Why Abeta42 Is Much More Toxic Than Abeta40

Reading time: 5 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Why Abeta42 Is Much More Toxic Than Abeta40
  • ArXiv ID: 1810.12404
  • Date: 2018-10-31
  • Authors: J. C. Phillips

📝 Abstract

Amyloid precursor with 770 amino acids dimerizes and aggregates, as do its c terminal 99 amino acids and amyloid 40,42 amino acids fragments. The titled question has been discussed extensively, and here it is addressed further using thermodynamic scaling theory to analyze mutational trends in structural factors and kinetics. Special attention is given to Family Alzheimer's Disease mutations outside amyloid 42. The scaling analysis is connected to extensive docking simulations which included membranes, thereby confirming their results and extending them to Amyloid precursor.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Why Abeta42 Is Much More Toxic Than Abeta40.

Amyloid precursor with 770 amino acids dimerizes and aggregates, as do its c terminal 99 amino acids and amyloid 40,42 amino acids fragments. The titled question has been discussed extensively, and here it is addressed further using thermodynamic scaling theory to analyze mutational trends in structural factors and kinetics. Special attention is given to Family Alzheimer’s Disease mutations outside amyloid 42. The scaling analysis is connected to extensive docking simulations which included membranes, thereby confirming their results and extending them to Amyloid precursor.

📄 Full Content

Alzheimer's disease, the most fatal neurodegenerative disorder, is caused by amyloid-β (Aβ) amyloidogenesis. Aβ is predominantly a 40 or 42 fragment cleaved from the 770 amino acid A4 precursor protein, which begins at A4 672D (renumbered as 1 in Aβ). This primary A4 cleavage was explained in [1] as the position of a hydrophilic extremum at 672D in the KD hydropathic profile (Fig. 4 there, partially reproduced below as Fig. 2, for the reader's convenience). The cterminal cleavage corresponds to a very strong and flat hydrophobic maximum at 40-42, associated in dilute solution with a large conspicuous uninterrupted hydrophobic patch which covers ~ 25% of the surface [2]. The hydropathic differences between Aβ 40 and 42 are small, but Aβ displays a dramatically increased propensity to form amyloid fibrils in vitro [3].

Considering the complexities of both sample preparation and measurement, recent progress in determining the structure of Aβ 42 fibrils [3,4] is remarkable (reviewed in [5]). The dimerized fibril is composed of two parts, with residues 15-42 forming a double-horseshoe-like cross-beta-sheet entity with maximally buried hydrophobic side chains. Residues 1-14 are partially ordered in a looser beta-strand conformation which adjusts reversed and staggered interdimer misfit.

Much study has been devoted to analyzing the molecular origin of the toxicity differences between Aβ 40 and 42 [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Fibril growth into protofibrils may depend critically on secondary nucleation steps such as amyloid monomer aggregation that is catalysed on the surface of the side of the fibril [16]. The aggregating monomers may be Aβ42 + a transmembrane tail extending 4-12 amino acids of A4 beyond 42A up to 54KKK56. There are many familial mutations in Aβ or adjacent to its hydrophilic 672 n-terminal, most of which are related to its salt bridge and beta strand side turn packing [3]. Three familial (FAD) mutations in the tail region occur at Val 46: Phe, Ile, Gl [14].

We wish to analyze the systematics of all seven nearby Val46 mutations of [14]: FAD Phe, Ile, Gln, and the artificial non-FAD Cys, Ser, Glu, Lys. The data in percents distinguish between Aβ1-42/totalAβ and Aβx-42/totalAβ. Here Aβx includes heterogeneous Ile, Val, Arg Glu, and benzenoid Phe, mutations at Asp site 1, while totalAβ means the sum of Aβ40,42 and 43, as shown in columns 1,2 in Table 1 of [14]. To gain insight into the mechanisms selecting Aβ42, we use four scales: (1) long range hydropathic [15], short range hydropathic [16], (3) beta strand buried [17] and (4) alpha helical buried [17] propensities. Another factor influencing the fraction of Aβ42 is the shape of the 46 mutation. Among the mutants only Phe contains a bulky benzoid side group [18]. We therefore correlated the results of [14] to four sets of mutants: FAD only and FAD + non-Fad, with and without Phe. This generates a table of 32 correlations, mostly weak. The complete results are included as supplementary information in Archiv, while here we discuss only highlights.

The strongest correlations involve ABx-42 (heterogeneous n-terminal). They also exclude Phe, and thus support the conclusion of [18]: the bulky benzenoid Phe side group makes the transmembrane handle 43-46 more brittle, and facilitates cleavage at 42, explains why F46 produces the largest yields for both Aβ1-42/totalAβ and Aβx-42/totalAβ. Excluding Phe leaves only three points: WT Val, Ile and Gln, but the correlations are strong. They range from 0.82 (beta strand and alpha helical buried) to 0.98 (long range hydropathicity). A nice touch is that the latter is markedly better than short range hydropathicity (0.90), and both are better than secondary strand or helical propensities.

All of these correlations are drastically reduced for Aβ1-42/totalAβ, by 0.3-0.5. Either restriction of amyloid β to n-terminal Asp site 1 is artificial, or there is some unknown factor affecting the restriction of the data to Asp 1. The correlations of all site 46 mutants (FAD + non-FAD, except Phe) is strongest for buried alpha helical propensity with Aβx-42/totalAβ (0.87), and again weaker for Aβ1-42/totalAβ (0.75).

We now turn to the broader perspective of the A4 precursor protein profile (Fig. 1). The striking feature here is the very strong hydrophobic peak centered near 740, which is shown in detail in The FAD mutations at Val46 lie near the 40-42 cleavage, but outside Aβ itself. Can we learn something from secondary (α and β) buried propensities? The natural value for W here is 13, because this is the beta strand horseshoe length [3,4]; see also Fig. 2 of [1]. A curious feature of the eight combined mutations FAD (including Phe) + artificial non-FAD is that they correlate well (0.74) with buried β strand propensity. This could be related to the Val46 extremum shown in Fig. 3. Surprisingly there is little correlation of Aβ1-42/totalAβ and Aβx-42/totalAβ with FAD only with or without Phe. Thus, in spite of

…(Full text truncated)…

📸 Image Gallery

cover.png

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut