SurveyEval 자동 설문 생성 시스템 평가 종합 벤치마크

SurveyEval: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM-Generated Academic Surveys Jiahao Zhao∗ zhaojiahao2019@ia.ac.cn Beijing Wenge Technology Co., Ltd. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China Shuaixing Zhang∗ shuaixing.zhang@wenge.com Beijing Wenge Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China Nan Xu nan.xu@wenge.com Beijing Wenge Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China Lei Wang lei.wang@wenge.com Beijing Wenge Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China Abstract LLM-based automatic survey systems are transforming how users acquire information from the web by integrating retrieval, organi- zation, and content synthesis into end-to-end generation pipelines. While recent works focus on developing new generation pipelines, how to evaluate such complex systems remains a significant chal- lenge. To this end, we introduce SurveyEval, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates automatically generated surveys across three dimensions: overall quality, outline coherence, and refer- ence accuracy. We extend the evaluation across 7 subjects and augment the LLM-as-a-Judge framework with human references to strengthen evaluation–human alignment. Evaluation results show that while general long-text or paper-writing systems tend to pro- duce lower-quality surveys, specialized survey-generation systems are able to deliver substantially higher-quality results. We envi- sion SurveyEval as a scalable testbed to understand and improve automatic survey systems across diverse subjects and evaluation criteria. CCS Concepts • Computing methodologies →Natural language generation. Keywords Survey Evaluation, Automated Survey, Large Language Models ACM Reference Format: Jiahao Zhao, Shuaixing Zhang, Nan Xu, and Lei Wang. 2026. SurveyEval: Towards Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM-Generated Academic Surveys. In Proceedings of (preprint). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4 pages. https: //doi.org/XXXXXXX.XXXXXXX ∗Both authors contributed equally to this research. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org. preprint, in progress © 2026 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM ISBN 978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YYYY/MM https://doi.org/XXXXXXX.XXXXXXX 1 Introduction The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has demon- strated remarkable potential in complex text-generation tasks such as academic writing, literature reviews, and scientific reports [1]. LLM-based automatic survey systems are transforming how users acquire knowledge from vast information repositories by integrat- ing retrieval, organization, and content synthesis into streamlined end-to-end generation pipelines [4]. Both academia and industry have introduced various special- ized systems for survey generation. These automated writing sys- tems can be broadly categorized into three types: general long- text writing systems (e.g., Kimi [2], GLM [3]) that provide broader capabilities for extended text generation; paper-writing systems (e.g., Chengpian [5], Doubao Paper Mode [8]) that focus on struc- tured composition of complete research papers; and survey-writing agents (e.g., SurveyGo [9], SurveyX [7], Panshi ScienceOne [6]) specifically designed for academic survey generation. These sys- tems not only process large volumes of literature and extract key information, but also generate well-structured survey drafts com- plete with sectioned organization, citation annotations, and logical coherence. However, while recent research has primarily focused on de- veloping new generation pipelines, how to evaluate such complex systems remains a significant challenge. Existing evaluation ap- proaches often rely on ad-hoc human subjective scoring of individ- ual cases, lacking reusable quantitative metrics that could support cross-system comparison, performance attribution, and systematic improvement. These issues severely constrain quality assurance and capability enhancement of survey-writing systems. Therefore, es- tablishing a standardized evaluation benchmark for survey-writing systems is not only critical for ensuring output quality and reli- ability, but also provides the research community with a unified foundation for performance comparison and capability diagnosis. To address this gap, we introduce SurveyEval, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates automatically generated surveys across three dimensions: overall quality, outline coherence, and reference ac- curacy. We extend the evaluation across seven academic dis

…(Full text truncated)…

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.