📝 Original Info
- Title: Mainly axion cold dark matter in the minimal supergravity model
- ArXiv ID: 0906.2595
- Date: 2009-09-28
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
We examine the minimal supergravity (mSUGRA) model under the assumption that the strong CP problem is solved by the Peccei-Quinn mechanism. In this case, the relic dark matter (DM) abundance consists of three components: {\it i}). cold axions, {\it ii}). warm axinos from neutralino decay, and {\it iii}). cold or warm thermally produced axinos. To sustain a high enough re-heat temperature (T_R\agt 10^6 GeV) for many baryogenesis mechanisms to function, we find that the bulk of DM should consist of cold axions, while the admixture of cold and warm axinos should be rather slight, with a very light axino of mass \sim 100 keV. For mSUGRA with mainly axion cold DM (CDM), the most DM-preferred parameter space regions are precisely those which are least preferred in the case of neutralino DM. Thus, rather different SUSY signatures are expected at the LHC in the case of mSUGRA with mainly axion CDM, as compared to mSUGRA with neutralino CDM.
💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Mainly axion cold dark matter in the minimal supergravity model.
We examine the minimal supergravity (mSUGRA) model under the assumption that the strong CP problem is solved by the Peccei-Quinn mechanism. In this case, the relic dark matter (DM) abundance consists of three components: {\it i}). cold axions, {\it ii}). warm axinos from neutralino decay, and {\it iii}). cold or warm thermally produced axinos. To sustain a high enough re-heat temperature (T_R\agt 10^6 GeV) for many baryogenesis mechanisms to function, we find that the bulk of DM should consist of cold axions, while the admixture of cold and warm axinos should be rather slight, with a very light axino of mass \sim 100 keV. For mSUGRA with mainly axion cold DM (CDM), the most DM-preferred parameter space regions are precisely those which are least preferred in the case of neutralino DM. Thus, rather different SUSY signatures are expected at the LHC in the case of mSUGRA with mainly axion CDM, as compared to mSUGRA with neutralino CDM.
📄 Full Content
arXiv:0906.2595v2 [hep-ph] 12 Aug 2009
Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION
Mainly axion cold dark matter
in the minimal supergravity model
Howard Baera, Andrew D. Boxa and Heaya Summya
aDept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
E-mail: baer@nhn.ou.edu, box@nhn.ou.edu,heaya@nhn.ou.edu
Abstract: We examine the minimal supergravity (mSUGRA) model under the assump-
tion that the strong CP problem is solved by the Peccei-Quinn mechanism. In this case,
the relic dark matter (DM) abundance consists of three components: i). cold axions, ii).
warm axinos from neutralino decay, and iii). cold or warm thermally produced axinos. To
sustain a high enough re-heat temperature (TR
>∼106 GeV) for many baryogenesis mech-
anisms to function, we find that the bulk of DM should consist of cold axions, while the
admixture of cold and warm axinos should be rather slight, with a very light axino of mass
∼100 keV. For mSUGRA with mainly axion cold DM (CDM), the most DM-preferred
parameter space regions are precisely those which are least preferred in the case of neu-
tralino DM. Thus, rather different SUSY signatures are expected at the LHC in the case
of mSUGRA with mainly axion CDM, as compared to mSUGRA with neutralino CDM.
Keywords: Supersymmetry Phenomenology, Supersymmetric Standard Model, Dark
Matter.
1. Introduction
The cosmic abundance of cold dark matter (CDM) has been recently measured to high
precision by the WMAP collaboration[1], which lately finds
ΩCDMh2 = 0.110 ± 0.006,
(1.1)
where Ω= ρ/ρc is the dark matter density relative to the closure density, and h is the scaled
Hubble constant. No particle present in the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics has
exactly the right properties to constitute CDM. However, CDM does emerge naturally from
two compelling solutions to longstanding problems in particle physics.
The first problem is the strong CP problem[2], for which an elegant solution was
proposed by Peccei and Quinn many years ago[3], and which naturally predicts the existence
of a new particle[4]: the axion a. The axion turns out to be an excellent candidate particle
for CDM in the universe[5].
The second problem– the gauge hierarchy problem– arises due to quadratic divergences
in the scalar sector of the SM. The quadratic divergences lead to scalar masses blowing
up to the highest scale in the theory (e.g. in grand unified theories (GUTS), the GUT
scale MGUT ≃2 × 1016 GeV), unless exquisite fine-tuning of parameters is invoked. The
gauge hierarchy problem is naturally solved by introducing supersymmetry (SUSY) into
the theory. By including softly broken SUSY, quadratic divergences cancel between fermion
and boson loops, and only log divergences remain. The log divergence is soft enough that
vastly different scales remain stable within a single effective theory. In SUSY theories, the
lightest neutralino emerges as an excellent WIMP CDM candidate. The gravitino of SUSY
theories is also a good super-WIMP CDM candidate[6]. Gravity-mediated SUSY breaking
models include gravitinos with weak-scale masses. These models experience tension due
to possible overproduction of gravitinos in the early universe. In addition, late decaying
gravitinos may disrupt calculations of light element abundances produced by Big Bang
nucleosynthesis (BBN). This tension is known as the gravitino problem.
Of course, it is highly desirable to simultaneously account for both the strong CP
problem and the gauge hierarchy problem. In this case, it is useful to invoke supersymmetric
models which include the PQ solution to the strong CP problem[7]. In a SUSY context,
the axion field is just one element of an axion supermultiplet. The axion supermultiplet
contains a complex scalar field, whose real part is the R-parity even saxion field s(x), and
whose imaginary part is the axion field a(x). The supermultiplet also contains an R-parity
odd spin-1
2 Majorana field, the axino ˜a[8]. The saxion, while being an R-parity even field,
nonethless receives a SUSY breaking mass likely of order the weak scale. The axion mass is
constrained by cosmology and astrophysics to lie in a favored range 10−2 eV> ma > 10−5
eV. The axino mass is very model dependent[9], and is expected to lie in the general range
of keV to GeV. An axino in this mass range would likely serve as the lightest SUSY particle
(LSP), and is also a good candidate particle for cold dark matter[10].
In this paper, we investigate supersymmetric models wherein the PQ solution to the
strong CP problem is also invoked. For definiteness, we will restrict ourselves to examining
the paradigm minimal supergravity (mSUGRA or CMSSM) model[11]. We will restrict our
– 1 –
work to cases where the lightest neutralino ˜χ0
1 is the next-to-lightest SUSY particle (NLSP);
the case with a stau NLSP has recently been examined in Ref. [12]. Related previous work
on axino DM in mSUGRA can be found in Ref. [14].
We will be guided in our analysis also by considering the possibility of i
…(Full text truncated)…
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.