Econophysics: historical perspectives

Reading time: 5 minute
...

📝 Original Info

  • Title: Econophysics: historical perspectives
  • ArXiv ID: 0802.1416
  • Date: 2008-12-02
  • Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper

📝 Abstract

Econophysics embodies the recent upsurge of interest by physicists into financial economics, driven by the availability of large amount of data, job shortage in physics and the possibility of applying many-body techniques developed in statistical and theoretical physics to the understanding of the self-organizing economy. This brief historical survey emphasizes that Econophysics has many historical precursors, and is in fact rooted in a continuous cross-fertilization between economics and physics that has been active in the last centuries.

💡 Deep Analysis

Deep Dive into Econophysics: historical perspectives.

Econophysics embodies the recent upsurge of interest by physicists into financial economics, driven by the availability of large amount of data, job shortage in physics and the possibility of applying many-body techniques developed in statistical and theoretical physics to the understanding of the self-organizing economy. This brief historical survey emphasizes that Econophysics has many historical precursors, and is in fact rooted in a continuous cross-fertilization between economics and physics that has been active in the last centuries.

📄 Full Content

1 Book Encyclopedia of Quantitative Finance, edited by Rama Cont www.wiley.com/go/eqf

Section History of Quantitative Modeling in Finance (1st section out of 21), edited by Perry Mehrling and Murad Taqqu

Entry Econophysics: historical perspectives By Gilles Daniel and Didier Sornette

Title: Econophysics: historical perspectives Contributors: Gilles Daniel and Didier Sornette Affiliation: ETH Zurich, Chair of Entrepreneurial Risks, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, Zurich

Keywords: Econophysics, history, multi-collisions, random walks, diffusion, Bachelier, Einstein, Pareto, Samuelson, Mandelbrot, Fama

Abstract: Econophysics embodies the recent upsurge of interest by physicists into financial economics, driven by the availability of large amount of data, job shortage in physics and the possibility of applying many-body techniques developed in statistical and theoretical physics to the understanding of the self-organizing economy. This brief historical survey emphasizes that Econophysics has many historical precursors, and is in fact rooted in a continuous cross-fertilization between economics and physics that has been active in the last centuries.

Main text The term Econophysics was introduced circa 1994, endorsed in 1999 by the publication of its founding book, Mantegna-Stanley’s “An Introduction to Econophysics” (1999). The word “econophysics” suggests that there is a physical approach to economics, perhaps even that economics can be rooted in physics, paralleling the quests of biophysics or geophysics.

Indeed, all along its developments, from classical to neo-classical economics and till the present time, economists have been inspired by the conceptual and mathematical developments of the physical sciences and by their remarkable successes in describing and predicting natural phenomena. Reciprocally, physics has been enriched several times by developments first observed in economics. Well before the christening of econophysics as the incarnation of the multidisciplinary study of complex large-scale financial and economic systems, a multiple of small and large collisions have punctuated the development of these two fields. Let us now mention a few that illustrate the remarkable commonalities and inter-fertilization.

In his “Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” (1776), Adam Smith found inspiration in the Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)

2 of Isaac Newton, specifically based on the (novel at the time) notion of causative forces. The recognition of the importance of feedbacks to fathom the sheer complexity of economic systems has been at the root of economic thinking for a long time. Towards the end of the 19th century, the microeconomists Francis Edgeworth and Alfred Marshall drew on some of the ideas of physicists to develop the notion that the economy achieves an equilibrium state like that described for gases by Clerk Maxwell and Ludwig Boltzmann. The general equilibrium theory now at the core of much of economic thinking is nothing but a formalization of the idea that “everything in the economy affects everything else” (Krugman, 1996), reminiscent of mean-field theory or self-consistent effective medium methods in physics, but emphasizing and transcending these ideas much beyond their initial sense in physics.

While developing the field of microeconomics in his “Cours d’Economie Politique”
(1897), the economist and philosopher Vilfredo Pareto was the first to describe, for the distribution of incomes, the eponym power-laws that would later become the center of attention of Physicists and other scientists observing this remarkable and universal statistical signature in the distribution of event sizes (earthquakes, avalanches, landslides, storms, forest fires, solar flares, commercial sales, war sizes, and so on) punctuating so many natural and social systems [Mandelbrot, 1982; Bak, 1996; Newman, 2005; Sornette, 2006].

While attempting to model the erratic motion of bonds and stock options in the Paris Bourse in 1900, mathematician Louis Bachelier developed the mathematical theory of diffusion (and the first elements of financial option pricing) and solved the parabolic diffusion equation five years before Albert Einstein (1905) established the theory of Brownian motion based on the same diffusion equation (also underpinning the theory of random walks). The ensuing modern theory of random walks now constitutes one of the fundamental pillars of theoretical physics and economics and finance models.

In the early 1960s, mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot (1963) pioneered the use in Financial Economics of heavy-tailed distributions (Lévy stable laws) as opposed to the traditional Gaussian (Normal) law. A cohort of economists, notably at the University of Chicago (Merton Miller, Eugene Fama, Richard Roll), at MIT (Paul Samuelson) and at Carnegie Mellon

…(Full text truncated)…

Reference

This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut