An Inverse Problem for the Prescribed Mean Curvature

An Inverse Problem for the Prescribed Mean Curvature
Notice: This research summary and analysis were automatically generated using AI technology. For absolute accuracy, please refer to the [Original Paper Viewer] below or the Original ArXiv Source.

We extend the recent study of inverse problems for minimal surfaces by considering the inverse source problem for the prescribed mean curvature equation \begin{equation*} \nabla \cdot \left[ \frac{\nabla u}{(1 + |\nabla u|^2)^{1/2}} \right] = H(x). \end{equation*} This work also represents the first treatment of inverse source problems for quasilinear equations. We prove that in two dimensions, the source function $H$ is uniquely determined by the associated Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. A notable feature of this problem is that although the equation is posed on an Euclidean domain, its linearization yields an anisotropic conductivity equation where the coefficient matrix corresponds to a Riemannian metric $g$ depending on the background solution. The main methodological contribution is the derivation of a coupled nonlinear system of algebraic and geometric partial differential equations from boundary measurements. Similar systems will naturally appear in other inverse problems for quasilinear equations. We solve the system using a Liouville type uniqueness result for conformal mappings, which recovers the source function uniquely.


💡 Research Summary

The paper addresses the inverse source problem for the prescribed mean curvature (PMC) equation in two dimensions, namely
∇·(∇u/√{1+|∇u|²}) = H(x) in Ω⊂ℝ²,
with Dirichlet data on ∂Ω. The central question is whether the source term H can be uniquely recovered from the Dirichlet‑to‑Neumann (DN) map Λ_H that sends a boundary function f to the normal derivative of the corresponding solution u_f. The authors prove a global uniqueness theorem: if two smooth source functions H and Ĥ agree to high order on the boundary and generate the same DN map for all sufficiently small perturbations of a fixed boundary datum f₀, then H≡Ĥ in Ω.

The proof proceeds via higher‑order linearization of the nonlinear PDE. First, the authors linearize the PMC equation around a smooth background solution u₀ (corresponding to f₀). The linearized operator takes the form
∂_a(g^{ab}∂_b v)=0, g^{ab}=∂_bF_a(∇u₀),
where F(p)=p√{1+|p|²}. The matrix g^{ab} is positive definite and can be interpreted as a Riemannian metric g on Ω that depends on u₀. Consequently, the first linearization is an anisotropic conductivity equation, or equivalently a Schrödinger equation (Δ_g+q)v=0 after a suitable gauge transformation.

Assuming Λ_H=Λ_Ĥ, the DN maps of the linearized equations coincide. By invoking recent results on the anisotropic Calderón problem (


Comments & Academic Discussion

Loading comments...

Leave a Comment