Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability

Reading time: 2 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability
  • ArXiv ID: 1302.6848
  • Date: 2013-02-28
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism for reasoning with normality defaults of the form "typically if phi then + (with strength cf)" where 6 is a positive integer. The system has a critical shortcoming in that it does not sanction inheritance across exceptional subclasses. In this paper we propose an extension to System Z+ that rectifies this shortcoming by extracting additional conditions between worlds from the defaults database. We show that the additional constraints do not change the notion of the consistency of a database. We also make comparisons with competing default reasoning systems.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Exceptional Subclasses in Qualitative Probability.

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism for reasoning with normality defaults of the form “typically if phi then + (with strength cf)” where 6 is a positive integer. The system has a critical shortcoming in that it does not sanction inheritance across exceptional subclasses. In this paper we propose an extension to System Z+ that rectifies this shortcoming by extracting additional conditions between worlds from the defaults database. We show that the additional constraints do not change the notion of the consistency of a database. We also make comparisons with competing default reasoning systems.

📄 Full Content

System Z+ [Goldszmidt and Pearl, 1991, Goldszmidt, 1992] is a formalism for reasoning with normality defaults of the form "typically if phi then + (with strength cf)" where 6 is a positive integer. The system has a critical shortcoming in that it does not sanction inheritance across exceptional subclasses. In this paper we propose an extension to System Z+ that rectifies this shortcoming by extracting additional conditions between worlds from the defaults database. We show that the additional constraints do not change the notion of the consistency of a database. We also make comparisons with competing default reasoning systems.

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut