Relations between users on social media sites often reflect a mixture of positive (friendly) and negative (antagonistic) interactions. In contrast to the bulk of research on social networks that has focused almost exclusively on positive interpretations of links between people, we study how the interplay between positive and negative relationships affects the structure of on-line social networks. We connect our analyses to theories of signed networks from social psychology. We find that the classical theory of structural balance tends to capture certain common patterns of interaction, but that it is also at odds with some of the fundamental phenomena we observe --- particularly related to the evolving, directed nature of these on-line networks. We then develop an alternate theory of status that better explains the observed edge signs and provides insights into the underlying social mechanisms. Our work provides one of the first large-scale evaluations of theories of signed networks using on-line datasets, as well as providing a perspective for reasoning about social media sites.
Deep Dive into Signed Networks in Social Media.
Relations between users on social media sites often reflect a mixture of positive (friendly) and negative (antagonistic) interactions. In contrast to the bulk of research on social networks that has focused almost exclusively on positive interpretations of links between people, we study how the interplay between positive and negative relationships affects the structure of on-line social networks. We connect our analyses to theories of signed networks from social psychology. We find that the classical theory of structural balance tends to capture certain common patterns of interaction, but that it is also at odds with some of the fundamental phenomena we observe — particularly related to the evolving, directed nature of these on-line networks. We then develop an alternate theory of status that better explains the observed edge signs and provides insights into the underlying social mechanisms. Our work provides one of the first large-scale evaluations of theories of signed networks usi
arXiv:1003.2424v1 [physics.soc-ph] 11 Mar 2010
Signed Networks in Social Media
Jure Leskovec
Stanford University
jure@cs.stanford.edu
Daniel Huttenlocher
Cornell University
dph@cs.cornell.edu
Jon Kleinberg
Cornell University
kleinber@cs.cornell.edu
ABSTRACT
Relations between users on social media sites often reflect
a mixture of positive (friendly) and negative (antagonistic)
interactions. In contrast to the bulk of research on social net-
works that has focused almost exclusively on positive inter-
pretations of links between people, we study how the inter-
play between positive and negative relationships affects the
structure of on-line social networks. We connect our anal-
yses to theories of signed networks from social psychology.
We find that the classical theory of structural balance tends
to capture certain common patterns of interaction, but that it
is also at odds with some of the fundamental phenomena we
observe — particularly related to the evolving, directed na-
ture of these on-line networks. We then develop an alternate
theory of status that better explains the observed edge signs
and provides insights into the underlying social mechanisms.
Our work provides one of the first large-scale evaluations of
theories of signed networks using on-line datasets, as well
as providing a perspective for reasoning about social media
sites.
Author Keywords
signed networks, structural balance, status theory, positive
edges, negative edges, trust, distrust.
ACM Classification Keywords
H.5.3 Information Systems: Group and Organization Inter-
faces—Web-based interaction.
General Terms
Human Factors, Measurement, Design.
INTRODUCTION
Social network analysis provides a useful perspective on a
range of social computing applications. The structure of net-
works arising in such applications offers insights into pat-
terns of interactions, and reveals global phenomena at scales
that may be hard to identify when looking at a finer-grained
resolution. At the same time, there is an ongoing challenge
in adapting such network approaches to the study of social
computing: users develop rich relationships with one an-
other in these settings, while network analyses generally re-
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for
personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are
not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies
bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or
republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific
permission and/or a fee.
CHI 2010, April 10 – 15, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Copyright 2010 ACM 978-1-60558-929-9/10/04...$10.00.
duce these complex relationship to the existence of simple
pairwise links. It is a fundamental research problem to bridge
the gap between the richness of the existing relationships and
the stylized nature of network representations of these rela-
tionships.
The main focus of our work here is to examine the inter-
play between positive and negative links in social media —
a dimension of on-line social network analysis that has been
largely unexplored. With relatively few exceptions (e.g., [1,
15, 16]), research in on-line social networks has focused on
contexts in which the interactions have largely only positive
interpretations — that is, connecting people to their friends,
fans, followers, and collaborators. But in many settings it is
important to also explicitly take negative relations into con-
sideration, especially when studying interactions in social
media: discussion lists are filled with controversy and dis-
agreement, and social-networking sites harbor antagonism
alongside amity. The richness of a social network in such
cases generally consists of a mixture of both positive and
negative interactions, co-existing in a single structure.
We aim to develop a better understanding of the role that net-
work structure plays when some links between people are
positive while others are negative. For instance, in on-line
rating sites such as Epinions, people can give both positive
and negative ratings not only to items but also to other raters.
In on-line discussion sites such as Slashdot, users can tag
other users as “friends” and “foes”. Our approach here is
to adapt and extend theories from social psychology to an-
alyze these types of signed networks as they arise in social
computing applications. These theories enable us to char-
acterize the differences between the observed and predicted
configurations of positive and negative links in on-line so-
cial networks. We also use contrasts between the theories to
draw inferences about how links are being used in particular
social computing applications. In addition to insights into
the applications themselves, our studies provide, to the best
of our knowledge, some of the first large-scale evaluations
of these social-psychological theories via on-line datasets.
Positive and negative links in on-line data
…(Full text truncated)…
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.