In this article we further the study of non-commutative motives. Our main result is the construction of a simple model, given in terms of infinite matrices, for the suspension in the triangulated category of non-commutative motives. As a consequence, this simple model holds in all the classical invariants such as Hochschild homology, cyclic homology and its variants (periodic, negative, ...), algebraic K-theory, topological Hochschild homology, topological cyclic homology, ...
Deep Dive into Universal suspension via Non-commutative motives.
In this article we further the study of non-commutative motives. Our main result is the construction of a simple model, given in terms of infinite matrices, for the suspension in the triangulated category of non-commutative motives. As a consequence, this simple model holds in all the classical invariants such as Hochschild homology, cyclic homology and its variants (periodic, negative, …), algebraic K-theory, topological Hochschild homology, topological cyclic homology, …
arXiv:1003.4425v1 [math.KT] 23 Mar 2010
UNIVERSAL SUSPENSION
VIA NON-COMMUTATIVE MOTIVES
GONC¸ALO TABUADA
Abstract. In this article we further the study of non-commutative motives,
initiated in [5, 6, 26]. Our main result is the construction of a simple model,
given in terms of infinite matrices, for the suspension in the triangulated cate-
gory of non-commutative motives. As a consequence, this simple model holds
in all the classical invariants such as Hochschild homology, cyclic homology and
its variants (periodic, negative, . . .), algebraic K-theory, topological Hochschild
homology, topological cyclic homology, . . .
1. Introduction
Non-commutative motives. A differential graded (=dg) category, over a commu-
tative base ring k, is a category enriched over complexes of k-modules (morphisms
sets are such complexes) in such a way that composition fulfills the Leibniz rule :
d(f ◦g) = (df)◦g+(−1)deg(f)f ◦(dg). Dg categories enhance and solve many of the
technical problems inherent to triangulated categories; see Keller’s ICM adress [13].
In non-commutative algebraic geometry in the sense of Bondal, Drinfeld, Kaledin,
Kapranov, Kontsevich, To¨en, Van den Bergh, . . . [2, 3, 7, 10, 17, 18, 31], they are
considered as dg-enhancements of derived categories of (quasi-)coherent sheaves on
a hypothetic non-commutative space.
All the classical (functorial) invariants, such as Hochschild homology HH, cyclic
homology HC, (non-connective) algebraic K-theory IK, topological Hochschild
homology T HH, and topological cyclic homology T C, extend naturally from k-
algebras to dg categories. In order to study all these classical invariants simultane-
ously the author introduced in [26] the notion of localizing invariant. This notion,
that we now recall, makes use of the language of Grothendieck derivators [9], a
formalism which allows us to state and prove precise universal properties.
Let
L : HO(dgcat) →D be a morphism of derivators, from the derivator associated
to the derived Morita model structure on dg categories (see §2.2), to a triangu-
lated derivator. We say that L is a localizing invariant if it preserves filtered ho-
motopy colimits as well as the terminal object, and sends exact sequences of dg
categories (see §2.3)
A −→B −→C
7→
L(A) −→L(B) −→L(C) −→L(A)[1]
Date: August 28, 2018.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 18D20, 19D35, 19D55.
Key words and phrases. Non-commutative motives, Infinite matrix algebras, Algebraic K-
theory, (Topological) Hochschild and cyclic homology.
The author was partially supported by the Estimulo `a Investiga¸c˜ao Award 2008 - Calouste
Gulbenkian Foundation.
1
2
GONC¸ALO TABUADA
to distinguished triangles in the base category D(e) of D. Thanks to the work of
Keller [14, 15], Thomason-Trobaugh [30], Schlichting [22], and Blumberg-Mandell [1]
(see also [29]), all the mentioned invariants satisfy localization1, and so give rise
to localizing invariants.
In [26], the author constructed the universal localizing
invariant
Uloc
dg : HO(dgcat) −→Motloc
dg ,
i.e. given any triangulated derivator D, we have an induced equivalence of categories
(1.1)
(Uloc
dg )∗: Hom!(Motloc
dg , D)
∼
−→Homloc(HO(dgcat), D) ,
where the left-hand side denotes the category of homotopy colimit preserving mor-
phisms of derivators, and the right-hand side denotes the category of localizing
invariants. Because of this universality property, which is a reminiscence of mo-
tives, Motloc
dg is called the localizing motivator, and its base category Motloc
dg (e) the
category of non-commutative motives. We invite the reader to consult [5, 6, 26] for
several applications of this theory of non-commutative motives.
Universal suspension. The purpose of this article is to construct a simple model
for the suspension in the triangulated category of non-commutative motives.
Consider the k-algebra Γ of N × N-matrices A which satisfy the following two
conditions : (1) the set {Ai,j | i, j ∈N} is finite; (2) there exists a natural number
nA such that each row and each column has at most nA non-zero entries; see
Definition 3.5. Let Σ be the quotient of Γ by the two-sided ideal consisting of those
matrices with finitely many non-zero entries; see Definition 3.1. Alternatively, take
the (left) localization of Γ with respect to the matrices In, n ≥0, with entries
(In)i,j = 1 for i = j > n and 0 otherwise; see Proposition 3.11. The algebra Σ goes
back to the work of Karoubi and Villamayor [12] on negative K-theory. Recently,
it was used by Corti˜nas and Thom [4] in the construction of a bivariant algebraic
K-theory. Given a dg category A, we denote by Σ(A) the tensor product of A with
Σ; see §2.1. The main result of this article is the following.
Theorem 1.2. For every dg category A we have a canonical isomorphism
Uloc
dg (Σ(A))
∼
−→Uloc
dg (A)[1] .
The proof of Theorem 1.2 is based on several properties of the category of non-
commutative motives (see Section 6), on an exact sequence relating A and Σ(A)
(see Section 4), and on the flasquene
…(Full text truncated)…
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.