Convex hyperspaces of probability measures and extensors in the asymptotic category
The objects of the Dranishnikov asymptotic category are proper metric spaces and the morphisms are asymptotically Lipschitz maps. In this paper we provide an example of an asymptotically zero-dimensional space (in the sense of Gromov) whose space of …
Authors: Duv{s}an Repovv{s}, Mykhailo Zarichnyi
CONVEX HYPERSP A CES OF PROBABIL ITY ME ASURES AND EXTENSORS IN THE ASYMPTOTIC CA TEGOR Y DU ˇ SAN REPOV ˇ S AND MYKHA ILO ZARICHNYI Abstract. The ob jects of the Dranis hnik ov asymptotic category are prop er metric spaces and the mor phi s ms are asymptotica lly Lipschitz maps. In this paper we provide an exam- ple of an asymptotically zero-dim ensional space (in the sense of Gromo v) whose space of compact con v ex subsets of probabilit y measures is not an absolute extensor in the asymp- totic category in the sense of Dranishniko v. 1. I ntroduction The notion of absolute extensor pla ys an impor tant role in different br a nches of mathemat- ics. In as y mptotic top ology , the absolute extensor s are used in constructing the ho motopy theory and the asymptotic dimension theory . Among the t wo categories widely use d in a s - ymptotic category , the Dr anishnikov and the R o e categor ies (see the definition b elow), it turns out that it is the Dranishniko v categor y (the category of prop er metric spaces and the asymptotically Lips ch itz maps) in which a richer extensor theor y can b e developed. It was prov ed in [1 0] that in gener a l, the space o f probability measures of a metric space is not a n absolute extensor for the Dra nishniko v category . This provided a negative answer to a question formulated b y Dranishniko v [2, P roblem 12 ], in connection with ex istence o f the homo topy extens io n theorem in this ca teg ory . This leads to an op en pro blem of sea r ch- ing functorial constructions that preserve the class of a bsolute extensors in the as ymptotic categorie s. In the pr esent pap er w e deal with the hyperspa ces o f compact co nv ex subsets of pr obability measures. Note that these hyper spaces play a n impo r tant ro le in the decision theory , math- ematical economics and finance, in pa rticular, in the maximum (maxmin) exp ected utility theory (cf. e.g. [3]). In the case of compact metric spa ces a s well a s in the case of compact spaces o f weight ω 1 , the h yp erspac e s of compact co nvex subsets of proba bility measures are known to b e abso- lute extensor s [1]. How ever, the extension prop erties of thes e h yp erspac es in the as ymptotic category remained unknown. Our a im is to demonstra te tha t the exa mple presented in [10] also works for the hyp e rspaces compact conv ex s ubsets o f pr obability measures. Thu s the main r esult of this pap er is that the space s mentioned a bove a re not in g e neral, a symptotic extensors in the as y mptotic categ o ry . Date : Nov ember 20, 2018. 2010 Mathematics Subje ct Classific ation. Primary: 46E27, 46E30; Secondary: 54C55, 54E35. Key wor ds and phr ases. Compact con v ex set, probability measure, asympto tically zero-dimensional space, absolute extensor. 1 2 D. REPO V ˇ S AND M. ZARICHNYI 2. Preliminaries 2.1. Asymptotic category . T ogether with Ro e’s ca tegory of prop er metric s pa ces a nd coarse maps [8], the as y mptotic category A in tro duced by Dranishnikov [2] turned out to be a n imp ortant universe for developing asymptotic to po logy . A typical metric will b e denoted by d . A map f : X → Y betw een metr ic spaces is called ( λ, ε )- Lipschitz for λ > 0, ε ≥ 0 if d ( f ( x ) , f ( x ′ )) ≤ λd ( x, x ′ ) + ε for every x, x ′ ∈ X . A map is called asymptotic al ly Lipschitz if it is ( λ, ε )-Lipschitz for some λ, ε > 0. The (1 , 0)-Lipsc hitz maps are als o called short . The set of all sho r t functions on a metric space X is de no ted by LIP( X ). A metric space is pr op er if every closed ball in it is compact. A map of metric spaces is (metrically) pr op er if the preimages o f the b ounded sets a re b ounded. The ob jects of the category A are the pro per metric spa ces and the morphisms ar e the pr op er asymptotically Lipschitz maps. A metric space Y (not necessar ily an ob ject of A ) is a n absolute extensor (AE) for the category A if for every pro p er a symptotically Lipschitz ma p f : A → Y defined on a c lo sed subset o f a pr op er metric space X there exists a prop er asymptotically Lipschitz extensio n ¯ f : X → Y of f . 2.2. Asymptotic dimens ion. The notio n o f a symptotic dimension was introduced by Gro- mov [4]. Let X b e a metr ic spac e . A family C of subsets of X is said to b e uniformly b ounde d if there exists M > 0 such that dia m A ≤ M for e very A ∈ C . Given D > 0, we say that a family C of subsets of X is D -disjoint if inf { d ( a, a ′ ) | a ∈ A, a ′ ∈ A ′ } > D for every A, A ′ ∈ C , A 6 = A ′ . W e say that the asymptotic dimension of X is ≤ n (written asdim X ≤ n ) if for every D > 0 there exists a cover U of X s uch that U = U 0 ∪ · · · ∪ U n , where every family U i is D -discrete. If we requir e in the definition of the absolute extenso r that asdim X ≤ n , then the definition of the absolute extensor in asymptotic dimension n (briefly AE ( n )) is o bta ined. It is easy to see that for a prop er metric space X , the inequality asdim X ≤ 0 is equiv a lent to the c ondition that for every C > 0 the dia meters of the C -chains in X (i.e. the sequences x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x k with d ( x i , x i +1 ) ≤ C for every i = 1 , 2 , . . . , k − 1) are b ounded from ab ov e. 2.3. Con v ex h yp erspaces of probabil it y measures. Let P ( X ) denote the space o f pro b- ability mea sures of compact supp or ts on a metriza ble space X . F or a ny x ∈ X , we denote the Dirac measure concentrated at x b y δ x . If d is a metric o n X , we deno te b y ˆ d the Ka n torovich metric ge nerated by d , ˆ d ( µ, ν ) = sup Z ϕdµ − Z ϕdν | ϕ ∈ LIP( X ) (cf. e.g . [5]). By cc P ( X ) we denote the set of all nonempty co mpa ct conv ex subsets in P ( X ); as usual, a subse t A ⊂ P ( X ) is co n vex if tµ + (1 − t ) ν ∈ A , for all µ, ν ∈ P ( X ) and t ∈ [0 , 1]. The s e t cc P ( X ) is endow ed with the Hausdorff metric, which w e shall deno te by ˆ d H : ˆ d H ( A, B ) = inf { r > 0 | A ⊂ O r ( B ) , B ⊂ O r ( A ) } (here O t ( Y ) sta nds for the t -neighborho o d of Y ⊂ P ( X )). Note tha t, clea rly , the map x 7→ { δ x } : X → cc P ( X ) is an iso metric embedding. Given a map f : X → Y of metric spaces, we de fine the map P ( f ) : P ( X ) → P ( Y ) a s follows: R ϕdP ( f )( µ ) = R ϕf dµ . The map cc P ( f ) : cc P ( X ) → cc P ( Y ) is then defined b y the HYPERSP A CES OF PROBABILITY MEASURES AND EXTENSORS 3 formula: cc P ( f )( A ) = { P ( f )( µ ) | µ ∈ A } . It c a n b e easily seen that the ma p cc P ( f ) is shor t if such is f . Let b : P ( R n ) → R n denote the bary cent er map. Recall tha t this map assig ns to every µ ∈ P ( R n ) the unique p o int b ( µ ) with the pr op erty that L ( b ( µ )) = R Ldµ , for e very contin uous linear functional L on R n . Since b is known to b e contin uous and linear, the image b ( A ) of every A ∈ cc P ( R n ) is a compa ct co nv ex subset of R n , i.e., a n element of the space cc( R n ) o f compact co nv e x subsets in R n endow ed with the Hausdorff metric. Let p : cc( R n ) → R n denote the map defined by the condition: y = π ( A ) ⇔ y ∈ A a nd k y k = inf {k z k | z ∈ A } . The pro of o f the following statement uses simple geometr ic a rguments and will therefore be o mitted. Lemma 2.1. The map π is wel l- define d and short. 3. The Example Our example describ ed b elow is a modifica tion of the second author’s example of a pr op er metric space who se space of pro bability meas ur es is not an AE (even AE (0)) in the asymp- totic category [11]. F or the sake of completeness we shall provide her e the details of the construction. F or e very n , the Euclidean spa c e R n can natura lly b e identified with the subspace { ( x i ) | x i = 0 for all j > n } of the space ℓ 2 . W e endow the subspace X ′ = S n ∈ N { n 2 } × R n ⊂ R × ℓ 2 with the metric d (( m, ( x i )) , ( n, ( y i ))) = ( | m − n | 2 + k ( x i ) − ( y i ) k 2 ) 1 / 2 . Obviously , X is a pro p er metric space. F or every n we denote b y p n : X ′ → R n a map defined by the for m ula p n ( m, ( x i )) = ( x 1 , . . . , x n ). Clearly , p n is a sho rt map. It was shown in [6] (cf. Theor em 1.5 therein) that for any n ≥ 2 there exists a metric space X n which co nt ains the Euclidean space R n as a metric s ubspace and such that there is no ( λ, ε )-Lipschitz retractio n from X n onto R n with λ < n 1 / 4 . In the sequel we shall need an explicit cons truction of these spaces. F ollowing [6], for every natural k and natur al n ≥ 2 we define graphs G n,k as follows: the se t o f vertices V ( G n,k ) is the union of I ( G n,k ) and T ( G n,k ), where I ( G n,k ) = { x = ( x 1 , . . . , x n ) ∈ R n | | x i | = k for all i } , T ( G n,k ) = { x = ( x 1 , . . . , x n ) ∈ R n | | x i | = 2 k for a ll i } ; the set o f edges E ( G n,k ) is defined by the co nditio n: { x, y } ∈ E ( G n,k ) if and only if x, y ∈ V ( G n,k ) and either k x − y k = 2 k or y = 2 x (we supp os e that the spaces R n are endow ed with the E uclidean metr ic ). The set V ( G n,k ) is equipp ed with the metric d = d n,k , d ( x, y ) = inf ( l X i =1 k x i − 1 − x i k ∞ | ( x = x 0 , x 1 , . . . , x l = y ) is a path in G n,k ) (as usua l, k x k ∞ denotes the max- norm of x ∈ R n .) Define s paces X and Y a s follows: X = ∞ [ n =2 ∞ [ k = n { n 2 } × T ( G n 2 ,k 2 ) , Y = ∞ [ n =2 ∞ [ k = n { n 2 } × V ( G n 2 ,k 2 ) 4 D. REPO V ˇ S AND M. ZARICHNYI where the metric on X is inher ited from X ′ and the metric on Y is the maximal metric that agrees with the alr eady defined metric on X and the metric d n,k on every V ( G n,k ). It easily follows fro m the construction that X and Y are prop er metric spaces, i.e. ob jects o f the category A . W e a re go ing to s how that a sdim Y = 0 (and consequently asdim X = 0). Let C > 0 and suppo se that y 1 , . . . , y m is a C - chain in Y . Deno te by k the minimal natural num b e r such that C < ( k + 1) 2 . If { y 1 , . . . , y n } ⊂ k [ j =2 k [ l = j { j 2 } × V ( G j 2 ,l 2 ) then dia m { y 1 , . . . , y n } ≤ p ( k 2 ) + (3 k 2 ) 2 ≤ √ 10 C . Otherwise { y 1 , . . . , y n } ∩ Y \ k [ j =2 k [ l = j { j 2 } × V ( G j 2 ,l 2 ) 6 = ∅ and { y 1 , . . . , y n } is a singleto n. It was pr ov ed in [6] that the following holds for the spaces X n 2 = R n 2 ∪ ∞ [ k = n { n 2 } × V ( G n 2 ,k 2 ) endow ed with the maximal metric which agre e s with the initial metric o n R n 2 and the metric on S ∞ k = n { n 2 } × V ( G n 2 ,k 2 ) inherited fro m Y (note that these tw o metrics co incide o n the int ersec tio n of their domains): ther e is no ( λ, ε )-retra ction of X n 2 to R n 2 with λ < √ n . Now, let f : X → cc P ( X ) b e the map that sends x ∈ X to { δ x } ∈ cc P ( X ). The map f is an isometric embedding and we ar e g oing to show that there is no asy mptotically Lipschitz extension o f f ont o the whole space Y . Ass ume the contrary and let ¯ f : Y → c c P ( X ) b e such an extensio n. W e regar d ¯ f as a map into F ( X ′ ) ⊃ cc P ( X ). Then there exist λ > 0 and ε > 0 such tha t d ( ¯ f ( x ) , ¯ f ( x ′ )) ≤ λd ( x, x ′ ) + ε for a ll x, x ′ ∈ Y . Let n > λ 2 . Since the ma ps cc P ( p n 2 ), b : P ( R n 2 ) → R n 2 and π ar e shor t, we conclude that the ma p x 7→ π ( { b ( µ ) | µ ∈ cc P ( p n 2 )( ¯ f ( x )) } ) : X n 2 → R n 2 is a ( λ, ε )-Lipschitz retra ction from X n 2 onto R n 2 , which c o nt radic ts to the choice of λ . This demonstrates that the space cc P ( X ) is not an AE(0) for the asymptotic ca tegory A . 4. Epilogue W e conjecture that the spaces of capacities (non-additive mea sures; cf. e .g . [13, 14]) are alwa ys absolute extensors in the as ymptotic catego ry A . Note that the scheme o f our pro of of the ma in re s ult of this pap er do es not work for non-additive s itua tion, b ecause o ne do es not have the “ba rycenter map” in this case. Ackno wledgements This research w as supp or ted by the Slov enian Resear ch Agency grants P1-02 92-01 01, J1- 9643- 0101 a nd J1-2 057-0 101. W e tha nk the r eferee for comments and suggestions . HYPERSP A CES OF PROBABILITY MEASURES AND EXTENSORS 5 References [1] L. Bazylevych , D. Rep ov ˇ s, M. Zarichn yi, Sp ac es of idemp otent me asur es of c omp act metric sp ac e s , T op ol. Appl. 157 (2010), 136-144. [2] A. Dranishniko v, Asymptotic top olo gy , Russian Math. Surv. 55 (2000), 71–116. [3] I. Gilb oa, D. Schme idler, Maxmin exp e cte d utility with a non-unique prior , J. M ath. Economics 18 (1989), 141–53. [4] M. Gromov, Asymptotic i nv ariants of infinite gr oups , Geometric Group Theory , V ol. 2 (Sussex, 1991), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. V ol. 182, Cam bridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 1–295. [5] J.E. Hutchinson , F r actals and self-similarity , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (1981), 713–747. [6] U. Lang, Extendability of lar g e-sc ale Lipschitz maps, T rans. Amer. Math. So c. 351 (1999), 3975–3988. [7] G.L. O’Brien, W. V erwaat, How sub additive ar e sub additive c ap acities? , Commen t. Math. Univ. Caroli nae 35:2 (1994), 311–324. [8] J. Roe, Co arse c ohomolo gy and index the ory for c omplete Riemannian manifol ds, Memoirs A mer. Math. Soc. No 497, 1993. [9] E.V. Shchep in, F unctors and unc ountable p owers of c omp acta, (Russian) Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 36:3 (1981), 3–62. [10] M. Zarichn yi, Sp ac e of pr ob ability me asur es and absolute extensors i n the asymptotic c ate gory , F unctional Analysis and Its Applications, Pro c. Int. Conf. Dedicated to the 110th Anniversary of St efan Banac h, Lvi v National Uni versity , Lviv, Ukraine, M a y 28–31, 2002, V. Kadets, Vl adimir et al., Eds., North-Hol l and Math. Studies 197, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004, pp. 311–316 . [11] M. Zaric hnyj, Asymptotic c ate gory and sp ac es of pr ob ability me asur es , Visn. L’viv. Univ. , Ser. Mekh.-Mat. 61(2003) , 211–217. [12] M. Zarichn yi, R e gular line ar op er ators extending metrics: a short pr o of, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. M ath. 44:3 (1996), 267–269. [13] M. M . Zaric hnyi, O. R. Nykyforchin, Cap acity functor in the ca te gory of c omp acta , (Russian) Mat. Sb. 199:2 (2008), 3–26; English transl. : Sb. Math. 199:1-2 (2008), 159–184. [14] Lin Zhou, Inte gr al r epr e sentation of co ntinuous co monotonic al ly additive functionals , T rans. Amer. Math. Soc. 350:5 (1998), 1811–1822 . F acul ty of Ma thema tics and Physics, and F acul ty of Educa tion, University of Ljubljana, P.O.B. 2964, Ljub ljana, 1001 , Slovenia E-mail addr ess : dusan.repo vs@guest.arnes.si Dep ar tment of Mechan ics and Ma thema tics, L viv Na tional Univ ersity, Universytetska 1, 79000 L viv, Ukraine, and Institute of Ma them a tics, Univ ersity of Rzesz ´ ow, Rzesz ´ ow, Poland E-mail addr ess : topos@fran ko.lviv.ua, mzar@litech.lvi v.ua
Original Paper
Loading high-quality paper...
Comments & Academic Discussion
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment