Diagnosis of aerospace structure defects by a HPC implemented soft computing algorithm

Reading time: 5 minute
...

📝 Abstract

This study concerns with the diagnosis of aerospace structure defects by applying a HPC parallel implementation of a novel learning algorithm, named U-BRAIN. The Soft Computing approach allows advanced multi-parameter data processing in composite materials testing. The HPC parallel implementation overcomes the limits due to the great amount of data and the complexity of data processing. Our experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the U-BRAIN parallel implementation as defect classifier in aerospace structures. The resulting system is implemented on a Linux-based cluster with multi-core architecture.

💡 Analysis

This study concerns with the diagnosis of aerospace structure defects by applying a HPC parallel implementation of a novel learning algorithm, named U-BRAIN. The Soft Computing approach allows advanced multi-parameter data processing in composite materials testing. The HPC parallel implementation overcomes the limits due to the great amount of data and the complexity of data processing. Our experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the U-BRAIN parallel implementation as defect classifier in aerospace structures. The resulting system is implemented on a Linux-based cluster with multi-core architecture.

📄 Content

Diagnosis of aerospace structure defects by a HPC implemented soft computing algorithm

Gianni D’Angelo, Salvatore Rampone University of Sannio Dept. of Science and Technology Benevento, Italy {dangelo, rampone}@unisannio.it

Abstract— This study concerns with the diagnosis of aerospace structure defects by applying a HPC parallel implementation of a novel learning algorithm, named U-BRAIN. The Soft Computing approach allows advanced multi-parameter data processing in composite materials testing. The HPC parallel implementation overcomes the limits due to the great amount of data and the complexity of data processing. Our experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of the U-BRAIN parallel implementation as defect classifier in aerospace structures. The resulting system is implemented on a Linux-based cluster with multi-core architecture. Keywords— Non-destructive testing; learning algorithm; parallel computing; HPC; signature-based classifier; eddy current. I. INTRODUCTION The use of composite materials in the aerospace industry is growing rapidly, especially in the production of the components the use of which sees them subjected to heavy loads and efforts. Due to their unique mechanical properties, namely, high strength-to-weight ratio, high fracture toughness, and excellent corrosion resistance properties, they are used at critical points in the construction of an aircraft [1,2]. They are widely used in the outer covering of the aircraft, such as flaps, hatches, sides of the engine, floors, rudders, elevators, ailerons etc. The composite material design and manufacturing technologies have matured to a level that Boeing Company is using composite material for 50% of the primary structure in its 787 program. Unfortunately, there is a great variety of possible manufacturing defects that regards those materials [3]. The most widespread types of defects are the following:
• Delamination between plies of outer skin, parallel to surface; • Matrix crack; • Disbanding between the outer skin and the honeycomb core; • Fiber fracture; • Cracked honeycomb core parallel to the inspection surface; • Crushed honeycomb core in parallel to the area; • Disbonding between inner skin and honeycomb core; • Fluid ingress in honeycomb core. • Damages induced by the stress, environment influences and others. • Wear, scratch, indentation and cleft • Creep deformation. These defects are difficult to diagnose and analysis is strongly influenced by many factors that may also arise from the complexity of manufacturing processes. In addition, some techniques of inspection and/or some detection equipment may have systematic errors or accidental ones. The presence of defects and damages pose a significant threat to the safety of composite structures. Composite materials are mostly used in aerospace structures, and their structural reliability and safety is particularly critical. Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) allows one to implement a control over the material at different stages of its evolution and permits to safeguard the integrity of the structure during the analysis. Visual and strike method, optical holography, X-ray, ultrasonic wave, eddy current testing and infrared detection, X- ray and ultrasonic C-scan are the most methods used. Due to the heterogeneity of the composite structure, the Non- Destructive Testing of composites are very complex and sometimes several methods will take to test the same component [4]. For this reason, the accuracy of diagnosis of composite materials is determined not only by physical methods to obtain experimental data but also with mathematical models and advanced methods of data processing [5]. The analysis of the data, generally obtained from tests based on multi-parameter control, is one of the possible ways to increase the effectiveness and reliability of non-destructive testing of composites. The methods of spectrum analysis and pattern recognition are often used in multi-parametric control for data processing [6]. However, the application of these methods requires sophisticated techniques for processing signals that lead to the solution of nonlinear equations complex with a high number of variables [7]. The difficult and sometimes impossible solution of these equations lead to a reduction in the efficiency of the system of non-destructive testing. These difficulties also do not allow the automation of the test and deprive their of the same dynamism typical of a system able to adapt to changes in the parameters of the testing system at run-time. Non-destructive testing of composites should be performed with methods able to collect the most comprehensive information about new defects, expand existed base of defects and increase diagnostics system precision in runtime. Furthermore data processing in defects diagnosis has to deal with great amount of data and numerous elements are pro

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut