Higher central extensions and Hopf formulae
Higher extensions and higher central extensions, which are of importance to non-abelian homological algebra, are studied, and some fundamental properties are proven. As an application, a direct proof of the invariance of the higher Hopf formulae is obtained.
š” Research Summary
The paper develops a systematic theory of higher extensions and higher central extensions within the framework of nonāabelian homological algebra, and uses this theory to give a direct proof of the invariance of the higher Hopf formulae. After recalling the basic setting of semiāabelian categories and a chosen Birkhoff subcategoryāÆš
together with its reflectorāÆI:šāš
, the authors introduce the notion of an nāfold extension. An nāfold extension is a ladder of regular epimorphisms
Xā ā Xāāā ā ⦠ā Xā ā Xā,
each possessing a kernel, and the whole ladder is required to be a regular diagram. This generalises the classical oneādimensional extension and provides the basic object for higher homological constructions.
The central contribution is the definition of a higher central extension: an nāfold extension whose each kernel commutes with the š ānormal subobjects, i.e. each stage is š ācentral. Using the commutator calculus associated with the reflector I, the authors construct a canonical ācentralisationā functor C that assigns to any nāfold extension its maximal š ācentral part. They prove three fundamental properties: (1) existence and uniqueness of C(e) for any nāfold extension e, (2) that the collection of higher central extensions forms a full reflective subcategory of the category of regular nāfold extensions, and (3) closure under pullbacks, composition and finite coproducts, showing that the subcategory is itself semiāabelian.
With this machinery in place, the paper turns to the higher Hopf formulae, which express the nāth homology Hā(A) of an object A in terms of a projective presentation P and the kernels appearing in a higher central extension C. The classical Hopf formula for Hā(A) is recovered when nāÆ=āÆ1. For nāÆā„āÆ2 the authors obtain
Hā(A)āÆā
āÆKer(Cā)āÆ/
Comments & Academic Discussion
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment