Inconsistency of Carnots theorems proof by R. Clausius

Reading time: 2 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Inconsistency of Carnots theorems proof by R. Clausius
  • ArXiv ID: 1303.2123
  • Date: 2013-03-12
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

R. Clausius proved Carnot's theorem basing on postulate "Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a colder to a hotter body". Alexander Gukhman demonstrated that Carnot's theorem can be proved based on the postulate "Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a hotter to a colder body". He concluded that Carnot's theorem does not follow from Clausius' postulate. The following paper gives a detailed justification of Gukhman's derivation.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Inconsistency of Carnots theorems proof by R. Clausius.

R. Clausius proved Carnot’s theorem basing on postulate “Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a colder to a hotter body”. Alexander Gukhman demonstrated that Carnot’s theorem can be proved based on the postulate “Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a hotter to a colder body”. He concluded that Carnot’s theorem does not follow from Clausius’ postulate. The following paper gives a detailed justification of Gukhman’s derivation.

📄 Full Content

R. Clausius proved Carnot's theorem basing on postulate "Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a colder to a hotter body". Alexander Gukhman demonstrated that Carnot's theorem can be proved based on the postulate "Heat cannot, of itself, pass from a hotter to a colder body". He concluded that Carnot's theorem does not follow from Clausius' postulate. The following paper gives a detailed justification of Gukhman's derivation.

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut