For a class of integral operators with kernels metric functions on manifold we find some necessary and sufficient conditions to have finite rank. The problem we pose has a stochastic nature and boils down to the following alternative question. For a random sample of discrete points, what will be the probability the symmetric matrix of pairwise distances to have full rank? When the metric is an analytic function, the question finds full and satisfactory answer. As an important application, we consider a class of tensor systems of equations formulating the problem of recovering a manifold distribution from its covariance field and solve this problem for representing manifolds such as Euclidean space and unit sphere.
Deep Dive into On the Stochastic Rank of Metric Functions.
For a class of integral operators with kernels metric functions on manifold we find some necessary and sufficient conditions to have finite rank. The problem we pose has a stochastic nature and boils down to the following alternative question. For a random sample of discrete points, what will be the probability the symmetric matrix of pairwise distances to have full rank? When the metric is an analytic function, the question finds full and satisfactory answer. As an important application, we consider a class of tensor systems of equations formulating the problem of recovering a manifold distribution from its covariance field and solve this problem for representing manifolds such as Euclidean space and unit sphere.
arXiv:0810.5549v3 [math.MG] 24 Apr 2009
On the Stochastic Rank of Metric Functions
Nikolay Balov
May 31, 2018
Abstract
For a class of integral operators with kernels metric functions on
manifold we find some necessary and sufficient conditions to have fi-
nite rank. The problem we pose has a stochastic nature and boils
down to the following alternative question. For a random sample of
discrete points, what will be the probability the symmetric matrix of
pairwise distances to have full rank? When the metric is an analytic
function, the question finds full and satisfactory answer. As an im-
portant application, we consider a class of tensor systems of equations
formulating the problem of recovering a manifold distribution from its
covariance field and solve this problem for representing manifolds such
as Euclidean space and unit sphere.
1
Problem formulation and motivation
We start with the classical Fredholm integral equation of the first kind
Z
V
ψ(x, y)f(y)dy = g(x), x ∈U,
(1)
where U and V are open sets in Rn and f : U →R, g : V →R, and ψ :
U × V →R are some functions. Depending on the domains more conditions
on f, g and ψ may be necessary for the correct formulation of (1).
Let
{xi}k
i=1 and {yi}k
i=1 be two discrete samples of points chosen by uniform
distributions on U and V respectively. Then equation (1) can be discretized
by the matrix-quadrature method
k
X
j=1
ψ(xi, yj)f(yj) = g(xi), i = 1, ..., k.
(2)
1
In general, the inverse problem of solving (1) for f, is often ill-posed and
approximation based on (2) will eventually result in increasingly unstable
solution as k increases. Here, however, we are interested in the first potential
obstacle to solve (2) - the matrix Ψ := {ψ(xi, yj)}k,k
i,j=1,1 may not be of full
rank. The problem is stochastic one for the points xi’s and yj’s are chosen in
random fashion. In section 2 we investigated it and find some conditions for
the kernel ψ, which guarantee that for any k, Ψ has full rank with probability
one.
We also show some necessary and sufficient conditions for analytic
kernels ψ to be of finite rank.
A further generalization of equation (1) takes f to be a function on n-
manifold M and g and ψ to be linear operator fields on M. For a point p ∈M
with Mp we denote the tangent space at p and with T 1
1 (Mp), the vector space
of (1,1)-tensors (linear operators) on Mp. Let µ be a measure on M as for
example the volume measure V (p) on Riemannian manifolds. Consider the
equation
Z
M
Y (p, q)f(q)dµ(q) = C(p), p ∈M,
(3)
such that Y (p, .) ∈T 1
1 (Mp) and C(p) ∈T 1
1 (Mp). The inverse problem here is
finding f for given fields Y and C. If we know that (3) has a unique solution
for f then it can be found by solving
Z
M
tr(Y (p, q))f(q)dµ(q) = tr(C(p)),
(4)
an equation of type (1).
The importance of the class (3) of tensor equations is that it contains
the problem of recovering a distribution from its covariance field. Next, we
briefly pose this problem, while more details one can find in [1].
Let M be a Riemannian manifold with metric tensor G. For any p ∈M,
G(p) ∈T 2(Mp) is a co-variant 2-tensor.
Let Expp : Mp →M be the
exponential map at p and U(p) ⊂M be the maximal normal neighbor-
hood of p, where Exp−1
p
is well defined.
Note that since Exp−1
p q ∈Mp,
(Exp−1
p q)(Exp−1
p q)T ∈T2(Mp), a contra-variant 2-tensor. For a density func-
tion f ≥0 on M, the covariance operator field of f is GΣ : M →T 1
1 (M),
such that for any p ∈M
GΣ(p) :=
Z
U(p)
G(p)(Exp−1
p q)(Exp−1
p q)Tf(p)dV (p).
(5)
2
The problem of distribution recovering is of type (3) if we take µ = V ,
C = GΣ and Y (p, q) = G(p)(Exp−1
p q)(Exp−1
p q)T. Note that
tr(Y (p, q)) = tr(G(p)(Exp−1
p q)(Exp−1
p q)T) = d2(p, q),
is the square geodesic distance on M. Thus equation (4), specifically, is
Z
U(p)
d2(p, q)f(q)dV (q) = g(p).
(6)
In the context of problem (6) we are interested in finding the rank of an
integral operator of the form Lψ : f 7→
R
ψ(p, q)f(q)dV (q), where ψ(p, q) =
d2(p, q) is a square distance function on M. In particular, in section 3 we
study the rank of the Euclidean metric d(p, q) = ||p −q|| and the rank of the
standard metric on the unit sphere Sn, d(p, q) = cos−1(< p, q >), and show
that while the Euclidean metric is of finite rank, the metric on the sphere is
not. The last fact can be re-phrased as follows. For any discrete sample of
points on a sphere, the square matrix of pairwise distances is non-singular
with probability one.
The problem of establishing the non-singularity of the kernel of operator
(1) is important in the context of more general statistical inverse problems
on manifolds, as considered in [4], [11], [12] and [14]. Let g(p) = f(p) + ǫ,
where ǫ is a mean zero random variable with small variance, be a model with
unknown regression function f. For a kernel ψ, the inverse problem with
random noise is formulated as estimation of Lψf from observations (pi, gi).
In [4], Cavalier and Tsybakov estimate f from the model g = Lψf + ǫ, which
is a noised version of (1). Usually points pi are assumed
…(Full text truncated)…
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.