Fractal-Based Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms
📝 Original Info
- Title: Fractal-Based Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms
- ArXiv ID: 1304.8092
- Date: 2013-05-01
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
In this paper, a novel method for edge detection of microcalcification clusters in mammogram images is presented using the concept of Fractal Dimension and Hurst co-efficient that enables to locate the microcalcifications in the mammograms. This technique detects the edges accurately than the ones obtained by the conventional Sobel method. Generally, Sobel method detects the edges of the regions/objects in an image using the Fudge factor that assumes its value as 0.5, by default. In this proposed technique, the Fudge factor is suitably replaced with Hurst Co-efficient, which is computed as the difference of Fractal dimension and the topological dimension of a given input image. These two dimensions are image-dependent, and hence the respective Hurst co-efficient too varies with respect to images. Hence, the image-dependent Hurst co-efficient based Sobel method is proved to produce better results than the Fudge factor based Sobel method. The results of the proposed method substantiate the merit of the proposed technique.💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Fractal-Based Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms.In this paper, a novel method for edge detection of microcalcification clusters in mammogram images is presented using the concept of Fractal Dimension and Hurst co-efficient that enables to locate the microcalcifications in the mammograms. This technique detects the edges accurately than the ones obtained by the conventional Sobel method. Generally, Sobel method detects the edges of the regions/objects in an image using the Fudge factor that assumes its value as 0.5, by default. In this proposed technique, the Fudge factor is suitably replaced with Hurst Co-efficient, which is computed as the difference of Fractal dimension and the topological dimension of a given input image. These two dimensions are image-dependent, and hence the respective Hurst co-efficient too varies with respect to images. Hence, the image-dependent Hurst co-efficient based Sobel method is proved to produce better results than the Fudge factor based Sobel method. The results of the proposed method substantiate t