📝 Original Info
- Title: User Data Sharing Frameworks: A Blockchain-Based Incentive Solution
- ArXiv ID: 1910.11927
- Date: 2025-10-29
- Authors: ** - Ajay Kumar Shrestha, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Canada (ajay.shrestha@usask.ca) - Julita Vassileva, Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Canada (julita.vassileva@usask.ca) **
📝 Abstract
Currently, there is no universal method to track who shared what, with whom, when and for what purposes in a verifiable way to create an individual incentive for data owners. A platform that allows data owners to control, delete, and get rewards from sharing their data would be an important enabler of user data-sharing. We propose a usable blockchain- and smart contracts-based framework that allows users to store research data locally and share without losing control and ownership of it. We have created smart contracts for building automatic verification of the conditions for data access that also naturally supports building up a verifiable record of the provenance, incentives for users to share their data and accountability of access. The paper presents a review of the existing work of research data sharing, the proposed blockchain-based framework and an evaluation of the framework by measuring the transaction cost for smart contracts deployment. The results show that nodes responded quickly in all tested cases with a befitting transaction cost.
💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into User Data Sharing Frameworks: A Blockchain-Based Incentive Solution.
Currently, there is no universal method to track who shared what, with whom, when and for what purposes in a verifiable way to create an individual incentive for data owners. A platform that allows data owners to control, delete, and get rewards from sharing their data would be an important enabler of user data-sharing. We propose a usable blockchain- and smart contracts-based framework that allows users to store research data locally and share without losing control and ownership of it. We have created smart contracts for building automatic verification of the conditions for data access that also naturally supports building up a verifiable record of the provenance, incentives for users to share their data and accountability of access. The paper presents a review of the existing work of research data sharing, the proposed blockchain-based framework and an evaluation of the framework by measuring the transaction cost for smart contracts deployment. The results show that nodes responded
📄 Full Content
User Data Sharing Frameworks: A Blockchain-
Based Incentive Solution
Ajay Kumar Shrestha
Department of Computer Science
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
ajay.shrestha@usask.ca
Julita Vassileva
Department of Computer Science
University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
julita.vassileva @usask.ca
Abstract— Currently, there is no universal method to track
who shared what, with whom, when and for what purposes in a
verifiable way to create an individual incentive for data owners.
A platform that allows data owners to control, delete, and get
rewards from sharing their data would be an important enabler
of user data-sharing. We propose a usable blockchain- and
smart contracts-based framework that allows users to store
research data locally and share without losing control and
ownership of it. We have created smart contracts for building
automatic verification of the conditions for data access that also
naturally supports building up a verifiable record of the
provenance, incentives for users to share their data and
accountability of access. The paper presents a review of the
existing work of research data sharing, the proposed
blockchain-based framework and an evaluation of the
framework by measuring the transaction cost for smart
contracts deployment. The results show that nodes responded
quickly in all tested cases with a befitting transaction cost.
Keywords— Data Sharing, User-controlled, Privacy, Trust,
Security, Blockchain, Smart Contract, Ethereum, MultiChain,
Transaction, Incentives
I. INTRODUCTION
The internet from its inception was aimed to facilitate
users in sharing data, and it enabled it through centralized (e.g.
FTP) or decentralized (e.g. email) services. With Web 2.0 [1]
or the social web, it became very easy to share creative
products on social sites (user-generated content on YouTube,
Wikipedia, blogs, as well as microblogging tools like Twitter
and Facebook). To achieve profit in the business model,
secondary data associated with the users’ profile and
behaviour are being collected and shared among the
enterprises, for a personalized advertisement that targets the
users based on that information. Much of the data are
contributed voluntarily by the user; others are obtained by the
system from the observation of user activities or inferred
through advanced analysis of volunteered or observed data
[2].
In different domains such as tourism, e-commerce, news
aggregators, dating services etc., the data analytics and the
personalization enhances the users’ interaction with the
system, and the overall quality of services being offered to the
users. The applications that aim for personalization need to
gather information about their users and create predictive user
models, used to adapt their functionality, presentation, or
offers to the specific users’ requirements [3]. The process of
user modeling requires collecting user data and making
inferences from this data by both finding patterns and
similarities across the many users of a service, or by
abstracting user features and building user profiles from the
history of the interaction of a user [4]. This is a slow process
prone to the “cold start” problem, and its variants (new user,
or new product/feature) [5]. To speed up learning about their
users, applications can share relevant data about the same user
with other applications, leading to the need for sharing user
interaction data and user profiles [6]. This sharing is very
problematic ethically, and the recent EU’s General Data
Protection Regulation (GDPR) makes explicit the problems
and trade-offs related to user privacy and control over data, as
well as fairness while preserving the richness of data. Our
research shows that these problems have not been addressed
by different proposed architectures and methods for user
profile data sharing.
Most importantly, in the scientific research domain,
research data sharing practices are much needed to maximize
the knowledge gains from the research efforts of millions of
researchers. Sharing research data can reduce duplicative
trials and accelerate discovery. In medicine and healthcare,
both personalized patient care and medical research can
benefit from ethical and privacy-preserving sharing of patient
data and data from clinical trials [7]. A flexible mechanism for
obtaining and renewing consent for data use and sharing is
required that provides appropriate and meaningful incentives
to capitalize from data sharing and ensures transparency for
users to be aware of which of their data has been accessed, by
whom, for what purpose and under what conditions.
Currently, there is no single trusted authority to ensure
ethical user data sharing. It has been demonstrated that the
creativity and the advancement of the technologies have given
birth to many computational backbones to ensure privacy and
data sharing model that include cl
…(Full text truncated)…
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.