Graph neural network for colliding particles with an application to sea ice floe modeling

Reading time: 6 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Graph neural network for colliding particles with an application to sea ice floe modeling
  • ArXiv ID: 2602.16213
  • Date: 2026-02-18
  • Authors: Ruibiao Zhu

📝 Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to sea ice modeling using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), utilizing the natural graph structure of sea ice, where nodes represent individual ice pieces, and edges model the physical interactions, including collisions. This concept is developed within a one-dimensional framework as a foundational step. Traditional numerical methods, while effective, are computationally intensive and less scalable. By utilizing GNNs, the proposed model, termed the Collision-captured Network (CN), integrates data assimilation (DA) techniques to effectively learn and predict sea ice dynamics under various conditions. The approach was validated using synthetic data, both with and without observed data points, and it was found that the model accelerates the simulation of trajectories without compromising accuracy. This advancement offers a more efficient tool for forecasting in marginal ice zones (MIZ) and highlights the potential of combining machine learning with data assimilation for more effective and efficient modeling.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Graph neural network for colliding particles with an application to sea ice floe modeling.

This paper introduces a novel approach to sea ice modeling using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), utilizing the natural graph structure of sea ice, where nodes represent individual ice pieces, and edges model the physical interactions, including collisions. This concept is developed within a one-dimensional framework as a foundational step. Traditional numerical methods, while effective, are computationally intensive and less scalable. By utilizing GNNs, the proposed model, termed the Collision-captured Network (CN), integrates data assimilation (DA) techniques to effectively learn and predict sea ice dynamics under various conditions. The approach was validated using synthetic data, both with and without observed data points, and it was found that the model accelerates the simulation of trajectories without compromising accuracy. This advancement offers a more efficient tool for forecasting in marginal ice zones (MIZ) and highlights the potential of combining machine learning with data a

📄 Full Content

This paper explores the integration of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for modeling discrete sea ice floes in the Marginal Ice Zone (MIZ). Sea ice acts as a critical regulator of the Earth's energy balance. Sea ice's high reflectivity (albedo) plays a crucial role in moderating the global climate by reflecting solar radiation back into space [1][2][3]. However, the diminishing extent of sea ice due to warming leads to a decrease in albedo and a corresponding increase in solar energy absorption by the Earth's surface, accelerating global warming Accepted in Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering: 16 Feb 2026 [4]. Thus, the simulation of sea ice floes is a crucial component in climate modeling and prediction, playing a vital role in enhancing understanding of the Earth's climate system, especially in MIZ [5].

The importance of sea floe simulation in understanding and addressing the challenges posed by a changing climate cannot be overstated [6][7][8][9]. Accurately predicted results from sea floe simulation would benefit the economy [10][11][12], ecosystems [13,14], astronomy [15], and human safety [16]. The Discrete Element Method (DEM) is particularly adept at exploring the complex behavioral dynamics and spatial-temporal variations of sea ice, especially on smaller scales such as those found in the MIZ. DEM’s detailed parameterizations allow for the simulation of mechanical interactions and responses to external forces like ocean drag and atmosphere drag, providing deep insights into the stress responses and movement dynamics of sea ice under various environmental conditions. Overall, DEM enhances our understanding and ability to predict sea ice behavior in these critical zones [17][18][19][20][21]. One significant limitation of the DEM is its high computational demand [22], which is especially evident in the context of sea ice modeling, where simulations must cover extensive geographic areas and long-duration phenomena. Historically, constraints on high-performance computing (HPC) resources have favored continuum models, with DEM being too costly to execute [5]. This computational load primarily stems from the necessity to detect contact between neighboring elements, a process that becomes particularly costly when employing polygonal elements due to the complex algorithms required to calculate contact points [23]. Consequently, this restricts the model’s application over larger spatial and temporal scales.

In general, solving forward problems typically involves fewer computational resources than solving inverse problems [24,25]. The GNNs provide a powerful tool for efficiently solving inverse problems by learning direct mappings from data to parameters, and GNNs have proven to be highly effective for analyzing graph-structured data, which underpins their growing application in various domains, including social networks, drug discovery, and more [26][27][28]. This effectiveness arises from GNNs’ ability to model relationships and interactions directly within the graph data, capturing complex connectivity patterns that are otherwise difficult with traditional neural network approaches [29,30].

GNNs operate on graphs by utilizing nodes and edges where the nodes represent entities and edges denote the interactions between these entities. Through techniques like message passing, nodes update their states based on the information from their neighbors, allowing GNNs to learn and generalize from the graph structure efficiently [29,30]. This process is particularly advantageous for tasks that involve rich relational data. The motivation for applying GNNs to sea ice modeling is supported by other proven successes in similarly complex systems in other scientific domains [26][27][28]. Given these capabilities, the application of GNNs to sea ice modeling presents a promising new avenue. GNNs could capture more insights by conceptualizing sea ice dynamics into graphs, where nodes represent sea ice features, including position and velocity, and edges capture interactions such as collisions.

Previous efforts to simulate sea ice dynamics within the MIZ have predominantly employed Discrete Element Methods (DEM), focusing on the physical interactions of individual ice floes. These methods, while detailed, are computationally intensive and often struggle to scale up due to their high computational demands [5,22]. Surprisingly, despite the rapid advancement in machine learning technologies [31][32][33][34], there has been a noticeable absence of research exploring the use of neural networks for sea ice simulation in the MIZ. This study contributes to this area by introducing a GNN-based sea ice simulation model: proposed Collision-captured Network (CN) as Figure 1 coupled with data assimilation (DA) techniques, inspired by the Interaction Network [35]. By leveraging the inherent graph structure of sea ice interactions in the MIZ, the proposed model offers an innovative solution that reduces computational overhead while

…(Full text truncated)…

📸 Image Gallery

14620.png 14630.png 14640.png 14650.png 14660.png 14670.png 14680.png 14690.png 14700.png 14710.png 14720.png 14730.png 14740.png 14750.png 14760.png 14770.png 14780.png 14790.png 14800.png 14810.png 14820.png 14830.png 14840.png 17600.png 17610.png 17620.png 17630.png 17640.png 17650.png 17660.png 17670.png 17680.png 17690.png 17700.png 17710.png 17720.png 17730.png 17740.png 17750.png 17760.png 17770.png 17780.png 17790.png 17800.png 17810.png 17820.png 17830.png 17840.png 17850.png 17860.png 17870.png 17880.png 5210.png 5220.png 5230.png 5240.png 5250.png 5260.png 5270.png 5280.png 5290.png 5300.png 5310.png 5320.png 5330.png 5340.png 5350.png 5360.png 5370.png 5380.png 5390.png 5400.png 5410.png 5420.png 5430.png 5440.png 5450.png 550.png 560.png 570.png 580.png 590.png 600.png 610.png 620.png 630.png 640.png 650.png 660.png 670.png 680.png 690.png 700.png 710.png 720.png 730.png 740.png 750.png 760.png 770.png 780.png 790.png 800.png 810.png 820.png 830.png 840.png 850.png 860.png 870.png 880.png 8870.png 8880.png 8890.png 890.png 8900.png 8910.png 8920.png 8930.png 8940.png 8950.png 8960.png 8970.png 8980.png 8990.png 900.png 9000.png 9010.png 9020.png 9030.png 9040.png 9050.png 9060.png 9070.png 9080.png 9090.png 910.png 920.png 930.png 940.png 950.png 960.png 970.png 980.png RMSE.png edge_nodes.jpg floe_interaction.png floe_set_up.png floe_set_up1.png flowchart_v.png general_edge_nodes.jpg pcc.png position_rmse_training.png velocity_rmse_training.png

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut