📝 Original Info
- Title: Analysing Scientific Collaborations of New Zealand Institutions using Scopus Bibliometric Data
- ArXiv ID: 1709.02897
- Date: 2018-01-19
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
Scientific collaborations are among the main enablers of development in small national science systems. Although analysing scientific collaborations is a well-established subject in scientometrics, evaluations of scientific collaborations within a country remain speculative with studies based on a limited number of fields or using data too inadequate to be representative of collaborations at a national level. This study represents a unique view on the collaborative aspect of scientific activities in New Zealand. We perform a quantitative study based on all Scopus publications in all subjects for more than 1500 New Zealand institutions over a period of 6 years to generate an extensive mapping of scientific collaboration at a national level. The comparative results reveal the level of collaboration between New Zealand institutions and business enterprises, government institutions, higher education providers, and private not for profit organisations in 2010-2015. Constructing a collaboration network of institutions, we observe a power-law distribution indicating that a small number of New Zealand institutions account for a large proportion of national collaborations. Network centrality concepts are deployed to identify the most central institutions of the country in terms of collaboration. We also provide comparative results on 15 universities and Crown research institutes based on 27 subject classifications.
💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Analysing Scientific Collaborations of New Zealand Institutions using Scopus Bibliometric Data.
Scientific collaborations are among the main enablers of development in small national science systems. Although analysing scientific collaborations is a well-established subject in scientometrics, evaluations of scientific collaborations within a country remain speculative with studies based on a limited number of fields or using data too inadequate to be representative of collaborations at a national level. This study represents a unique view on the collaborative aspect of scientific activities in New Zealand. We perform a quantitative study based on all Scopus publications in all subjects for more than 1500 New Zealand institutions over a period of 6 years to generate an extensive mapping of scientific collaboration at a national level. The comparative results reveal the level of collaboration between New Zealand institutions and business enterprises, government institutions, higher education providers, and private not for profit organisations in 2010-2015. Constructing a collaborat
📄 Full Content
Analysing Scientific Collaborations of New Zealand
Institutions using Scopus Bibliometric Data
Samin Aref
Department of Computer Science and
Te Pūnaha Matatini
University of Auckland, New Zealand
sare618@aucklanduni.ac.nz
David Friggens
Ministry of Business Innovation
& Employment, Wellington
New Zealand
david.friggens@mbie.govt.nz
Shaun Hendy
Department of Physics and
Te Pūnaha Matatini
University of Auckland, New Zealand
shaun.hendy@auckland.ac.nz
ABSTRACT
Scientific collaborations are among the main enablers of
development in small national science systems. Although
analysing scientific collaborations is a well-established subject
in scientometrics, evaluations of scientific collaborations
within a country remain speculative with studies based on a
limited number of fields or using data too inadequate to be
representative of collaborations at a national level. This study
represents a unique view on the collaborative aspect of
scientific activities in New Zealand. We perform a quantitative
study based on all Scopus publications in all subjects for more
than 1500 New Zealand institutions over a period of 6 years to
generate an extensive mapping of scientific collaboration at a
national level. The comparative results reveal the level of
collaboration between New Zealand institutions and business
enterprises,
government
institutions,
higher
education
providers, and private not for profit organisations in
2010-2015.
Constructing
a
collaboration
network
of
institutions, we observe a power-law distribution indicating
that a small number of New Zealand institutions account for a
large proportion of national collaborations. Network centrality
concepts are deployed to identify the most central institutions
of the country in terms of collaboration. We also provide
comparative results on 15 universities and Crown research
institutes based on 27 subject classifications.
CCS CONCEPTS
• Information systems → Digital libraries and archives;
• Applied computing → Document management and text
processing; • General and reference → Surveys and
overviews;
KEYWORDS
Big data modelling, Scientific collaboration, Scientometrics,
Network analysis, Scopus, New Zealand
This is an author copy of the paper. The publisher’s verified version of
the paper can be accessed on https://doi.org/10.1145/3167918.3167920
ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored
by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As
such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to
publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for
Government purposes only.
ACM Reference format:
Samin Aref, David Friggens, and Shaun Hendy. 2018. Analysing
Scientific Collaborations of New Zealand Institutions using
Scopus Bibliometric Data. In Proceedings of ACSW 2018:
Australasian Computer Science Week 2018, January 29-February
2, 2018, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 10 pages.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3167918.3167920
1 INTRODUCTION
There is a growing body of literature that recognises the
importance of scientific collaboration in economic development
[1]. The scientific collaborations can be analysed based on
bibliometric data using network analysis tools and techniques
[2]. The main objective of analysing scientific collaboration is
to gain an understanding of how knowledge flows between
authors [3, 4], institutions [5] and countries [6, 7]. It also helps
quantifying research performance measures with a focus on the
collaborative aspect of research [8].
Scientific collaboration is seen not only as a performance
measure, but also a representation an entity outreach and
connections to other entities. Some studies focus on
collaborations within a country to compare researchers or
institutions and facilitate national research policy development.
Perc analysed collaboration at the level of individuals in
Slovenia [9] and similar study has been undertaken for Turkey
[10]. Collaborations can be investigated between different
countries. Park et al. investigated collaborations between China
and South Korea using bibliometric data [11]. Nguyen et al.
analysed collaborations of Vietnam with several other countries
[12].
The university-industry collaboration has been investigated
extensively as an essential connection between institutions of a
science system. Abramo et al. investigated the university-
industry collaboration in Italy [13] and found that university
researchers collaborating with industry have a higher research
performance. Investigating collaborations between specific
types of institutions in a country usually requires an analysis of
research outputs that represent a collaboration tie between the
two types of institutions [13]. Yoon and Park investigated the
collaboration between South Korea universities, industry, and
government using network analysis tools and techniques on
patent data [14]. The intermediate
…(Full text truncated)…
📸 Image Gallery
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.