On the Complexity of Planar Covering of Small Graphs

On the Complexity of Planar Covering of Small Graphs
Notice: This research summary and analysis were automatically generated using AI technology. For absolute accuracy, please refer to the [Original Paper Viewer] below or the Original ArXiv Source.

The problem Cover(H) asks whether an input graph G covers a fixed graph H (i.e., whether there exists a homomorphism G to H which locally preserves the structure of the graphs). Complexity of this problem has been intensively studied. In this paper, we consider the problem PlanarCover(H) which restricts the input graph G to be planar. PlanarCover(H) is polynomially solvable if Cover(H) belongs to P, and it is even trivially solvable if H has no planar cover. Thus the interesting cases are when H admits a planar cover, but Cover(H) is NP-complete. This also relates the problem to the long-standing Negami Conjecture which aims to describe all graphs having a planar cover. Kratochvil asked whether there are non-trivial graphs for which Cover(H) is NP-complete but PlanarCover(H) belongs to P. We examine the first nontrivial cases of graphs H for which Cover(H) is NP-complete and which admit a planar cover. We prove NP-completeness of PlanarCover(H) in these cases.


💡 Research Summary

The paper investigates the computational complexity of the planar version of the graph covering problem, denoted PlanarCover(H). A covering of a graph H by a graph G is a homomorphism f : V(G) → V(H) that is locally bijective: for every vertex v of G, the closed neighbourhood N_G


Comments & Academic Discussion

Loading comments...

Leave a Comment