Partially ordered secretaries

Reading time: 6 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Partially ordered secretaries
  • ArXiv ID: 1008.3310
  • Date: 2010-08-19
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

The elements of a finite nonempty partially ordered set are exposed at independent uniform times in $[0,1]$ to a selector who, at any given time, can see the structure of the induced partial order on the exposed elements. The selector's task is to choose online a maximal element. This generalizes the classical linear order secretary problem, for which it is known that the selector can succeed with probability $1/e$ and that this is best possible. We describe a strategy for the general problem that achieves success probability $1/e$ for an arbitrary partial order.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Partially ordered secretaries.

The elements of a finite nonempty partially ordered set are exposed at independent uniform times in $[0,1]$ to a selector who, at any given time, can see the structure of the induced partial order on the exposed elements. The selector’s task is to choose online a maximal element. This generalizes the classical linear order secretary problem, for which it is known that the selector can succeed with probability $1/e$ and that this is best possible. We describe a strategy for the general problem that achieves success probability $1/e$ for an arbitrary partial order.

📄 Full Content

The classical secretary problem asks for a strategy that with reasonable probability picks online the best of n applicants for a job, given that at any time the only information available is the relative ranks of the applicants that have been interviewed so far. For a historical overview of the secretary problem and some of its generalizations, consult [1].

The well-known solution is to reject the first n/e applicants (approximately), and after that to accept the first applicant who is better than all those. The probability of success is asymptotically 1/e for large n, and this is best possible.

It was observed by J. Preater [5] that the selector can achieve success probability bounded away from zero in a partially ordered version of the problem. Here the secretaries are replaced by the elements of a partially ordered set P . These elements are exposed in random order, and at every time the selector can see the order relations between all pairs of exposed elements, in other words the induced partial order on the exposed elements. The task is now to select online one of the maximal elements of P .

The details of the problem can be phrased in a couple of different ways. The selector can be assumed to know in advance the number of elements in P . Alternatively, the selector knows the structure of P , but cannot “recognize” the individual elements as they arrive. In this later case, optimal results are known for some special classes of partial orders. See, for instance, [4] for a strategy that is optimal when P is known to be a binary tree.

In this paper we consider a continuous time version which is at least as hard for the selector as these discrete time versions, and which can easily be shown to be equivalent as far as the best general success probability goes. In this version, the elements of P are exposed at independent uniform times in the interval [0, 1]. We ask for a strategy that achieves success probability at least c > 0 for every finite nonempty partial order P . Obviously such a strategy for the continuous time version can be applied also in discrete time, since knowing the number n of elements in P , we can generate n random “times” in [0, 1] ourselves, and assign them in order to the elements as they arrive.

In [5], Preater described a simple strategy and showed that it succeeds with probability at least 1/8 for every P . The analysis of Preater’s strategy was refined by N. Georgiou, M. Kuchta, M. Morayne and J. Niemiec [2], who showed that with a trivial improvement, it actually succeeds with probability at least 1/4. Later, Kozik [3] suggested another strategy for the general situation, and proved that it has success probability at least a constant c > 1/4 for every sufficiently large n. Kozik’s strategy is indeed a generalization of the strategy in the linear case.

Here, we describe a different strategy that achieves success probability at least 1/e for every P . Since this matches the upper bound given by the analysis of the classical linear order case, it settles the question of the best possible general success probability.

Suppose that the elements of a finite nonempty partial order P are assigned distinct real weights. We define the greedy maximum of P as follows. Let z 0 be the element of smallest weight in P . As long as z i is not maximal, let z i+1 be the element of minimum weight among the elements larger than z i . This gives a chain whose terminal element is the greedy maximum of P .

Our strategy for the partially ordered secretary problem is as follows:

Strategy. We assign independent uniform weights from [0, 1] to the elements as they arrive. After rejecting everything up to time 1/e, we accept the first element x which is itself the greedy maximum of the induced partial order P x on the elements, including x, that have been exposed up to the time when x arrives.

Theorem 1. This strategy succeeds in accepting a maximal element with probability at least 1/e for every partially ordered set.

The rest of the paper is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1. To simplify the discussion, let us say that we tag the element x if it is the greedy maximum of P x . In order for our strategy to accept x, three things are thus required: x must arrive at a time t > 1/e, it must be tagged, and finally no other element must be tagged between time 1/e and time t.

In the following, we think of P as a fixed partially ordered set of n elements.

Lemma 2. Let a 1 , . . . , a n be the elements of P in the order that they are exposed. Let A k be the event that a k is tagged. Then P r(A k ) = 1/k and A 1 , . . . , A n are independent.

Proof. Suppose that we know P and the weights that are eventually assigned to all its elements. Suppose moreover that we know the elements a k+1 , . . . , a n . Then in particular we know which of them are tagged. Now consider the greedy maximum of the induced partial order on {a 1 , . . . , a k }. The probability that this element was the last one to arrive and ther

…(Full text truncated)…

📸 Image Gallery

cover.png page_2.webp page_3.webp

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut