📝 Original Info
- Title: Angles as probabilities
- ArXiv ID: 0809.3459
- Date: 2008-09-23
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
We use a probabilistic interpretation of solid angles to generalize the well-known fact that the inner angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees. For the 3-dimensional case, we show that the sum of the solid inner vertex angles of a tetrahedron T, divided by 2*pi, gives the probability that an orthogonal projection of T onto a random 2-plane is a triangle. More generally, it is shown that the sum of the (solid) inner vertex angles of an n-simplex S, normalized by the area of the unit (n-1)-hemisphere, gives the probability that an orthogonal projection of S onto a random hyperplane is an (n-1)-simplex. Applications to more general polytopes are treated briefly, as is the related Perles-Shephard proof of the classical Gram-Euler relations.
💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Angles as probabilities.
We use a probabilistic interpretation of solid angles to generalize the well-known fact that the inner angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees. For the 3-dimensional case, we show that the sum of the solid inner vertex angles of a tetrahedron T, divided by 2*pi, gives the probability that an orthogonal projection of T onto a random 2-plane is a triangle. More generally, it is shown that the sum of the (solid) inner vertex angles of an n-simplex S, normalized by the area of the unit (n-1)-hemisphere, gives the probability that an orthogonal projection of S onto a random hyperplane is an (n-1)-simplex. Applications to more general polytopes are treated briefly, as is the related Perles-Shephard proof of the classical Gram-Euler relations.
📄 Full Content
arXiv:0809.3459v1 [math.MG] 19 Sep 2008
Angles as probabilities
David V. Feldman
Daniel A. Klain
Almost everyone knows that the inner angles of a triangle sum to 180o. But
if you ask the typical mathematician how to sum the solid inner angles over the
vertices of a tetrahedron, you are likely to receive a blank stare or a mystified
shrug. In some cases you may be directed to the Gram-Euler relations for higher
dimensional polytopes [3, 4, 6, 7], a 19th century result unjustly consigned to
relative obscurity. But the answer is really much simpler than that, and here it is:
The sum of the solid inner vertex angles of a tetrahedron T,
divided by 2π, gives the probability that the orthogonal projection
of T onto a random 2-plane is a triangle.
How simple is that? We will prove a more general theorem (Theorem 1) for
simplices in Rn, but first consider the analogous assertion in R2. The sum in
radians of the angles of a triangle (2-simplex) T, when divided by the length π of
the unit semicircle, gives the probability that the orthogonal projection of T onto
a random line is a convex segment (1-simplex). Since this is always the case, the
probability is equal to 1, and the inner angle sum for every triangle is the same.
By contrast, a higher dimensional n-simplex may project one dimension down
either to an (n −1)-simplex or to a lower dimensional convex polytope having
n + 1 vertices. The inner angle sum gives a measure of how often each of these
possibilities occurs.
Let us make the notion of “inner angle” more precise. Denote by Sn−1 the
unit sphere in Rn centered at the origin. Recall that Sn−1 has (n −1)-dimensional
volume (i.e. surface area) nωn, where ωn =
πn/2
Γ(1+n/2) is the Euclidean volume of the
unit ball in Rn.
Suppose that P is a convex polytope in Rn, and let v be any point of P. The
solid inner angle aP(v) of P at v is given by
aP(v) = {u ∈Sn−1 | v + ǫu ∈P
for some ǫ > 0}
Let αP(v) denote the measure of the solid angle aP(v) ⊆Sn−1, given by the usual
surface area measure on subsets of the sphere. For the moment we are primarily
concerned with values of αP(v) when v is a vertex of P.
If u is a unit vector, then denote by Pu the orthogonal projection of P onto the
subspace u⊥in Rn. Let v be a vertex of P. The projection vu lies in the relative
interior of Pu if and only if there exists ǫ ∈(−1, 1) such that v + ǫu lies in the
interior of P. This holds iffu ∈±aP(v). If u is a random unit vector in Sn−1, then
(1)
Probability[vu ∈relative interior(Pu)] = 2αP(v)
nωn
,
This gives the probability that vu is no longer a vertex of Pu.
1
2
For simplices we now obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 1 (Simplicial Angle Sums). Let ∆be an n-simplex in Rn, and let u be a
random unit vector. Denote by p∆the probability that the orthogonal projection
∆u is an (n −1)-simplex. Then
(2)
p∆=
2
nωn
X
v
α∆(v)
where the sum is taken over all vertices of the simplex ∆.
Proof. Since ∆is an n-simplex, ∆has n + 1 vertices, and a projection ∆u has
either n or n + 1 vertices. (Since ∆u spans an affine space of dimension n −1, it
cannot have fewer than n vertices.) In other words, either exactly 1 vertex of ∆
falls to the relative interior of ∆u, so that ∆u is an (n −1)-simplex, or none of them
do. By the law of alternatives, the probability p∆is now given by the sum of the
probabilities (1), taken over all vertices of the simplex ∆.
□
The probability (2) is always equal to 1 for 2-dimensional simplices (triangles).
For 3-simplices (tetrahedra) the probability may take any value 0 < p∆< 1. To
obtain a value closer to one, consider the convex hull of an equilateral triangle in
R3 with a point outside the triangle, but very close to its center. To obtain p∆close
to zero, consider the convex hull of two skew line segments in R3 whose centers
are very close together (forming a tetrahedron that is almost a parallelogram).
Similarly, for n ≥3 the solid vertex angle sum of an n-simplex varies within a
range
0 <
X
v
αT(v) < nωn
2 .
Equality at either end is obtained only if one allows for the degenerate limiting
cases. These bounds were obtained earlier by Gaddum [1, 2], using a more com-
plicated (and non-probabilistic) approach.
Similar considerations apply to the solid angles at arbitrary faces of convex
polytopes. If F is a face of a convex polytope P, denote the centroid of F by
ˆF, and define the solid inner angle measure αP(F) = αP( ˆF), using the definition
above for the solid angle at a point in P. In analogy to (1), we have
(3)
Probability[ ˆFu ∈relative interior(Pu)] = 2αP(F)
nωn
,
Omitting cases of measures zero, this gives the probability that a proper face F is
no longer a face of Pu. (Note that dim Fu = dim F for all directions u except a set
of measure zero.) Taking complements, we have
(4)
Probability[Fu is a proper face of Pu] = 1 −2αP(F)
nωn
.
For 0 ≤k ≤n −1, denote by fk(P) the number of k-dimensional faces of a
polytope P. The sum of the probabilities (4) gives the expected number of k-faces
3
of the projection of P onto a
…(Full text truncated)…
📸 Image Gallery
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.