Prescribing the behaviour of geodesics in negative curvature

Reading time: 3 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Prescribing the behaviour of geodesics in negative curvature
  • ArXiv ID: 0706.2579
  • Date: 2014-11-11
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

Given a family of (almost) disjoint strictly convex subsets of a complete negatively curved Riemannian manifold M, such as balls, horoballs, tubular neighborhoods of totally geodesic submanifolds, etc, the aim of this paper is to construct geodesic rays or lines in M which have exactly once an exactly prescribed (big enough) penetration in one of them, and otherwise avoid (or do not enter too much in) them. Several applications are given, including a definite improvement of the unclouding problem of [PP1], the prescription of heights of geodesic lines in a finite volume such M, or of spiraling times around a closed geodesic in a closed such M. We also prove that the Hall ray phenomenon described by Hall in special arithmetic situations and by Schmidt-Sheingorn for hyperbolic surfaces is in fact only a negative curvature property.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Prescribing the behaviour of geodesics in negative curvature.

Given a family of (almost) disjoint strictly convex subsets of a complete negatively curved Riemannian manifold M, such as balls, horoballs, tubular neighborhoods of totally geodesic submanifolds, etc, the aim of this paper is to construct geodesic rays or lines in M which have exactly once an exactly prescribed (big enough) penetration in one of them, and otherwise avoid (or do not enter too much in) them. Several applications are given, including a definite improvement of the unclouding problem of [PP1], the prescription of heights of geodesic lines in a finite volume such M, or of spiraling times around a closed geodesic in a closed such M. We also prove that the Hall ray phenomenon described by Hall in special arithmetic situations and by Schmidt-Sheingorn for hyperbolic surfaces is in fact only a negative curvature property.

📄 Full Content

) ≤ e -t sinh d(x, y) ≤ 1 2 e -t+d (x,y) .

´ (p, q) ≤ e -d(a,p) sinh d(a, a ′ ) ≤ e -d(a,m)+d(m,p) sinh d(a, a ′ ) ≤ e -t+ǫ/2 sinh ǫ .

À Ò d(m, q) ≤ d(m, p) + d(p, q) ≤ e -t (1 + e ǫ/2 ) sinh ǫ¸ Ò Ø Ö ×ÙÐØ ÓÐÐÓÛ× Ý Ø ××ÙÑÔØ ÓÒ ÓÒ d(a, b)º

≤ 2 e t-t - k sinh c 1 + c 2 e -τ sinh c 1 . 2,3,7,11,19,43,67,163 Ø Rat e × Ø × Ø Ó Ð Ñ ÒØ× r = p/q ´ÑÓ ÙÐÓ (Γ R,I ) ∞ µ Û Ø (p, q) ∈ × I ×Ù Ø Ø p, q = º ÙÖØ ÖÑÓÖ ´× ÀÈ¿Ä Ñº ¾º½¼℄µ D(r) = 2 log |q| . (p,q) ∈ ′ ×I ′ : ∃ r,s∈ ′ N (qr-qpq -1 s)=1 , N (q)→∞ N (q)N (xpq -1 )

📸 Image Gallery

cover.png

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut