This article proposes in depth comparative study of the most popular, used and analyzed Trust and Reputation System (TRS) according to the trust and reputation literature and in terms of specific trustworthiness criteria. This survey is realized relying on a selection of trustworthiness criteria that analyze and evaluate the maturity and effectiveness of TRS. These criteria describe the utility, the usability, the performance and the effectiveness of the TRS. We also provide a summary table of the compared TRS within a detailed and granular selection of trust and reputation aspects.
Deep Dive into State of the art of Trust and Reputation Systems in E-Commerce Context.
This article proposes in depth comparative study of the most popular, used and analyzed Trust and Reputation System (TRS) according to the trust and reputation literature and in terms of specific trustworthiness criteria. This survey is realized relying on a selection of trustworthiness criteria that analyze and evaluate the maturity and effectiveness of TRS. These criteria describe the utility, the usability, the performance and the effectiveness of the TRS. We also provide a summary table of the compared TRS within a detailed and granular selection of trust and reputation aspects.
State of the art of Trust and Reputation
Systems in E-Commerce Context
H. Rahimi* and H. El Bakkali,
Information Security Research Team, University Mohamed V Rabat ENSIAS, Rabat, Morocco.
h.elbakkali@um5s.net.ma *hasnae.rahimi@gmail.com
Abstract-This article proposes in depth comparative study of the most popular, used and analyzed Trust and
Reputation System (TRS) according to the trust and reputation literature and in terms of specific trustworthiness
criteria. This survey is realized relying on a selection of trustworthiness criteria that analyze and evaluate the
maturity and effectiveness of TRS. These criteria describe the utility, the usability, the performance and the
effectiveness of the TRS. We also provide a summary table of the compared TRS within a detailed and granular
selection of trust and reputation aspects.
I. INTRODUCTION
Open electronic markets, online collaboration systems, distributed peer-to-peer applications, online social media
require the establishment of mutual trust between service providers and service consumers. In fact, the major
concerns of web-based services especially e-commerce applications is to overcome the inherent uncertainties and
untrustworthiness risks and enhance the system’s robustness and resistance against fraudulent users and
distrustful ones. Besides, e-commerce platforms aim at adopting the most efficient approach that helps detect and
analyze users’ intentions in order to reveal and understand deceitful ones. Otherwise, the underlying purpose of
e-commerce services which is to maximize the profit and the rate of purchase, would be threatened and
deteriorated by fraudulent and ill-intentioned users.
For this reason, Recommender Systems such as Trust and Reputation Systems (TRS), provide essential input for
computational trust so as to predict future behaviors of peers basing on the past actions of a peer [1]. In a
reputation network, information about these actions can also be received from other members of a reputation
network who have transacted with the peer. However, the credibility of this third-party information must be
critically assessed. The underlying goal in all reputation systems is to predict a peer’s future transactions taking
into account his past actions and applying algorithms relying on probabilities approaches.
To gather these first-hand transactions is a tedious and costly task especially when involving the malicious and
fraudulent peers. To overcome this limitation, users share their experiences through the reputation system, which
aims to detect and effectively isolate misbehaving customers and users. Indeed, e-commerce users refer to this
shared information as recommendations on which they rely in order to make the right purchase decision. As no
user in e-commerce environment is fully trusted, recommendations and reviews credibility and trustworthiness
must be critically assessed. At this purpose, Trust and Reputation Systems have been widely used for various e-
commerce applications in order to assess the credibility and trustworthiness of the provided reputation
information. Furthermore, this task is becoming increasingly important for the majority of e-services, but
especially for e-commerce platforms where resources and business benefice value depend on making correct
decisions. As a matter of fact, deliberately providing fake and dishonest ratings and reviews is a serious and
crucial security issue that threaten the trust establishment and propagation in e-commerce environment. In fact,
this misbehaving attitude would systematically falsify the trust and reputation assessment of the reviewed
products and services in e-commerce applications. As a result, this falsification would impact customers’ trust
with regards to the purchase decision-making. Moreover, human users have specific reasons for deliberately
skewing their comments and they can change their intentional behavior over time and according to changing
circumstances that impact the product’s quality and the customer’s interests as well. Besides, customers can also
be discriminative against particular service providers while cooperating with others.
In order to distinguish honest reputation information from dishonest one, we need a robust TRS that applies
intelligent detection algorithms, either supervised, unsupervised or semi-supervised. These algorithms aim to
analyze the trustworthiness of the reputation information provided in the form of reviews, recommendations and
numeric ratings. In fact, a meticulous trustworthiness analysis of the shared information achieved by TRS, would
certainly increase the system’s robustness and resistance against fraudulent reviewers. Moreover, the underlying
computational goal of TRS is to generate a trustful evaluation of the reputation of a product or a service in e-
commerce. Indeed, TRS incarnate a combination of two dependant systems: Reputation systems which is
generally ba
…(Full text truncated)…
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.