Inconsistencies of the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator

Reading time: 1 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Inconsistencies of the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator
  • ArXiv ID: 1302.6391
  • Date: 2013-05-09
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

One way of evaluating individual scientists is the determination of the number of highly cited publications, where the threshold is given by a large reference set. It is shown that this indicator behaves in a counterintuitive way, leading to inconsistencies in the ranking of different scientists.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Inconsistencies of the Highly-Cited-Publications Indicator.

One way of evaluating individual scientists is the determination of the number of highly cited publications, where the threshold is given by a large reference set. It is shown that this indicator behaves in a counterintuitive way, leading to inconsistencies in the ranking of different scientists.

📄 Full Content

One way of evaluating individual scientists is the determination of the number of highly cited publications, where the threshold is given by a large reference set. It is shown that this indicator behaves in a counterintuitive way, leading to inconsistencies in the ranking of different scientists.

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut