We establish unique continuation for various discrete nonlinear wave equations. For example, we show that if two solutions of the Toda lattice coincide for one lattice point in some arbitrarily small time interval, then they coincide everywhere. Moreover, we establish analogous results for the Toda, Kac-van Moerbeke, and Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchies. Although all these equations are integrable, the proof does not use integrability and can be adapted to other equations as well.
Deep Dive into Unique continuation for discrete nonlinear wave equations.
We establish unique continuation for various discrete nonlinear wave equations. For example, we show that if two solutions of the Toda lattice coincide for one lattice point in some arbitrarily small time interval, then they coincide everywhere. Moreover, we establish analogous results for the Toda, Kac-van Moerbeke, and Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchies. Although all these equations are integrable, the proof does not use integrability and can be adapted to other equations as well.
Unique continuation results for wave equations have a long tradition and seem to originate in control theory. One of the first results seems to be the one by Zhang [20], where he proves that if a short-range solution of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation vanishes on an open subset in the x/t-plane, then it must vanish everywhere. Since then, this result has been extended in various directions and for different equations (see for example [1], the introduction in [10] for the case of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, [5], [11], [12] for the generalized KdV equation, [14] for the Camassa-Holm equation).
However, all the results so far seem to only deal with wave equations which are continuous in the spatial direction and this clearly raises the question for such unique continuation results for wave equations which are discrete in the spatial variable. In particular, to the best of our knowledge, there are no results for example for the Toda equation, one of the most prominent discrete systems. While in principle the strategy from Zhang [20] would be applicable to the Toda lattice, it is the purpose of this paper to advocate a much simpler direct approach in the discrete case. We will start with the Toda lattice as our prototypical example and then show how the entire Toda hierarchy as well as the Kac-van Moerbeke and Ablowitz-Ladik hierarchies can be treated. It is important to stress that our approach does not use integrability of these equations and hence can be adapted to more general systems. On the other hand, our approach is restricted to one dimension in the spatial variable and thus does not apply to the discrete Schrödinger equation on Z d .
Due to the connections with localization for discrete Anderson-Bernoulli models, unique continuation for this model is an important open problem; see [2], [3].
In this section we want to treat the Toda lattice as the prototypical example. To this end, recall the Toda lattice [19] (in Flaschka’s variables [7])
where the dot denotes a derivative with respect to t. It is a well-studied physical model and one of the prototypical discrete integrable wave equations. We refer to the monographs [6], [16], [19] or the review articles [13], [17] for further information.
Theorem 2.1. Assume that a 0 (n, t), b 0 (n, t) and a(n, t), b(n, t) are complex-valued solutions of the Toda lattice (2.1) with a 0 (n, t) = 0 for all (n, t) ∈ Z × R such that there is one n 0 ∈ Z and two times t 0 < t 1 such that
for t ∈ (t 0 , t 1 ). Then
for all (n, t) ∈ Z × R.
Proof. It suffices to prove that (2.2) for n 0 implies (2.2) for n 0 -1 and n 0 + 1. We start with N 0 -1 and first observe that (2.1) implies that
and thus a(n 0 -1, t) 2 = a 0 (n 0 -1, t) 2 . Using this we compute
to conclude that a(n 0 + 1, t) 2 = a 0 (n 0 + 1, t) 2 . This finishes the proof.
It is worthwhile to note that the assumption a 0 (n, t) = 0 is crucial. In fact, if a 0 (n 0 , t) = 0 for one (and hence for all) t ∈ R, then the Toda lattice decouples into two independent parts to the left and right of n 0 , and the above result is clearly wrong. However, it remains valid on every consecutive number of points for which a 0 (n, t) = 0 holds true. In particular, our result applies to the half-line Toda lattice or to the finite Toda lattice.
As a simple consequence, this also proves that the propagation speed for the Toda lattice is finite.
Corollary 2.2. Let a(n, t) = 0, b(n, t) be a complex-valued solution of the Toda lattice (2.1) for which a(n, t 0 ) - 1 2 , b(n, t 0 ) is supported on a finite number of points n at some initial time t 0 . Then this does not remain true for t ∈ (t 0 , t 1 ) unless a(n, t) = 1 2 , b(n, t) = 0 for all (n, t) ∈ Z × R. In fact, in the case of real-valued solutions, one can even show the somewhat stronger result that a(n, t 0 ) - 1 2 , b(n, t 0 ) can be compactly supported for at most one time [18]. However, on the other hand, the Toda lattice does preserve certain asymptotic properties of the initial conditions; see again [18].
In this section we show that our main result extends to the entire Toda hierarchy (which will cover the Kac-van Moerbeke hierarchy as well). To this end, we introduce the Toda hierarchy using the standard Lax formalism following [4] (see also [9], [16]).
Associated with two sequences a(t) 2 = 0, b(t) is a Jacobi operator (3.1)
acting on sequences over Z, where
are the usual shift operators. Moreover, choose constants c 0 = 1, c j , 1 ≤ j ≤ r, c r+1 = 0, and set
where [A] ± denote the upper and lower triangular parts of an operator with respect to the standard basis δ m (n) = δ m,n (with δ m,n the usual Kronecker delta). Then the Toda hierarchy is equivalent to the Lax equation
where [A, B] = AB -BA is the usual commutator. Abbreviating
for the r-th equation TL r (a, b) = 0 in the Toda hierarchy (where N 0 = N ∪ {0}).
Our main point in this section is the following generalization of Theorem 2.1 to the entire Toda hierarchy: Theorem 3.1. Assu
…(Full text truncated)…
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.