Primary Initiation of Submarine Canyons

Reading time: 4 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Primary Initiation of Submarine Canyons
  • ArXiv ID: 1102.0495
  • Date: 2011-02-03
  • Authors: J. Marvin Herndon

📝 Abstract

The discovery of close-to-star gas-giant exo-planets lends support to the idea of Earth's origin as a Jupiter-like gas-giant and to the consequences of its compression, including whole-Earth decompression dynamics that gives rise, without requiring mantle convection, to the myriad measurements and observations whose descriptions are attributed to plate tectonics. I propose here another, unanticipated consequence of whole-Earth decompression dynamics: namely, a specific, dominant, non-erosion, underlying initiation-mechanism precursor for submarine canyons that follows as a direct consequence of Earth's early origin as a Jupiter-like gas-giant.

💡 Deep Analysis

Figure 1

📄 Full Content

1

Primary Initiation of Submarine Canyons

J. Marvin Herndon Transdyne Corporation San Diego, CA 92131 USA

mherndon@san.rr.com

Key Words: submarine canyon, whole-Earth decompression dynamics, coastal canyons, erosion processes

Abstract: The discovery of close-to-star gas-giant exo-planets lends support to the idea of Earth’s origin as a Jupiter-like gas-giant and to the consequences of its compression, including whole-Earth decompression dynamics that gives rise, without requiring mantle convection, to the myriad measurements and observations whose descriptions are attributed to plate tectonics. I propose here another, unanticipated consequence of whole-Earth decompression dynamics: namely, a specific, dominant, non-erosion, underlying initiation-mechanism precursor for submarine canyons that follows as a direct consequence of Earth’s early origin as a Jupiter-like gas-giant.

The origin of submarine canyons, ubiquitous, prominent features of continental margins that sometimes in scale rival the Grand Canyon, has been the subject of much debate. Virtually all submarine canyons are subject to erosion, so the origin-debate generally focuses on the nature and circumstances of their formation by erosion-processes [1-3]. While there may be more than one submarine-canyon initiation-process, the commonality of their occurrence in diverse environments suggests the potential dominance of one underlying mechanism. The purpose of this brief communication is to propose that specific, dominant, underlying initiation-mechanism: an unanticipated, non-erosion precursor that follows as a direct consequence of Earth’s early origin as a Jupiter-like gas-giant. The presently popular idea of Solar System formation began with publication in 1963 of an assumption-based model by Cameron [4]. The idea, later called the “standard model of solar system formation”, was that dust would condense from a diffuse, hot gas of solar composition at 2

a pressure of about 10-5 bar. The dust would then collect into balls, then into rocks, then into boulder-size accumulations, and finally into planetesimals; these would eventually gather to form a planet like Earth. Subsequently, I showed from thermodynamic considerations why the model was wrong: Essentially all of the condensable elements of a gas of solar composition at such a low pressure would condense as oxides leaving no iron metal for a massive-core planet like Earth [5]. In 1944, Eucken [6] described from thermodynamic considerations Earth’s formation by condensation at high pressures, ≥ 100 bar, in the interior of a hot gaseous protoplanet of solar composition. In such an environment, molten iron (and the elements dissolved therein), being the most refractory condensate, rain-out to form Earth’s core before condensation forms the mantle. I have verified Eucken’s calculations and extended his concept to include complete condensation of volatile elements [5, 7, 8]. Fully condensed with about 300 Earth-masses of hydrogen, helium, and other volatiles, Earth’s gas-giant, pre-Hadean mass was virtually identical to that of Jupiter [5]. My idea of Earth having an early origin as a Jupiter-like gas giant is not at all strange as close-to-star gas-giant exo-planets are observed in other planetary systems [9]. The dynamics of planet Earth, a direct consequence its early gas-giant origin, is described by my new geodynamic theory, called whole-Earth decompression dynamics [10-12], which gives rise to the myriad measurements and observations whose descriptions are attributed to plate tectonics, but without requiring mantle convection. It provides a basis for Earth’s previously having had reduced radius and a mechanism and powerful energy source for its decompression. Whole-Earth decompression dynamics obviates the primary pitfall of plate tectonics theory, the necessity of mantle convection, and overcomes the problems of endemic to Earth expansion theory, the absence of basis, energy source, and appropriate mechanism. Envision pre-Hadean Earth, compressed to about 64% of present radius by about 300 Earth-masses of primordial gases and ices. At some point, after being stripped of its massive volatile envelope, presumably by the Sun’s super-intense T-Tauri solar winds, internal pressures would build, eventually cracking the rigid crust. Powered by the stored energy of protoplanetary compression, Earth’s progressive decompression is manifest at the surface by the formation of cracks: primary decompression cracks with underlying heat sources capable of extruding basalt, and secondary decompression cracks without heat sources that serve as ultimate repositories for basalt extruded from primary decompression cracks. Mid-ocean ridges and submarine trenches, respectively, are examples of these. Secondary decompression cracks serve to increase surface area in response to decompression-driven volume expansion. Basalt extruded at mid-o

📸 Image Gallery

cover.png

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on open access ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut