C M f . We will use the same notation for both functions, when no confusion arises. Remark 2.2. Note that ϕ(M ) = 0 mains that rkΩ -n ( M ) remains constant for all n ∈ N.
The following example shows that dim ϕ ( C M f ) and dim ϕ (M C f ) can be different. Example 2.4. Consider the quiver
• and let C be the coalgebra whose elements are all paths in kQ of length less or equal to one. Each comodule M in C M f can be seen as a kQ-representation (M i , T i ) i∈N where T i : M i+1 → M i is such that T i .T i+1 = 0, for all i ∈ N. It is easy to check that every such representation can be decomposed into a sum of indecomposable representations of the form (see [9]):
Note that representations of the first type are injective, while representations of the second type are simple. As ϕ(M ⊕ I) = ϕ(M ), whenever I is injective, in order to prove that ϕ(M ) = 0, for every comodule M in C M f , it is enough to show it for cosemisimple comodules. If we consider:
after applying Ω -1 to M we obtain the representation
Hence the ranks of Ω -1 (M ) and M are equal, and then, by induction (because Ω -1 (M ) is cosemisimple), the ranks of Ω -n (M ) and M are equal. Then ϕ(M ) = 0 for every cosemisimple object in C M f , so dim ϕ ( C M f ) = 0.
On the other hand, right C-comodules can be seen as Q ′ -representations (M i , T i ) i∈N where T i : M i → M i+1 is such that T i .T i+1 = 0, for all i ∈ N and
Now, the right C-comodule:
(where the non zero vector space k is p