📝 Original Info
- Title: Performance Comparison of Cooperative and Distributed Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio
- ArXiv ID: 0809.3283
- Date: 2008-09-22
- Authors: Researchers from original ArXiv paper
📝 Abstract
In this paper, we compare the performances of cooperative and distributed spectrum sensing in wireless sensor networks. After introducing the basic problem, we describe two strategies: 1) a cooperative sensing strategy, which takes advantage of cooperation diversity gain to increase probability of detection and 2) a distributed sensing strategy, which by passing the results in an inter-node manner increases energy efficiency and fairness among nodes. Then, we compare the performances of the strategies in terms of three criteria: agility, energy efficiency, and robustness against SNR changes, and summarize the comparison. It shows that: 1) the non-cooperative strategy has the best fairness of energy consumption, 2) the cooperative strategy leads to the best agility, and 3) the distributed strategy leads to the lowest energy consumption and the best robustness against SNR changes.
💡 Deep Analysis
Deep Dive into Performance Comparison of Cooperative and Distributed Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio.
In this paper, we compare the performances of cooperative and distributed spectrum sensing in wireless sensor networks. After introducing the basic problem, we describe two strategies: 1) a cooperative sensing strategy, which takes advantage of cooperation diversity gain to increase probability of detection and 2) a distributed sensing strategy, which by passing the results in an inter-node manner increases energy efficiency and fairness among nodes. Then, we compare the performances of the strategies in terms of three criteria: agility, energy efficiency, and robustness against SNR changes, and summarize the comparison. It shows that: 1) the non-cooperative strategy has the best fairness of energy consumption, 2) the cooperative strategy leads to the best agility, and 3) the distributed strategy leads to the lowest energy consumption and the best robustness against SNR changes.
📄 Full Content
1
Performance Comparison of Cooperative and
Distributed Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio
Zheng SUN, Wenjun XU, Zhiqiang HE and Kai NIU
School of Information Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
zhengs.bupt@gmail.com
Abstract—In this paper, we compare the performances of
cooperative and distributed spectrum sensing in wireless sensor
networks. After introducing the basic problem, we describe two
strategies: 1) a cooperative sensing strategy, which takes
advantage of cooperation diversity gain to increase probability of
detection and 2) a distributed sensing strategy, which by passing
the results in an inter-node manner increases energy efficiency
and fairness among nodes. Then, we compare the performances of
the strategies in terms of three criteria: agility, energy efficiency,
and robustness against SNR changes, and summarize the
comparison. It shows that: 1) the non-cooperative strategy has the
best fairness of energy consumption, 2) the cooperative strategy
leads to the best agility, and 3) the distributed strategy leads to the
lowest energy consumption and the best robustness against SNR
changes.
Index Terms— cooperative sensing, distributed sensing,
cognitive radio networks.
I. INTRODUCTION
Recently the field of cognitive radio (CR) has drawn great
interest, since this novel technology provides promising
solution to enhance the spectrum efficiency of today’s wireless
network. Studies have shown that spectrum is extremely
underutilized [1]. One way to increase the utilization is to
design CR networks, where wireless equipments use smart
radio to detect temporal and spatial “holes” in the spectrum,
thus learn from the environment and perform further functions
to serve the users.
A significant feature of CR networks is to allow users to
operate in licensed bands without a license. However, since CR
has to limit its interference to the primary network, CR users
using a licensed band must vacate the band due to the presence
of the primary user. Thus it is significant to detect the presence
of licensed (primary) users by spectrum sensing in a very short
time. Recent work considers how to take advantage of the local
oscillator leakage power emitted from RF receivers to allow
cognitive radios to sense and locate the primary users [2]. Some
physical layer issues of spectrum sensing are discussed in [3].
For radio sensitivity of the sensing function through processing
gain, the authors of [4] study three digital signal processing
techniques.
In this paper, we are going to discuss how to deal with
spectrum sensing in wireless sensor networks (WSN). Related
work includes [2], which gives a physical layer and MAC layer
solution of sensor nodes but lacks further designing on network
architecture. Rather, we will discuss two strategies for efficient
spectrum sensing in WSN. The first is cooperative sensing.
Cooperative techniques are widely studied recently ([5]-[8]) to
achieve a new form of spatial diversity via the cooperation of
users [5]. In [6], the authors study two-user cooperative
spectrum sensing in cognitive radio and show that, by allowing
the cognitive users operating in the same band to cooperate, the
detection time reduces and thus the overall agility increases. In
[7], light-weight cooperation in sensing based on hard decision
is proposed to mitigate the sensitivity requirements on
individual radios. And in [8], the cooperative situations are
considered by using game theory, and the authors show how the
lack of cooperation affects the performance. In this paper, the
cooperative sensing is described in a multi-node WSN network,
in which multi-user diversity gain is further achieved.
The second strategy being discussed is distributed spectrum
sensing, which is specialized from distributed learning and
estimation theory [10]. To our best knowledge, distributed
spectrum sensing is a rather fresh topic. The reason of adopting
distributed spectrum sensing in WSN is twofold. Firstly,
traditional cooperation in WSN needs node
fusion center
transmissions with length of
→
( )1
O
, while distributed sensing
strategy adopts inter-node transmissions with length of
only (
)
2
log n n
O
[9], which therefore reduces energy costs
and increases overall network longevity. Secondly, in this
paper we show that by using distributed sensing strategy, the
probability of detection at the fusion center is greatly increased
comparing with both non-cooperative and cooperative sensing
strategy.
The main purpose of this paper is to present strategies of
cooperative and distributed spectrum sensing in WSN, and to
compare their performances in terms of agility, energy
efficiency, and robustness against SNR changes. The results
drawn here may act as a reference for further researches.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II,
we describe the basic problem and a non-cooperative spec
…(Full text truncated)…
📸 Image Gallery
Reference
This content is AI-processed based on ArXiv data.