Long-run survival in limited stock market participation models with power utilities

Long-run survival in limited stock market participation models with power utilities
Notice: This research summary and analysis were automatically generated using AI technology. For absolute accuracy, please refer to the [Original Paper Viewer] below or the Original ArXiv Source.

We extend the limited participation model in Basak and Cuoco (1998) to allow for traders with different time-preference coefficients but identical constant relative risk-aversion coefficients. Our main result gives parameter restrictions which ensure the existence of a Radner equilibrium. As an application, we give further parameter restrictions which ensure all traders survive in the long run.


šŸ’” Research Summary

The paper revisits the classic limited‑participation Radner equilibrium model of Basak and Cuoco (1998) and introduces heterogeneity in agents’ time‑preference rates while keeping a common constant relative risk‑aversion (CRRA) coefficient γ∈(0,1). Two agents are considered: Agent 1 can trade both a risky stock and a risk‑free bond, whereas Agent 2 is restricted to the bond only. Both agents maximize power‑utility objectives of the form (c^{1‑γ})/(1‑γ) discounted at rates β₁ and β₂ respectively. The authors derive the agents’ optimal consumption‑investment policies, which are driven by a single state variable Y_t representing Agent 1’s consumption share.

A central technical contribution is the analysis of a singular, path‑dependent first‑order ordinary differential equation (ODE) that characterises the equilibrium price‑impact function h(y). The ODE (equations (2.9)–(2.10)) contains linear terms aā‚€(y), a₁(y), a non‑local term aā‚‚(h,y) defined via an integral of h, and a new cubic term proportional to the difference β₂‑β₁. By imposing the parameter restrictions

ā€ƒĪ“ = 2(β₂‑β₁)σ_D² ∈ (‑γ, 0)ā€ƒandā€ƒA = 2β₂ + σ_D² – (1‑γ)(2μ_Dā€‘Ī³Ļƒ_D²)/σ_D² ∈ (1+Γ‑2Γγ,ā€Æāˆž),

the authors prove (Lemma 2.3) that there exists a unique C¹ solution h on


Comments & Academic Discussion

Loading comments...

Leave a Comment