Form factors of descendant operators: Free field construction and reflection relations
The free field representation for form factors in the sinh-Gordon model and the sine-Gordon model in the breather sector is modified to describe the form factors of descendant operators, which are obtained from the exponential ones, $\e^{\i\alpha\phi…
Authors: ** M. Lashkevich, Y. Pugai **
F orm factors of descendan t op erators: F ree field construction and reflection relations Boris F eigin 1 , 2 and Mic hael La shk evic h 1 1 L andau Institute for The or etic al Physics, 142432 Cherno golovka of Mosc ow R e gion, Russia 2 Indep endent University of Mosc ow, 11 Bolshoy Vlasyevsky p er eulok, 11900 2 Mosc ow, Russia De dic a te d to the m emory of A lexey Z amolo dchi kov Abstract The free field represen tation for form factors in the sinh-Gordon model and the sine-Gordon mod el in the breather sector is mo dified to describ e the form factors of descendant op erators, whic h are obtained from th e exp onential ones, e i αϕ , by means of the action of th e Heisenberg algebra associated to the field ϕ ( x ). As a c heck of th e v alidit y of the construction we count the num b ers of op erators defined by the form factors at eac h level in each chiral sector. Another chec k is related to the so called reflection relations, which identif y in the breather sector the descendants of the exp onential fields e i αϕ and e i(2 α 0 − α ) ϕ for generic va lues of α . W e prov e the operators d efi ned by the obtained families of form factors to satisfy such reflection relations. A generalization of the construction for form factors to the kink sector is also prop osed. 1. In tro duction Exact calc ula tion of form facto rs of lo ca l and quasilo ca l op erator s in t wo-dimensional relativistic quantum field theory is known to be reduced to solving a se t of difference e q uation for analytic functions [1–3] called also Ka rowski–W eisz–Smir nov form fa c to r a xioms. One of the techniques for solving these equations is the free field repres ent ation prop osed by Lukyanov [4 ]. It was shown that this r epresentation makes it po ssible to calculate for m factor s o f the exp onential fields e i αϕ in the sine / sinh-Gordo n mo del [5]. But the family of exp onential op er ators is far fro m exhausting the full set of op era tors in the theor y , whic h contains also the descendant op era tors obtained from the exp onential ones by means of the action of the Heisenberg algebr a asso ciated with the field ϕ ( x ). Here we prop ose a construction of the form factors of descendant op erator s in the brea ther sector of the sine-Gor don theory and for the s inh- Gordon theo r y . W e sta rt fro m the proposa l of Babujian a nd Kar owski [6, 7], who express ed the form facto r s o f descendant op erator s in terms of sequences of some auxiliary functions. These sequences must satisfy some conditions to provide form factors of lo ca l oper ators. The main dis tinctio n of our appr oach is that we imp ose muc h mor e r estrictive conditions to these sequences of functions, which makes it p ossible to substantiate the existence of a one-to -one corresp ondence betw een oper ators and sequences of functions. Besides, w e pro po se a n in terpretation of these solutions in terms of an auxiliary commutativ e alge bra and show that at a gener ic v alue of α the dimensions of the level s ubs paces coincide with those for the F o ck mo dules of the Heisenberg algebra . W e go further and, by means of some auxilia ry b osonizatio n pro cedure, prove the existence o f a reflection prop erty , which r elates brea ther for m factor s of desce ndants of the fields e i αϕ and e i(2 α 0 − α ) ϕ (with the v a lue of α 0 known fro m the co nformal field theory ). E a rlier it was conjectured tha t such relations, well known in the Liouville field theory [8], are v alid for the op era tors in the sinh-Gordo n theory [9 , 10]. One may expe ct that they are v alid for the sine- Gordon theory in the sector corr esp onding to the p ertur bed minimal mo del [11, 12]. Surely , this sector includes the brea thers. Notice, that our approach has muc h in commo n with that of [13], though we c oncentrate o ur attention on the br eather sector at generic v alues o f the coupling co ns tants and field pa r ameters. 1 2. Op erator con te nts of the sine/sinh- Gordon mo del Consider the sine-Gor don mo del S SG [ ϕ ] = Z d 2 x ( ∂ µ ϕ ) 2 8 π + µ cos β ϕ . (2.1) W e shall also use the notation β 2 = 2 p p + 1 ≤ 2 , α 0 = 1 β − β 2 = 1 p 2 p ( p + 1) . The spe ctrum of the sine-Gordo n model consists of a kink–a nt ikink (or a soliton–antisoliton) pair of some mass M , which can b e expressed in terms o f to the pa rameter µ [14], and a ser ies of breathers that is no ne mpty for β 2 ≤ 1. The masse s of the brea ther s a re given by the formula m n = 2 M sin π pn 2 , n = 1 , 2 , . . . , pn ≤ 1 . (2.2) Besides, the higher breathers may be cons idered as b ound states of the first breathers of the mass m = m 1 . It mea ns that the form factors w ith r esp ect to the states consisting any n -breathers can b e expressed in terms of the form facto rs with resp ect to the states only containing the 1-breather s . That is why we restrict our considera tion to this 1-brea ther, which will b e just called br eather her e a fter. W e can also consider the sinh-Gor don mo del S ShG [ ϕ ] = Z d 2 x ( ∂ µ ϕ ) 2 8 π + µ ch ˆ β ϕ . (2.3) The spectrum of the model consists of the only kind of par ticles, whic h ca n be considered as a n ‘a nalytic contin ua tio n’ of the 1-br eather in the following sense. The ex pressions for the for m factors of every lo cal o p e r ator with resp ect to thes e particle coincide with those with res p ect to the states consisting of the 1-brea ther s after the s ubs titution β → − i ˆ β . Hence, the s inh-Gordon model corresp onds to the region − 1 < p < 0 . The S ma tr ix o f tw o bre a thers is S ( θ ) = th θ +i π p 2 th θ − i π p 2 . (2.4) Consider the o pe rator conten ts of the mo dels. Let us start with the exp onential op erato rs V ( α ) ( x ) = e i αϕ ( x ) . (2.5) Below it will b e mo re conv enien t to use ano ther para meter a = α − α 0 2 α 0 . (2.6) W e shall alwa ys as sume that the parameters a and α are r elated according to (2.6). Since we wan t to use b oth letter s as subscripts, we shall alwa ys use α there in pa rentheses and a without them, e. g. V ( α ) ( x ) ≡ V a ( x ) . The expo nent ial oper ators do not exhaust the oper ator con tent s of the theory . W e hav e to define the descendant o per ators. First of all, recall that at s mall enough distances the field theories (2.1) and (2.3 ) behave lik e a free b oson theory . T ak e any p oint in the Euclidean pla ne, e. g. x = 0, a nd co nsider the radial q ua ntization picture aro und this p oint. Let z = x 1 − x 0 = x 1 + i x 2 , ¯ z = x 1 + x 0 = x 1 − i x 2 , ∂ = ∂ ∂ z , ¯ ∂ = ∂ ∂ ¯ z . The radial quantization means that we consider ra dia l co or dina tes σ , τ such that z = e τ +i σ 2 and co nsider τ as an imaginary time and σ as a space dimension. There is a one-to - one cor resp ondence betw een states |O i rad in this picture and lo ca l o p erators O ( x ) put to the p oint x = 0. This corresp ondence survives the p e rturbation for nearly all fields except some particula r (‘r esonant’) oper ators. The free field ϕ ( x ) can be e xpanded in this picture a s ϕ ( x ) = Q − i P log z ¯ z + X n 6 =0 a n i n z − n + X n 6 =0 ¯ a n i n ¯ z − n . (2.7) The op erator s Q , P , a n , ¯ a n form a Heisenberg algebra with the only nonzer o commutation rela tions [ P , Q ] = − i , [ a m , a n ] = mδ m + n, 0 , [ ¯ a m , ¯ a n ] = mδ m + n, 0 . (2.8) The states | α i rad defined as a n | α i rad = ¯ a n | α i rad = 0 ( n > 0) , P | α i rad = α | α i rad , | α i rad = e i α Q | 0 i rad (2.9) corres p o nd (up to a constant factor) to the o pe r ators V ( α ) ( x ). The descenda nts form a F o c k mo dule of the algebra (2.8) with the highest vector | α i rad . W e may choose the basis 1 a − k 1 . . . a − k s ¯ a − l 1 . . . ¯ a − l t | α i rad ↔ ( − i) s + t Q ( k i − 1)! Q ( l j − 1)! ∂ k 1 ϕ . . . ∂ k s ϕ ¯ ∂ l 1 ϕ . . . ¯ ∂ l t ϕ e i αϕ (2.10) with 0 < k 1 ≤ . . . ≤ k s , 0 < l 1 ≤ . . . ≤ l t . The pa ir of in teg ers ( n, ¯ n ), where n = P k i , ¯ n = P l i , is called the level of the elemen t. The integers n a nd ¯ n are called chiral and antic hiral level corresp onding ly . The descendants only g enerated by the elements a − k are usually c alled chiral de s cendants, while those only gene r ated by the elements ¯ a − l are c a lled antic hiral o nes. L e t F b e the F o ck submo dule o f chiral descendants. The s ubmo dule of ant ichiral descenda nt s will be referred to as ¯ F . Ev ide ntly , the s ubmo dules F and ¯ F ar e isomorphic. The F o ck module spanned on all the vectors (2.10) is the tensor pro duct F ⊗ ¯ F ≃ F ⊗ F . The mo dule F a dmits a natural g radation into the subspace s F n by the chiral lev el n : F = ∞ M n =0 F n , F n = spa n n a − k 1 . . . a − k s | α i rad s ∈ Z ≥ 0 , s X i =1 k i = n o . The generating function of dimensions of these subspaces (the character) is given by χ ( q ) ≡ ∞ X n =0 q n dim F n = ∞ Y k =1 1 1 − q k . (2.11) 3. F orm factors from free fiel d representat ion 3.1. F orm factors of exp onential op er ators First let us describ e the for m factors of exp onential oper ators. Let | v ac i b e the v a cuum and | θ 1 , . . . , θ N i be the eig e ns tate of the Hamiltonian corr esp onding to N breather s with r apidities θ 1 < . . . < θ N . The form fa ctors of the expo nential can b e written as h θ k +1 , . . . , θ N | V a (0) | θ 1 , . . . , θ k i = G a f a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ k , θ k +1 + i π , . . . , θ N + i π ) . (3.1) Here G a is the v acuum ex pec tation v alue, which is known exactly [15]: G a ≡ h V a (0) i = m α 2 ˇ G a = m Γ 1+ p 2 Γ 2 − p 2 4 √ π α 2 exp Z ∞ 0 dt t sh t 2 sh 2 ( a + 1 2 ) t sh t sh pt 2 sh ( p +1) t 2 − (2 a + 1) 2 2 p ( p + 1) e − ( p +1) t ! . (3.2) 1 The states obta ined b y the action of Q m (corresponding to the op erators con taining ϕ m ) can b e obtained as th e m t h deriv atives in α and th us are obtained trivial ly . 3 Using the free field r epresentation [4 ] the ana ly tic functions f a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) are expres sed in terms of tra ce functions of vertex op erator s [5]. Omitting the deta ils let us write the a nswer in the fo r m f a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) = h h T ( θ N ) . . . T ( θ 1 ) i i a . (3.3) Here T ( θ ) is a genera tor of the degenerate deformed Viraso r o a lgebra [16] and h h . . . i i a is a trace function with the prop erty h h X T ( θ ) i i a = h h T ( θ + 2 π i) X i i a ( ∀ X ) . The generato r T ( θ ) can b e written in the form T ( θ ) = i λ ′ e − i π ˆ a Λ + ( θ ) + e i π ˆ a Λ − ( θ ) (3.4) with the constant factor λ ′ = 1 2 sin π p 2 1 / 2 exp − Z π p 0 dt 2 π t sin t . The element ˆ a is cent ral so that h h F (ˆ a ) i i a = h h F ( a ) i i ( ∀ F ) . (3.5) The pair trace functions of the vertex op erator s Λ ± are given by h h Λ ± ( θ 2 )Λ ± ( θ 1 ) i i = R ( θ 1 − θ 2 ) , h h Λ ± ( θ 2 )Λ ∓ ( θ 1 ) i i = R − 1 ( θ 1 − θ 2 ∓ i π ) = R ( θ 1 − θ 2 ) sh( θ 1 − θ 2 ) ± i sin π p sh( θ 1 − θ 2 ) , R ( θ ) = exp 4 Z ∞ 0 dt t sh π t 2 sh π pt 2 sh π ( p +1) t 2 sh 2 π t ch( π − i θ ) t ! , (3.6) while the g e neral tra ce functions in the r ight hand side of (3.5) factorize into pair trace functions of the vertex op erato r s Λ ε ( θ ): h h Λ ε N ( θ N ) . . . Λ ε 1 ( θ 1 ) i i = Y 1 ≤ i 0) . (5.3) Int ro duce the vertex op era tors λ ± ( z ) = : exp X n 6 =0 d ± n n z − n ! : . (5.4) These vertex op erator s satisfy the rela tions λ ± ( z ′ ) λ ± ( z ) = : λ ± ( z ′ ) λ ± ( z ) : , (5.5a) λ + ( z ′ ) λ − ( z ) = λ − ( z ) λ + ( z ′ ) = f z z ′ : λ + ( z ′ ) λ − ( z ) : . (5.5b) The op erator s λ + ( z ′ ) and λ − ( z ) commute everywhere except the p oints z ′ = ± z . Define a combination t ( z ) = e i π ˆ a λ − ( z ) + e − i π ˆ a λ + ( z ) . (5.6) It lo oks muc h the same as (3.4). Then J N ,a ( X ) = h t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) i a . (5.7) The whole co nstruction lo oks similar to the s ta ndard fr ee field repr esentation [5], but there are s e veral differences. The set of the oscillators here is c o untable ra ther than contin uous a nd the form facto r is prop ortiona l to a v acuum exp ectation ra ther than to a trace. B esides, it s trips off the annoying facto rs R ( θ i − θ j ). These ar e adv antages. T he pr ice we pay for these s implifications is that the residue o f the kinematic pole of the vertex op era tors is a lready not a c -num b er but a new vertex o pe r ator (see (6.1) below). W e shall see that this new v ertex will play an imp ortant role in the pro of of the reflectio n relations. Now in tro duce tw o homomo rphisms of the algebr a A into the Heisenber g alg ebra: π R ( c − n ) = d − n − d + n A + n , π L ( c − n ) = d − − n − d + − n A + n ( n > 0) . (5.8) It is ea sy to chec k that [ π R ( c − n ) , λ ± ( z )] = ( ∓ ) n +1 z n λ ± ( z ) , π R ( c − n ) | 1 i a = 0 , [ π L ( c − n ) , λ ± ( z )] = − ( ± ) n +1 z − n λ ± ( z ) , a h 1 | π L ( c − n ) = 0 . (5.9) Besides, [ π R ( c − m ) , π L ( c − n )] = δ m,n × ( 0 , m ∈ 2 Z + 1 , − 2 m ( A + m ) − 1 , m ∈ 2 Z . (5.10) The maps π R and π L may be considered as a right and a left repres ent ation of the alge br a A . Let a h h | = a h 1 | π R ( h ) , | ¯ h i a = π L ( h ) | 1 i a . (5.11) F rom the equations (5.9) we easily get J h N ,a ( X ) = a h h | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | 1 i a , J ¯ h N ,a ( X ) = a h 1 | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ h i a , h ∈ A . (5.12) Define also functions ˜ J h ¯ h ′ N ,a ( X ) = a h h | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ h ′ i a . (5.13) F or g eneric elements h and h ′ these functions do not coincide with the functions J h ¯ h ′ N ,a ( X ), but they ar e related to them. Let us introduce tw o maps π LR ( h ¯ h ′ ) = π L ( h ′ ) π R ( h ) , π RL ( h ¯ h ′ ) = π R ( h ) π L ( h ′ ) . (5.14) 16 These maps are bijections o f A ⊗ A to the subalgebra of the Heisenber g algebra generated b y the elemen ts d − n − d + n , n 6 = 0 . Then ˜ J h ¯ h ′ N ,a ( X ) = J π − 1 LR ◦ π RL ( h ¯ h ′ ) N ,a ( X ) . (5.15) More explicitly , supp os e that h = Q k µ =1 h µ , h ′ = Q k ′ ν =1 h ′ ν , where h µ , h ′ ν are any linear co mbin ations o f the generator s c − n . Then the rela tion is given by a Wick-t ype formula: ˜ J h ¯ h ′ N ,a ( X ) = min( k,k ′ ) X l =0 k X µ 1 6 = ... 6 = µ l k ′ X ν 1 <...<ν l J h [ µ 1 ...µ l ] h ′ [ ν 1 ...ν l ] N ,a ( X ) l Y s =1 [ π R ( h µ s ) , π L ( h ′ ν s )] , h [ µ 1 ...µ l ] = k Y µ 6 = µ 1 ,...,µ l h µ , h ′ [ ν 1 ...ν l ] = k ′ Y ν 6 = ν 1 ,...,ν l h ′ ν . (5.16) The set o f form factors G a ˜ f g a prop ortiona l to the function ˜ J g N ,a ( X ) corr esp onds to a field ˜ V g a ( x ) = V π − 1 LR ◦ π RL ( g ) a ( x ) . (5.17) Conjecture 2 The op er ators ˜ V g a ( x ) with a homo gene ous element g of the or der ( n, ¯ n ) ar e desc endants of the op er ator V a ( x ) of the definite level ( n, ¯ n ) . Up to now, we are o nly able to substantiate this conjecture in the case of the lev el (2 , 2) descendants. Due to the r esonant p ole on the level (2 , 2) at α = − β / 2 there exists an o p er ator W ( α ) ( x ) at this level such that [10] Res α = − β / 2 W ( α ) ( x ) = V (3 β / 2) ( x ) . Let ˜ V ( A, ¯ B ) a ( x ) = ˜ V h ( A ) a ¯ h ( B ) − a a ( x ) . Consider the op erator ˜ V (2 , ¯ 2) a ( x ) cor resp onding to the function ˜ J g N ,a ( X ) with g = h (2) a ¯ h (2) − a . W e chec k by a dir ect calculation for N ≤ 4 that indeed π sin 2 π p sin 2 π p α 0 Res α = − β / 2 ˜ J h (2) a ¯ h (2) − a N ,a ( X ) dα = J N , (3 β / 2) ( X ) . F or g eneral v a lue s of a the descendant op erator L + − 2 ¯ L + − 2 e i αϕ m ust b e, acco rding to o ur conjecture, a linear combination L + − 2 ¯ L + − 2 e i αϕ = H (2 , ¯ 2) a ˜ V (2 , ¯ 2) a + H (2 , 1 , 1) a ˜ V (2 , 1 , 1) a + H (1 , 1 , ¯ 2) a ˜ V (1 , 1 , ¯ 2) a + H (1 , 1 , 1 , 1) a ˜ V (1 , 1 , 1 , 1) a with some c o efficien ts H ( A, ¯ B ) a . Evidently , the only contribution to the exp ectation comes fro m the first term. The co efficient H a ≡ H (2 , ¯ 2) a should satisfy the equations [10 ] H a = H − a , H a = H − 1 − a ( α − α 12 )( α − α 21 ) ( α + α 12 )( α + α 21 ) 2 . W e hav e to c hoo se a s olution regular at the po ints α = ± α 12 , ± α 21 . O n the other hand, the v acuum exp ectation v alue of the op era tor as s o ciated to ˜ V (2 , ¯ 2) a is eq ua l to G a ˜ f h (2) a ¯ h (2) − a a () = G a ˜ J h (2) a ¯ h (2) − a 0 ,a = G a sin 2 π p (sin 2 π p − sin 2 2 π a ) . The pro duct H a ˜ f h (2) a ¯ h (2) − a a (), prop erly norma lized, c o incides with the function W ( − a/ 2) in [10], which means that Conjecture 2 is consistent with the known exact exp ectation v a lue s found there. 17 6. Pro of of the reflection prop ert y Int ro duce a current s ( z ) = : λ − ( z ) λ + ( − z ) : . (6.1) It is ea sy to chec k that s ( z ) t ( x ) = t ( x ) s ( z ) = f z x : s ( z ) t ( x ) : and h t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x K ) s ( y 1 ) . . . s ( y L ) i a = K Y i =1 L Y j =1 f y j x i L Y j 0 n 1 + ··· + n s = n C n 1 ...n s s Y i =1 ( τ − n i d − n i + τ + n i d + n i ) with s ome no nz e ro co efficients C n 1 ...n s . It means that all p ossible pro ducts of d ± n i ent er the right hand side. F or larg e enough k , l the functions τ ± 1 , . . . , τ ± n are functionally indep endent and they can b e cons ide r ed as indep endent v a riables. Besides, the monomials τ ε 1 n 1 . . . τ ε s n s are linearly indep endent. Hence, for any set of the num b ers A ε 1 ...ε s n 1 ...n s , s = 1 , . . . , n , n 1 , . . . , n s > 0, n 1 + · · · + n s = n , we hav e X s X ε 1 ,...,ε n n 1 ,...,n s A ε 1 ...ε s n 1 ...n s τ ε 1 n 1 . . . τ ε s n s 6 = 0 for so me v a lues o f the v aria bles τ ± 1 , . . . , τ ± n . Therefore, the v ector gener a ted by the n um ber s A ε 1 ...ε s n 1 ...n s is not ortho gonal to some vector generated by pr o ducts of τ ± m . It means that there is no vector in the dim( F ⊗ 2 ) n -dimensional space orthog onal to a ll vectors genera ted by pr o ducts of τ ± m for any v alues o f Ξ, H. It prov es that the vectors of the form ( − ) h n ; Ξ; H | for so me v alues Ξ ( i ) , H ( i ) , i = 1 , . . . , dim( F ⊗ 2 ) n form a ba s is in the level n subspace of the F o ck mo dule. Since for generic v a lues of a the v ertex o pe rators t ( z ) / 2 cos π a a re co nt inuous defor mations of the op erator λ − ( z ), this prov es tha t the vectors a h n ; Ξ; H | also s pa n the level n subspa c e of the right F o c k mo dule for generic v alue s of a . The pro of fo r the le ft F o ck mo dule is just the same. Let a h n ; i | = a h n ; Ξ ( i ) ; H ( i ) | , i = 1 , . . . , dim( F ⊗ 2 ) n be bas ic vectors in the lev el n subspace of the right F o ck module. Let | ¯ n ; j i a be basic vectors in the level ¯ n subspa c e of the left F o ck mo dule. Then we hav e a h n ; i | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ n ; j i a = − a h n ; i | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ n ; j i − a . Now we have to select the vectors ge ner ated by π R ( h ), π L ( h ) for h ∈ A . The vector h v | has the for m a h 1 | π R ( h ) for some h if and o nly if h v | ( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) = 0 , m > 0 . (6.4a) Similarly , the vector | v i has the form π L ( h ) | 1 i a if and only if ( d − m + ( − 1) m d + m ) | v i = 0 , m > 0 . (6.4 b) Let the vectors a h 1 | π R ( h a,n,µ ) = a h g n ; µ | = P i v µ i ( a ) a h n ; i | for m a ba sis in the (dim F n )-dimensional subspace of the level n subspa ce of the F o ck mo dule defined b y the conditions (6.4a). Simila rly define the vectors π L ( h ′ a, ¯ n,ν ) | 1 i a = | g ¯ n ; ν i a = P j ¯ v ν j ( a ) | ¯ n ; j i a . I t is eas y to chec k from the commutation re la tions that h t ( x 1 . . . t ( x K ) s ( y 1 ) . . . s ( y L )( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) t ( x ′ 1 . . . t ( x ′ K ′ ) s ( y ′ 1 ) . . . s ( y ′ L ′ ) i a = h t ( x 1 . . . t ( x K ) s ( y 1 ) . . . s ( y L )( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) t ( x ′ 1 . . . t ( x ′ K ′ ) s ( y ′ 1 ) . . . s ( y ′ L ′ ) i − a . W e hav e 0 = a h g n ; µ | ( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) | n − m ; j i a = X i v µ i ( a ) a h n ; i | ( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) | n − m ; j i a = X i v µ i ( a ) − a h n ; i | ( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) | n − m ; j i − a 19 Therefore, X i v µ i ( a ) − a h n ; i | ( d − − m + ( − 1) m d + − m ) = 0 and ther e exists an element ˜ h − a,n,µ such that X i v µ i ( a ) − a h n ; i | = − a h 1 | π R ( ˜ h − a,n,µ ) . Similarly , there exis ts a n element ˜ h ′ − a, ¯ n,ν such that X j ¯ v ν j ( a ) | ¯ n ; j i − a = π L ( ˜ h ′ − a, ¯ n,µ ) | 1 i − a . Besides, we hav e h π R ( h a,n,µ ) t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) π L ( h ′ a, ¯ n,ν ) i a = a h g n ; µ | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | g ¯ n , ν i a = X i,j v µ i ( a ) ¯ v ν j ( a ) a h n ; i | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ n, j i a = X i,j v µ i ( a ) ¯ v ν j ( a ) − a h n ; i | t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) | ¯ n, j i − a = h π R ( ˜ h − a,n,µ ) t ( x 1 ) . . . t ( x N ) π L ( ˜ h ′ − a, ¯ n,ν ) i − a . Comparing with eq. (4.3) we conclude that r a ( h a,n,µ ) = ˜ h − a,n,µ , r − a ( h ′ a, ¯ n,ν ) = ˜ h ′ − a, ¯ n,ν , which prov es the reflection prop erty . Example: derivation of the se c ond level r efle ction pr op erties Now let us rederive the reflection pr op erties (4.12) a t the level (2 , 0) using the cons tr uction describ ed in this se ction. The adv antage of this deriv a tion is tha t it immedia tely pr ov es the reflection r elations for the level (0 , 2) and (2 , 2) cases . T o get rid of excessive functions f ( z ) r elated to normal o rdering, in tro duce the notation ∗ a h n ; Ξ; H | : a h n ; Ξ; H | = k Y i =1 l Y j =1 f ξ i η j l Y j 0; P 2 2 k = P 2 k , [ P 2 k , P 2 l ] = 0 , P 2 k ( d − − 2 k + d + − 2 k ) = ( d − 2 k + d + 2 k ) P 2 k = 0 . (6.8) These pro jecto rs are a → − a inv ar iant, i. e. inser tion of suc h pro jectors into any (but the s a me) places at bo th sides o f (6.2) do es not break the iden tity . The vector a h n ; Ξ; H | P 2 P 4 . . . automatica lly satisfies the equation (6.4a) with ev en v a lues of m . T his reduce s the num ber of equations to be solv ed. Unfortunately , ‘o dd’ pro jectors cannot be made tw o-sided nor a → − a inv ar iant. 7. The kink sector Now let us prop ose a c onjecture ab out the kink sector. Let V ( θ ) a nd ¯ V ( γ ) b e the vertex op era tors defined a s [5 ] h h V ( θ 2 ) V ( θ 1 ) i i = G ( θ 1 − θ 2 ) , h h V ( θ 2 ) ¯ V ( θ 1 ) i i = h h V ( θ 2 ) ¯ V ( θ 1 ) i i = W ( θ 1 − θ 2 ) ≡ G − 1 ( θ 1 − θ 2 − i π / 2) G − 1 ( θ 1 − θ 2 + i π / 2) , h h ¯ V ( θ 2 ) ¯ V ( θ 1 ) i i = ¯ G ( θ 1 − θ 2 ) ≡ W − 1 ( θ 1 − θ 2 − i π / 2) W − 1 ( θ 1 − θ 2 + i π / 2) (7.1) with G ( θ ) = exp − Z ∞ 0 dt t sh π t 2 sh π ( p +1) t 2 ch( π − i θ ) t sh 2 π t sh π pt 2 ! 3 In the notation used in this section a h 1 | π R ( h (1 , 1) a ) = ∗ a h 2; ; i 1 / 2 , i − 1 / 2 | . 21 = i e C E π sh θ π exp Z ∞ 0 dt t sh π t 2 sh π ( p − 1) t 2 ch ( π − i θ ) t sh 2 π t sh π pt 2 . (7.2) Here C E is the Euler constant. F ormally the integrals diverge at zero , and to ma ke them conv ergent we define them as follows: Z ∞ 0 dt f ( t ) = Z ∞ ǫ dt f ( t ) − 1 ǫ Res t =0 tf ( t ) + log ǫ · Res t =0 f ( t ) ǫ → 0 , if f ( t ) p osses ses a double p ole at zer o. Let V ( θ ) = V ( θ ) e ˆ a +1 / 2 p θ , (7.3) S ( θ ) = Z C ( θ ) dγ 2 π ¯ V ( θ ) e − 2 ˆ a +1 / 2 p γ sh γ − θ − i π/ 2 p . (7.4) As us ual the co ntour C ( θ ) go es along the real axis with a fo ld: it go e s ab ov e θ + i π / 2 and b elow θ − i π/ 2 . Then let Z + ( θ ) = λV ( θ ) , Z − ( θ ) = i λ ¯ λV ( θ ) S ( θ ) . (7.5) Here λ = exp − Z ∞ 0 dt t e − π t sh π t 2 sh π ( p +1) t 2 2 sh 2 π t sh π pt 2 ! ¯ λ = e 2 p +1 p ( C E +log π p ) π p 4 Γ 1 p Γ 1 − 1 p exp − Z ∞ 0 dt t e − 3 π t/ 2 sh π ( p +1) t 2 sh π t sh π pt 2 ! . The for m factor s o f primary op erators are given by G a f a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) ε 1 ...ε N = G a h h Z ( θ N ) . . . Z ( θ 1 ) i i a . (7.6) Now w e define a g eneralizatio n of these form factors. Let ε 1 , . . . , ε N = ± . Let us define the nu mbers { s j } M j =1 = { i | ε i = −} , s 1 < s 2 < . . . < s M , (7.7) Let V i = ( V ( θ i ) , ǫ i = + , V ( θ i ) ¯ V ( γ j ) , ǫ i = − , i = s j . (7.8) Let us s earch the fo r m factors in the form f Q a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) ε 1 ...ε N = (i η ) − M M Y j =1 Z C ( θ s j ) dγ j 2 π 1 sh γ j − θ s j − i π / 2 p h h V N . . . V 1 i i × e α β ( P N i =1 θ i − 2 P M j =1 γ j ) × Q N ,M (e θ 1 , . . . , e θ N | e γ 1 , . . . , e γ M ) . (7.9) F or Q N ,M = 1 this is just the e x plicit form of (7.6 ). The functions Q N ,M ( x 1 , . . . , x N | z 1 , . . . , z M ) are rationa l sub ject to three conditions : 1. They a re symmetric with resp ect to { x i } N i =1 and { z j } M j =1 separately: Q N ,M ( σ X | Z ) = Q N ,M ( X | τ Z ) = Q N ,M ( X | Z ) (7.1 0) for any pe r mut ations σ ∈ S N and τ ∈ S M . 22 2. They s atisfy the chain equation Q N +2 ,M +1 ( X, x, − x | Z, i x ) = Q N ,M ( X | Z ) . (7.11) 3. They a dmit factorizatio n pro p er ty Q N ,M ( X | Z ) = X A Q A N ,M ( X | Z ) ¯ Q A N ,M ( X − 1 | Z − 1 ) with the po lynomials Q A N ,M , ¯ Q A N ,M being o f the form P [ p ] N + M , ( N − M ) / 2 ( X | Z ) fr om (3.1 5). W e do not imp os e any restric tion on the growth of Q N ,M as γ j → ± ∞ . Since G ( θ ) ∼ e − p +1 2 p | θ | as θ → ±∞ , if Q is a p o ly nomial in z i , z − 1 i the integrations in (7.9) are conv ergent for small enough v alues of the pa rameter p . The co njecture is that the in tegrals ca n be defined by an analytic contin uation in p . The bre ather functions P are related to the kink functions Q as P ( X − | X + ) = Q 2 N ,N ( − i ω 1 / 2 X , i ω − 1 / 2 X | ω − 1 / 2 X − , ω 1 / 2 X + ) , X = X − ∪ X + . (7.12) First let the functions Q N ,M be p olynomials. W e conjecture that ph ysically it is e q uiv alent to restriction to the rig ht ( L − k ) c hirality . Let Q n be the spac e of the homogeneo us p olynomials of the order n sub ject to the co nditions 1 –3. Theorem 5 The dimensions of the sp ac es Q n ar e given by the same gener ating fu n ction χ ( q ) . The pro of is quite similar and uses the sa me commutativ e a lgebra. Let K n = 2i 1 − n sin π pn 2 . (7.13) Let us s lightly change the basic elements of the algebr a A : C − m = K − 1 m c − m . (7.14) Let A ( z ) = e P ∞ m =1 C − m z m , D ( z ) = e 2 P ∞ m =1 ( − 1) m − 1 C − 2 m z 2 m . (7.15) Then A ( x ) A ( − x ) D (i x ) = 1 , (7.16) A ( − i ω 1 / 2 x ) A (i ω − 1 / 2 x ) D ( ω ε/ 2 x ) = ( a ( x ) , ε = − 1 , b ( x ) , ε = +1 . (7.17) Define the functions Q h N ,M ( X, Z ) = ( A ( x 1 ) . . . A ( x N ) D ( z 1 ) . . . D ( z M ) , h ) . (7.18) These functions solve the equation (7.11). The pro p er t y (7.1 7) provides the rela tion (7.12 ). The pro o f of linear independence o f the solutions corr esp onding to the element s o f the form (3.20) is similar to that for the functions P h N ,k ( X | Y ). The explicit for m of thes e solutions is Q h N ,M ( X, Z ) = 1 K h ⌈ s/ 2 ⌉ Y m =1 S k 2 m − 1 2 m − 1 ( X ) ⌊ s/ 2 ⌋ Y m =1 ( S 2 m ( X ) + 2( − 1 ) m − 1 S 2 m ( Z )) k 2 m , (7.19) where K h = ⌈ s/ 2 ⌉ Y m =1 K k 2 m − 1 2 m − 1 ⌊ s/ 2 ⌋ Y m =1 K k 2 m 2 m . (7.20) F or the ‘antic hiral’ alg ebra ¯ A we similarly define ¯ A ( z ) = e P ∞ m =1 ¯ C − m z m , ¯ D ( z ) = e 2 P ∞ m =1 ( − 1) m − 1 ¯ C − 2 m z 2 m . (7.21) 23 Now we can write down the fully algebr aic repr esentation in the kink sector. In simila r notation as (3.23) define the bare vertex and the screening op era tor V ( θ ) = A (e θ ) ¯ A (e − θ ) V ( θ )e ˆ a +1 / 2 p θ , (7.22) S ( θ ) = Z C ( θ ) dγ 2 π D (e γ ) ¯ D (e − γ ) ¯ V ( γ ) e − 2 ˆ a +1 / 2 p γ sh γ − θ − i π/ 2 p . (7.23) Let Z + ( θ ) = λ V ( θ ) , Z − ( θ ) = i λ ¯ λ V ( θ ) S ( θ ) . (7.24) Let g ∈ A ⊗ ¯ A . Then the kink form factors of the op erator V g a ( x ) r ead G a f g a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) ε 1 ...ε N = G a ( h hZ ε N ( θ N ) . . . Z ε 1 ( θ 1 ) i i a , g ) . (7.25) The field ˜ V g a is still de fined b y (5 .17). 8. Conclusion The res ults of the present work extend the applicability of the free field representation to desc endant op erator s . The algebra ic receipt presented here seems to admit rather stra ightforw ard generalization to other theories . The auxiliar y free field representation is likely to b e mo re sp e cific, but it is clea r that it also can b e genera lized to, for exa mple, affine T o da theo r ies. Hop efully , the pr o of of the existence of reflection relations can b e also g eneralized to this case. Another w ay to develop the results presented her e is to study truncations of the spaces of op erator s a t ratio nal v alues of p . Thoug h there ar e many imp ortant results on counting descendant op era tors in the restricted s ine- Gordon theory (see e. g . [13, 21, 22]), it is impo rtant to clarify the restr iction pro cedur e fro m the p oint of view o f the free field a pproach. The most impo rtant and ambitious pr oblem that probably can b e addre s sed with the help of these results is to find a wa y to iden tify the form factors a t each level with the pa r ticular descenda nt op erators obtained fro m the exp o nen tial one s by mea ns of the Heisenberg algebra (2.7), (2.8 ) or of the Virasoro algebra. 9. Ac knowledgmen ts W e are gra teful to P . B a seilhac, M. Jimbo, Y a. Puga i, S. Roan, J. Shira ishi, F. Smirnov, and A. Zamolo d- chik ov for interesting and stimulating discus sion. The work w as, in part, supp orted b y the Russian F oundation of Ba sic Res e a rch (the grants 0 8–01– 0072 0, 05–01–0 2934) and by the Pro gram for Suppo rt of Leading Scientific Schoo ls (the grant 34 72.200 8.2). Besides , the visit o f M. L. to LMPT , Universit ´ e de T ours in Octob er 2007 a nd LPTHE, Universit´ e Paris 6 in August– Septem b er 2008 was suppo rted by the ENS–Landau Exchange Prog ram. App endix. Equation of Moti on and Energy-Momentum Conserv ation A.1. Equation of Motion Our aim is to pr ov e that the form factors are consistent with the equa tio n of motion ∂ ¯ ∂ ϕ = π µβ sin β ϕ. (A.1) Though this fact has a lready be e n prov en in [7], it is instructive to re de r ive it fr o m the recurs io n re la - tion (4.25). The deriv atives of a field pr o duce m ultiplication of its for m fa c tors by the compo nents of the momen- tum a ccording to the usual rule P µ ↔ i ∂ µ . These comp onents are given by P z ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) = − m 2 N X i =1 e θ i = − m 2 S 1 ( X ) = − m 2 P c − 1 ( X − | X + ) , P ¯ z ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) = m 2 N X i =1 e − θ i = m 2 S − 1 ( X ) = m 2 P ¯ c − 1 ( X − | X + ) . 24 Since ϕ ( x ) = − i d e i αϕ /dα | α =0 and d h e i αϕ i /dα | α =0 = 0, we hav e h 0 | ∂ ¯ ∂ ϕ (0) | θ 1 , . . . , θ N i = m 2 4i r p ( p + 1 ) 2 N X i =1 e θ i ! N X i =1 e − θ i ! d da f a ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) a = − 1 / 2 . Due to the reflection prop erty (4.2) thes e form facto rs v anish for even v alues o f N . O n the other hand, since [1 5] µ h e i β ϕ i = m 2 1 + p 8 sin π p , (A.2) we hav e π µβ h 0 | sin β ϕ | θ 1 , . . . , θ N i = π 2 sin π p m 2 4i r p ( p + 1 ) 2 ( f p − 1 / 2 ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) − f − p − 1 / 2 ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N )) = ( 0 , N ∈ 2 Z , π sin π p m 2 4i q p ( p +1) 2 f p − 1 / 2 ( θ 1 , . . . , θ N ) , N ∈ 2 Z + 1 . The last equality follows from (4.2), (4.4). Let J ′ N ( x ) = d da J N ,a ( X ) a = − 1 / 2 , R ′ N ,i ( x ) = d da R N ,a,i ( X ) a = − 1 / 2 . (A.3) Then the equation of motion can b e rewritten as S 1 ( X ) S − 1 ( X ) J ′ N ( X ) = π sin π p J N ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) fo r o dd N . (A.4) Let us pro ve this identit y by induction. F o r the function in the right hand side the recursion relation (4.25) takes the fo r m J N ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, x ) = 2 sin π p J N − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) + N − 1 X i =1 x i x + x i R N ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) . (A.5) F or the deriv ativ e in the le ft ha nd side we have J ′ 1 ( x ) = 2 π , J ′ N ( X, x ) = N − 1 X i =1 x i R ′ N ,i ( X ) x + x i ( N = 3 , 5 , . . . ) . (A.6) Rewrite the last line a s S 1 ( X, x ) S − 1 ( X, x ) J ′ 1 ( X, x ) = N − 1 X i =1 x i S − 1 ( ˆ X i ) R ′ N ,i ( X ) + N − 1 X i =1 S 1 ( ˆ X i ) S − 1 ( ˆ X i ) x i R ′ N ,i ( X ) x + x i . (A.7) Here we used the ide ntit y (4.24). Now we wan t to use induction. The equation (A.4) is evidently v alid for N = 1. Now supp ose that it is v alid for some odd v alue of N , which will b e denoted from now on as M − 2. Let us prov e it for N = M . B y the hypo thesis o f the induction we hav e S 1 ( ˆ X i ) S − 1 ( ˆ X i ) R ′ M ,i ( X ) = π sin π p R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) . Hence, the first term in the right hand side of Eq. (A.7) is equal to π sin π p M − 1 X i =1 x i S 1 ( ˆ X i ) R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) = − π sin π p M − 1 X i =1 x i − S 1 ( X ) + x i R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) = π sin π p (2 sin π p J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) − J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X )) , 25 while the second term is, accor ding to the recurr ent r elation, equal to π sin π p M − 1 X i =1 x i x + x i R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) = π sin π p ( J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, x ) − 2 sin π p J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X )) . Collecting b oth terms yields S 1 ( X, x ) S − 1 ( X, x ) J ′ N ( X, x ) = π sin π p ( J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, x ) − J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X ))) . The function J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X )) is x -indepe ndent. Since we can take for x any element of the set { x 1 , . . . , x M } , this function must be constant in all v ariables x 1 , . . . , x M − 1 . F ro m the recurrent equation we hav e const = J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X )) = 2 sin π p J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) + M − 1 X i =1 x i S 1 ( ˆ X i ) R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) . Since the left hand side is a constant, we ma y calculate it in the limit x M − 1 → ∞ . In this limit the o nly nonv anishing term in the sum is that with i = M − 1. W e hav e J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X )) = (2 sin π p ) 2 J M − 2 ,p − 1 / 2 ( ˆ X M − 1 ) − " i sin π p x M − 1 S 1 ( ˆ X M − 1 ) M − 2 Y j =1 f x M − 1 x j − M − 2 Y j =1 f x j x M − 1 ! J M − 2 ,p − 1 / 2 ( ˆ X M − 1 ) # x M − 1 →∞ . Since f ( x ) = 1 + 2i sin π p x as x → ∞ , the second term cance ls the fir s t one and we obtain J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S 1 ( X )) = 0 . (A.8) This prov es (A.4) for N = M and, hence , for any o dd N . A.2. Ener gy-Momentum Conservation L aw The energy- momentu m conser v ation law lo oks like ¯ ∂ T = ∂ Θ , ∂ ¯ T = ¯ ∂ Θ . (A.9) Here T ( z , ¯ z ) = − 2 π T Mink z z ( z , ¯ z ) = − 1 2 ( ∂ ϕ ( z , ¯ z )) 2 , (A.10a ) ¯ T ( z , ¯ z ) = − 2 π T Mink ¯ z ¯ z ( z , ¯ z ) = − 1 2 ( ¯ ∂ ϕ ( z , ¯ z )) 2 , (A.10b) Θ( z , ¯ z ) = 2 π T Mink z ¯ z ( z , ¯ z ) = π µ 1 + p cos β ϕ ( z , ¯ z ) . (A.10 c) The denomina tor 1 + p in the second line is the well-kno wn quantum corre c tio n to the p otential part of the energy-mo men tum tensor in the sine-Go rdon mo del. The compo nent Θ( x ) is a combination o f expo ne ntial fields, but the comp onent T ( x ) is a de s cendant and has to b e identified. The last must be a linear combination of the op er ators V c − 2 − 1 / 2 ( x ) and V c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ). Let us pr ov e that T ( x ) = i π m 2 sin π p 8 V h (2) a a ( x ) a →− 1 / 2 , (A.11) ¯ T ( x ) = i π m 2 sin π p 8 V ¯ h (2) − a a ( x ) a →− 1 / 2 , (A.12) 26 The J functions co rresp onding to V h (2) a a ( x ) a r e g iven b y J h (2) a N ,a ( X ) ≃ 1 sin π p J c − 2 N ,a ( X ) + i π ( a + 1 / 2) S 2 1 ( X ) J N ,a ( X ) as a → − 1 / 2. The second term turns o ut to b e finite in this limit since J N ,a ( x ) → 0 for N > 0 a nd S 1 ( X ) = 0 for N = 0. Hence, J h (2) a N ,a ( X ) a →− 1 / 2 = 1 sin π p J c − 2 N , − 1 / 2 ( X ) + i π S 2 1 ( X ) J ′ N ( X ) . (A.13) If (A.11) is true, due to (A.10c) a nd (A.2) the firs t of the equa tions (A.9) takes the form J h (2) a ¯ c − 1 N ,a ( X ) a →− 1 / 2 = i 2 sin 2 π p J c − 1 N , − 1 / 2+ p ( X ) + J c − 1 N , − 1 / 2 − p ( X ) . (A.14) W e wan t to prov e this identit y . First, notice that b oth the left and the right hand side o f (A.14) are zero for o dd N . Indeed, this is an immediate consequence of the reflection pro pe r ty together with the per io dicity (4.4). Hence, we have to prove the identit y for even N : J h (2) a ¯ c − 1 N ,a ( X ) a →− 1 / 2 = i sin 2 π p J c − 1 N , − 1 / 2+ p ( X ) , N ∈ 2 Z . This identit y is e vidently true for N = 0. Suppose that it is true for N ≤ M − 2 for so me v alue M . According to the recurre nt relation (4.18) for h (2) a with J (0) from (4.30) we hav e J h (2) a ¯ c − 1 M ,a ( X, x ) a →− 1 / 2 = − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i x − 1 + x − 1 i R h (2) a ¯ c − 1 M ,a,i ( X ) a →− 1 / 2 − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i R h (2) a M ,a,i ( X ) a →− 1 / 2 + 2i x π ( x − 1 + S − 1 ( X )) S 1 ( X ) J ′ M − 1 ( X ) . Applying the induction hypothesis to R ′ M − 2 ,i and the eq uation (A.4) to J ′ M − 1 we obtain J h (2) a ¯ c − 1 M ,a ( X, x ) a →− 1 / 2 = i sin 2 π p − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i R c − 1 M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) x − 1 + x − 1 i − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i S 1 ( X ) − x i S − 1 ( X ) − x − 1 i R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) ! + 2i x sin π p x − 1 + S − 1 ( X ) S − 1 ( X ) J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) . On the o ther ha nd, from the recurre nt relation (4.25) and the identit y (4.24) we get J c − 1 M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, x ) = − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i R c − 1 M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) x − 1 + x − 1 i + 2 sin π p ( x + S 1 ( X )) J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) . Combining the last t wo equations we obtain J h (2) a ¯ c − 1 M ,a ( X, x ) a →− 1 / 2 − i sin 2 π p J c − 1 M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, x ) = i sin 2 π p − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i S 1 ( X ) − x i S − 1 ( X ) − x − 1 i R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) + 2 sin π p S − 1 − 1 ( X ) − S 1 ( X ) J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) ! = i S − 1 − 1 ( X ) − S 1 ( X ) sin 2 π p − M − 1 X i =1 x − 1 i R M ,p − 1 / 2 ,i ( X ) − S − 1 ( X ) + x − 1 i + 2 sin π p J M − 1 ,p − 1 / 2 ( X ) ! = i S 1 ( X ) − S − 1 − 1 ( X ) sin 2 π p J M ,p − 1 / 2 ( X, − S − 1 − 1 ( X )) = 0 . 27 The last equality is der ived in the same way as (A.8). This proves (A.14) and, therefore , (A.11 ). The pro of of (A.12) is just the same. W e ought to make one more remar k on the energy -momentum cons erv ation law. Le t us introduce t wo mo dified energy- momentum tens ors T ± µν corres p o nding to the currents T ± ( z , ¯ z ) = − 1 2 ( ∂ ϕ ( z , ¯ z )) 2 ± i α 0 ∂ 2 ϕ ( x ) , (A.15a) ¯ T ± ( z , ¯ z ) = − 1 2 ( ¯ ∂ ϕ ( z , ¯ z )) 2 ± i α 0 ¯ ∂ 2 ϕ ( x ) , (A.15b) Θ ± ( z , ¯ z ) = π µ 1 + p e ± i β ϕ ( z , ¯ z ) . (A.15c) Due to the equation of motion they also satisfy the conser v ation laws ¯ ∂ T ± = ∂ Θ ± , ∂ ¯ T ± = ¯ ∂ Θ ± . (A.16) These mo dified energy-momentum tensor s a r e relev a nt to tw o kinds of q ua nt um reduction in the sine- Gordon mo del. In the co nformal limit the comp onents T ± , ¯ T ± generate the Virasoro algebr as with the central charge c = 1 − 6 /p ( p + 1) < 1. Now, it is ea s y to chec k tha t T + ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V (2) − 1 / 2 ( x ) sin π p + i π V ′ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V c − 2 − 1 / 2 ( x ) + 2i π V ′ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) , ¯ T + ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V ( ¯ 2) − 1 / 2 ( x ) sin π p + i π V ′ ¯ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V ¯ c − 2 − 1 / 2 ( x ) . (A.17) T − ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V (2) − 1 / 2 ( x ) sin π p − i π V ′ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V c − 2 − 1 / 2 ( x ) , ¯ T − ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V ( ¯ 2) − 1 / 2 ( x ) sin π p − i π V ′ ¯ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) = i π m 2 8 V ¯ c − 2 − 1 / 2 ( x ) − 2i π V ′ ¯ c 2 − 1 − 1 / 2 ( x ) , (A.18) where V (2) − 1 / 2 = V h (2) a a a →− 1 2 , V ( ¯ 2) − 1 / 2 = V ¯ h (2) − a a a →− 1 2 , V ′ g a ( x ) = d da ′ V g a ′ a ′ → a . References [1] M. Karowski and P . W eis z, Nucl. Phys. B139 (19 78) 455. [2] F. A. Smirnov, J. Phys. A17 (1984) L 8 73. [3] F. A. Smirnov, F orm factors in c ompletely inte gr able mo dels of quantu m field the ory , W or ld Scient ific, Singap or e (1992 ) [4] S. L. Lukyanov, Commun. Math. Phys. 16 7 (1995 ) 18 3 [ar Xiv:h ep-th/ 9307196] . [5] S. L. Lukyanov, Mo d. Phys. L ett. A12 (1997 ) 254 3 [arXi v:hep -th/97 03190] . [6] H. M. Babujian and M. Kar owski, Phy s. L ett. B471 (199 9) 53 [ar Xiv:h ep-th /9909153] . [7] H. Babujian and M. Kar owski, J. Phys. A35 (2002 ) 9081 [arXi v:hep -th/0204 097] . [8] A. B. Zamolo dchiko v and Al. B. Zamo lo dchik ov, Nucl. Phys. B477 (199 6) 5 77 [arXiv :hep- th/95 06136] . [9] V. F ateev, S. L. Lukyanov, A. B. Zamolo dc hik ov and Al. B. Zamolo dc hik ov, Phys. L ett. B406 (1997) 8 3 [arXiv :hep- th/9702190] . [10] V. F ateev, D. F r adkin, S. L. Lukyanov, A. B. Z amolo dchik ov a nd Al. B. Za molo dchik ov, Nu cl. Phys. B540 (1999) 5 87 [arX iv:hep -th/9807236] . 28 [11] F. A. Smir nov, Int. J . Mo d. Phys. A4 (1989) 4 213. [12] F. A. Smir nov, Nucl. Phys. B337 (1990) 1 56. [13] O. Ba be lo n, D. Bernar d and F. A. Smirnov, Commun. Math. Phys. 1 86 (1 997) 6 01 [arXiv :hep- th/96 06068] . [14] Al. B. Zamolo dchik ov, In t. J. Mo d. Phys. A10 (1995) 1 125. [15] S. L . Lukyano v and A. B. Za molo dchik ov, Nu cl. Phys. B49 3 (19 97) 57 1 [arXiv :hep- th/96 11238] . [16] S. L . Lukyano v, Phys. L ett . B367 (199 6) 121 [arX iv:hep -th/9 509037] . [17] See Wolfr amMathworld by E. W eiss tein, http:/ /math world .wolfram.com/Newton-GirardFormulas.html . [18] G. Delfino and G. Nicco li, J. St at. Me ch. 0504 (2005 ) P004 [arX iv:hep -th/0501173] . [19] A. K oub ek a nd G. Mussardo , Phys. L ett . B311 (199 3) 193 [arX iv:hep -th/9 306044] . [20] V. A. F ateev, V. V. Postniko v and Y. P . Pug ai, JETP L ett. 83 (2006 ) 172 [arXiv :hep- th/06 01073] . [21] M. J imbo, T. Miw a and Y. T akey ama, ar Xiv:ma th-ph /0303059 . [22] G. Delfino and G. Nicco li, Nucl. Phys. B799 (20 08) 364 [ arXiv :0712. 2165 [hep-t h]] . 29
Original Paper
Loading high-quality paper...
Comments & Academic Discussion
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment