Design for a Darwinian Brain: Part 1. Philosophy and Neuroscience
📝 Original Info
- Title: Design for a Darwinian Brain: Part 1. Philosophy and Neuroscience
- ArXiv ID: 1303.7200
- Date: 2013-03-29
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
Physical symbol systems are needed for open-ended cognition. A good way to understand physical symbol systems is by comparison of thought to chemistry. Both have systematicity, productivity and compositionality. The state of the art in cognitive architectures for open-ended cognition is critically assessed. I conclude that a cognitive architecture that evolves symbol structures in the brain is a promising candidate to explain open-ended cognition. Part 2 of the paper presents such a cognitive architecture.💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Design for a Darwinian Brain: Part 1. Philosophy and Neuroscience.Physical symbol systems are needed for open-ended cognition. A good way to understand physical symbol systems is by comparison of thought to chemistry. Both have systematicity, productivity and compositionality. The state of the art in cognitive architectures for open-ended cognition is critically assessed. I conclude that a cognitive architecture that evolves symbol structures in the brain is a promising candidate to explain open-ended cognition. Part 2 of the paper presents such a cognitive architecture.
📄 Full Content
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.