Understanding individual human mobility patterns
Despite their importance for urban planning, traffic forecasting, and the spread of biological and mobile viruses, our understanding of the basic laws governing human motion remains limited thanks to the lack of tools to monitor the time resolved loc…
Authors: M.C. Gonzalez, C.A. Hidalgo, A.-L. Barabasi
Understandin g indi vidual hu man mobility patter ns Marta C. Gonz ´ alez, 1, 2 C ´ esar A. Hidalgo, 1 and Albert-L ´ aszl ´ o Barab ´ asi 1, 2, 3 1 Center for Comple x Network Resear c h and D epartmen t of P hysics and Computer Science , Univer sity of N otr e Dame, Notr e Dame IN 46556. 2 Center for Complex Network Resear c h and Department of Physics, Biolog y and Compute r Science , Northeas tern University , Boston MA 0 2115. 3 Center for Ca ncer Systems Bio log y , Dana F arber Cancer Institu te, Boston, MA 02115. (Dated: Nove mber 26, 2024) Despite their importance f or urban planning [1], traffic for ecasting [2], and the spread of biological [3, 4, 5] and mobile viruses [6], our understanding of the basic laws gover n- ing human motion remains li mi ted thanks to the l ack of tools to monitor the ti me resolved location of individuals. Here we s tudy the trajectory of 100 , 000 anonymized mobile phone users whose position is tracke d f or a six month period. W e find that in contrast w i th the random trajectories predicted by the prev ailing L ´ evy flight and random wa l k models [7], human trajectories s how a high degree of temporal a nd spatial regu larity , each individual being characterized by a time indepe ndent characteristic length scale and a significant pr ob- ability to r etur n to a few highly fr equented locations. After correcting for differ ences in tra vel distances and the inherent anisotr opy of each trajectory , the individual tra vel p atterns collapse i nto a singl e spatial probability distribution, indicating that despite the diversity of their travel history , humans follow simple repr o ducible patterns. This inher ent simil arity in trav el pattern s could impact all phenomena driven by human mobil i ty , fr om epidemic pr ev ention to emergency re sponse, urban planning and agent based modeling. Giv en the many unknown f actors that i nfluence a po pulation’ s mobil ity patterns, ranging from means of transportation to job and family imposed restrictions and priori ties, human trajectories are often approxim ated wit h various random walk or diffusion m odels [7, 8]. Indeed, early mea- surements on albatros ses, b umblebees, deer and m onkeys [ 9, 10] and m ore recent ones on m arine predators [11] sugg ested t hat ani mal trajec tory is approxim ated by a L ´ evy fl ight [12, 13], a random walk whose step size ∆ r follows a powe r -law distrib ution P (∆ r ) ∼ ∆ r − (1+ β ) with β < 2 . While the L ´ evy statist ics for some anim als require furth er study [14], Brockmann et al . [7] generalized this finding to humans, docum enting that the distribution of di stances between consecutive sight- 2 ings of nearly half-million bank notes is fat tailed. Giv en th at money is carried by individuals, bank note d ispersal i s a proxy for human movement, suggest ing that human trajectories are best modeled as a continuo us tim e random walk wit h fat tailed displacements and waiting tim e dis- tributions [7]. A particle following a L ´ evy flight has a sign ificant probability t o travel very long distances in a si ngle step [12, 13], which appears to be c onsistent with human t ra vel patt erns: m ost of the tim e we trav el onl y over short dist ances, between hom e and work, while occasionally we take longer trips. Each consecutive sighti ngs of a bank not e reflects the com posite mo tion of two or more in di- viduals, who owned the bill between two reported sighti ngs. Thus it is not clear i f the observed distribution reflects t he mo tion of individual users, or so me hit ero u nknown con volution between population based heterogeneiti es and i ndividual human trajectories. Contrary to bank not es, mo- bile phones are carried by the same individual during his/her daily routine, of fering the best proxy to capture individual human trajectories [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. W e used two d ata sets t o explore the mo bility pattern of individuals. The first ( D 1 ) cons ists of the mobili ty patterns recorded over a six month period for 100 , 000 individuals selected randomly from a sam ple of over 6 m illion anonymized m obile phone us ers. Each tim e a user initiates or recei ves a call or SMS, the location of the t ower r outing the communi cation is recorded, allowing us t o reconstruct the user’ s time resolved trajectory (Figs. 1a and b). The time between consecutive calls follows a b ursty pattern [20] (see Fig. S1 in the SM), in dicating that whi le most consecutive calls are placed soon after a pre vious call, occasionally there are long periods without an y call activity . T o make sure t hat the obtained results are not affec ted by the irregular call patt ern, we also study a data set ( D 2 ) that captures the location of 206 mobile phone users, re corded e very two hours for an ent ire week. In b oth datasets the spatial resolution is determi ned by the local dens ity of the m ore than 10 4 mobile towers, registering movement o nly when the user moves between areas serviced by dif ferent to wers. T he a verage service area of each tower is a pproximately 3 km 2 and over 30% of the t ower s cov er an are a of 1 km 2 or less. T o explore the stat istical properties of the pop ulation’ s mo bility patterns we measured the dis- tance bet ween user’ s p ositions at consecutive calls, captu ring 16 , 264 , 308 disp lacements for the D 1 and 10 , 407 displ acements for t he D 2 datasets. W e find t hat the dist ribution of displacements over all users is well approximated by a truncated po wer -law P (∆ r ) = (∆ r + ∆ r 0 ) − β exp ( − ∆ r /κ ) , (1) 3 with β = 1 . 75 ± 0 . 15 , ∆ r 0 = 1 . 5 km and cutof f values κ | D 1 = 400 km, and κ | D 2 = 80 km (Fig. 1c, see the SM for statis tical validation). Note th at the o bserved scalin g exponent is not far from β B = 1 . 59 observed in Ref. [7] for bank note dispersal, suggesting that the two distrib utions may capture the same fundamental mechanism dri ving human mobility patterns. Equation (1) suggests that human motion follows a truncated L ´ evy flight [7]. Y et, the observed shape o f P (∆ r ) could b e explained by three distinct hy potheses: A. Each individual follows a L ´ evy trajectory wi th jump size dis tribution giv en by (1). B. The observed d istribution captures a population based heterogeneity , c orresponding to the inherent dif ferences between individuals. C. A pop ulation based h eterogeneity coexists w ith i ndividual L ´ evy trajectories, hence (1) represents a con volution of hypothesis A and B . T o disting uish between hypot heses A, B and C we calcul ated the radius of gyrati on for each user (see Methods), interpreted as t he typical distance trav eled by user a when observed up to time t (Fig. 1b). Next, we determined t he radius of gyration distribution P ( r g ) by calculati ng r g for all users in samples D 1 and D 2 , finding that they also can b e approximat ed with a truncated power -law P ( r g ) = ( r g + r 0 g ) − β r exp ( − r g /κ ) , (2) with r 0 g = 5 . 8 km , β r = 1 . 65 ± 0 . 1 5 and κ = 350 km (Fig. 1d, see SM for statis tical validation). L ´ evy flights are characterized b y a high degree of intrins ic heterogeneity , raising the possibi lity that (2) could emerge from an ensemble o f ident ical agents, each following a L ´ evy trajectory . Therefore, we d etermined P ( r g ) for an ensemble of agents following a Random W alk ( RW ), L ´ evy-Flight ( LF ) or T runcated L ´ evy-Flight ( T LF ) (Figu re 1d) [8, 12, 13]. W e find th at an en- semble o f L ´ evy agents d isplay a s ignificant d egree of heterogeneit y in r g , yet is not sufficient to explain the truncated power l aw dist ribution P ( r g ) exhibited by the mobile phone us ers. T aken together , Figs. 1c and d suggest that the dif ference in the range of typical mobility patterns of indi- viduals ( r g ) h as a s trong impact on the t runcated L ´ evy behavior seen in (1), ruling out hypothesi s A. If ind ividual trajectories are described by a LF or T LF , then the radius of gyration should increase i n t ime as r g ( t ) ∼ t 3 / (2+ β ) [21, 22] while for a RW r g ( t ) ∼ t 1 / 2 . That is, th e l onger we observe a user , the higher t he chances that she/ he will trav el to areas not vi sited before. T o check the validity of these predicti ons we measured the ti me dependence of the radius o f g yration for users whose gyration radi us would be considered sm all ( r g ( T ) ≤ 3 km ), mediu m ( 20 < r g ( T ) ≤ 30 km) or lar ge ( r g ( T ) > 100 km) at the end of our observation period ( T = 6 mo nths). The 4 results indicate that t he t ime dependence of t he av erage radius of gyration of mobile phone users is bett er approxi mated by a logarithmi c increase, not only a manifestly slower d ependence th an the one predicted by a power law , but one that m ay appear s imilar to a s aturation process (Fig. 2a and Fig. S4). In Fig. 2 b, we ha ve chosen us ers with similar as ymptotic r g ( T ) after T = 6 months , and measured the jump size distrib ution P (∆ r | r g ) for each group. As the inset of Fig. 2b sho ws, users with small r g tra vel most ly over small distances, whereas thos e wit h large r g tend to display a combination of m any sm all and a few larger jump sizes. Once we rescale the distributions wit h r g (Fig. 2b), we find that the data collapses into a si ngle curve, sugges ting that a single jump size distribution characterizes al l users, independent of their r g . This indicates t hat P (∆ r | r g ) ∼ r − α g F (∆ r /r g ) , where α ≈ 1 . 2 ± 0 . 1 and F ( x ) is an r g independent function with asym ptotic beha vior F ( x < 1) ∼ x − α and rapidly decreasing for x ≫ 1 . Therefore the trav el patterns of i ndividual users m ay be approxi mated by a L ´ evy flight up to a di stance characterized by r g . Most important, h owe ver , is the fact that the ind ividual trajectori es are bou nded beyond r g , thus lar ge displacements which are the source of t he distinct and anom alous nature of L ´ evy flights, are statisti cally absent. T o understand the relations hip between the diffe rent exponents, we note that the measured probability distributions are related by P (∆ r ) = R ∞ 0 P (∆ r | r g ) P ( r g ) dr g , which suggests (see SM) that up to the leading order we hav e β = β r + α − 1 , c onsistent, within error bar s, with the m easured exponents. Thi s in dicates that t he observed jump s ize dist ribution P (∆ r ) i s in fact the con volution between the statistics of indi vidual trajectories P (∆ r g | r g ) and the population heterogeneity P ( r g ) , consistent with hypothesis C. T o uncov er the mechanism stabil izing r g we measured the return probabili ty for each indi- vidual F pt ( t ) [22], defined as the probability that a user returns to the position w here it was first observed after t hours (Fig. 2c). For a two dim ensional random walk F pt ( t ) should foll ow ∼ 1 / ( t ln( t ) 2 ) [22]. In contrast, we find that the return probability is characterized by s e veral peaks at 24 h, 48 h , and 72 h, capturing a stron g tendency of h umans to return to lo cations they vi sited before, describing the recurrence and temporal periodicity inherent to human mobility [23, 24]. T o explore if ind ividuals return to t he same location over and over , we ranked each l ocation based on the num ber of tim es an in dividual was recorded in its v icinity , such that a location with L = 3 represents the t hird most visited location for the selected individual. W e find that the probability of findi ng a user at a location with a gi ven rank L i s well approximat ed by P ( L ) ∼ 1 /L , independent of the number of locations visited by the user (Fig. 2d). Therefore people dev ote most 5 of their time to a fe w locations, while spending their r emaining time in 5 to 50 places, visited with diminish ed re gularity . Therefore, the observ ed logarithmic saturation of r g ( t ) is rooted in the high degree o f regularity in their daily tra vel patterns, captured by the high re turn probabilities (Fig. 2b) to a few highly frequented locations (Fig. 2d). An important quantity for modeling human mobility patterns is the probability Φ a ( x, y ) to find an individual a in a given position ( x, y ). As it is evident from Fig. 1b, in dividuals li ve and tra vel in different regions, yet each u ser can be ass igned to a well defined area, defined b y home and workplace, where she or he can be found most of the time. W e can compare the trajectories o f diffe rent users by diagonalizing each trajectory’ s inerti a tensor , providing the probability of finding a user in a giv en position (see Fig. 3a) in the us er’ s intrinsic reference frame (see SM for the details). A st riking feature of Φ( x, y ) is i ts prominent spati al anisotropy in this int rinsic reference frame (note the different scales in Fig 3a), and we find that t he larger an individual’ s r g the more pronounced is this ani sotropy . T o quantify t his effec t we defined t he anisot ropy ratio S ≡ σ y /σ x , where σ x and σ y represent the standard deviation of the trajectory measured in the u ser’ s i ntrinsic reference frame (see SM). W e find that S decreases monoton ically with r g (Fig. 3c), bein g well approximated with S ∼ r − η g , for η ≈ 0 . 12 . Gi ven the small value o f the scaling exponent, other functional forms may of fer an equally good fit, thus mechanistic models are required to identify if this represents a true scaling law , or only a reasonable approximation to the data. T o compare t he t rajectories o f dif ferent users we remove t he in dividual anis otropies, rescal- ing each user trajectory with it s respectiv e σ x and σ y . The rescaled ˜ Φ( x/σ x , y /σ y ) di stribution (Fig. 3b) is similar for groups of users with considerably differ ent r g , i.e. , after the anisotropy and the r g dependence is removed all individuals appear to follo w the same uni versal ˜ Φ( ˜ x, ˜ y ) prob- ability distribution. This is particularly e vi dent in Fig. 3d, where we s how the cross section of ˜ Φ( x/σ x , 0) for th e t hree g roups of us ers, finding t hat apart from th e n oise in the data the curves are indisti nguishable. T aken together , our results suggest that the L ´ evy statistics observed in bank note measurements capture a con volution of the population heterogeneity (2) a nd the motion of indi vidual users. Indi - viduals display sig nificant regularity , as the y return to a fe w highly frequented locations, l ike home or work. This regularity do es not apply to the bank notes: a bill always follows the trajectory of its current owner , i.e. dollar bills diff use, b ut humans do not. The fact that individual trajectories are characterized by the sam e r g -independent t wo d imen- sional p robability di stribution ˜ Φ( x/σ x , y /σ y ) suggests that key s tatistical characteristics of indi- 6 vidual trajectories are lar gely indistinguishable after re scaling. Therefore, our results establish the basic ingredients of realistic agent based models, requiring us t o place users in nu mber propor- tional with the p opulation density of a gi ven region and assig n each user an r g taken from t he observed P ( r g ) dis tribution. Using the predicted anisotropic rescaling, combined with the density function ˜ Φ( x, y ) , whose shape is provided as T able 1 in the SM, we can obtain the li kelihood of finding a user in any l ocation. Gi ven the known correlations between spatial proximity and social links, our results could help quantify the role of space in network de velopment and ev olu- tion [25, 26, 27, 28, 29] and improve our understanding of dif fusion processes [8, 30]. W e thank D. Brockmann, T . Geisel, J. Park, S. Redner , Z. T oroczkai and P . W ang for discus- sions and com ments on th e m anuscript. This work was supported by the James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Initi ativ e in Studyi ng Complex System s, th e Nat ional Science Founda- tion w ithin the DDD AS (CNS-0540348), ITR (DMR-0426737 ) and IIS-0513650 programs, and the U.S. Office of Na v al Research A w ard N0001 4-07-C. Data analysis was performed on the Notre Dame Biocompl exity Cluster supported in part by NSF MRI Grant No. DBI-0420980. C.A. Hi - dalgo ackno wledges support from the K ellogg Institute at Notre Dame. Supplemen tary Inf ormation is linked to the online version of the paper at www .nature.com/ nature. A uthor Information Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.- L.B. (e-mail: alb@nd.edu) 7 [1] Horner , M.W . & O’Kel ly , M.E.S Em beddin g economies of scale concepts for hub network s design. J ourna l of T ransport ation Geog rap hy 9 , 255-265 (2001). [2] Kitamura, R., C hen, C ., Pendyala, R.M. & Narayaran, R. Micro-si mulation of daily acti vity- tra vel pattern s for tra v el demand forecastin g. T rans portat ion 27 , 25-51 (2000) . [3] Colizza, V ., Barrat, A., Barth ´ el ´ emy , M., V allero n, A.-J. & V espignani , A . Modeling the W orldwide Spread of Pand emic Influenza: Baseline Case an d Containment Interv entio ns. PLoS Medicine 4 , 095 - 0110 (2007). [4] E ubank , S., Guclu, H ., Kumar , V .S.A., Marathe, M. V ., Srini v asan, A., T oroczkai, Z. & W ang, N. Controll ing Epidemic s in Realistic Urban S ocial Network s. Natur e 429 , 180 (2004 ). [5] Hufnagel, L ., Brockmann, D. & Geisel, T . Forecas t and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Pr oceeding s of the N ationa l Academy of Sciences of the United State s of America 101 , 15124 -1512 9 (2004 ). [6] Kleinber g, J. The wireless epide mic. N atur e 449 , 287-288 (2007). [7] D. Brockmann , D., Hufnagel, L . & Geisel, T . The scaling la ws of human tra vel. Natur e 439 , 462-4 65 (2006 ). [8] Havlin, S. & ben-A vraham, D. Diffus ion in D isorder ed Media. Advances in Physics 51 , 187-292 (2002 ). [9] V iswanathan, G. M., Afanasye v , V ., Buldyre v , S.V ., Murphy , E .J., Prince, P .A. & Stanley , H. E. L ´ evy Flight Search Patter ns of W andering Albatrosse s. Natur e 381 , 413-415 (199 6). [10] Ramos-Fernandez , G., Mateos, J.L., Miramontes , O ., Cocho, G ., Larralde, H . & A yala-Orozc o, B., L ´ evy wal k patterns in t he fo raging mo vements of spider monk eys (Ateles g eof froyi). Behavi ora l ecol- ogy and Soc iobio log y 55 , 223- 230 (2004). [11] Sims D. W . et al. Scaling laws of marine pred ator search beha viou r . Natur e 451 , 1098 -1102 (2008). [12] Klafter , J., S hlesin ger , M.F . & Zumofen, G. Bey ond Brownian Motio n. Physic s T oday 49 , 33-39 (1996 ). [13] Mantegna , R.N . & Stanley , H .E. Stochas tic Process with Ultraslo w Con ver gence to a Gaussian: The T runca ted L ´ evy Flight. Physical Rev iew Letter s 73 , 2946-29 49 (1994). [14] Edwards, A.M., Phillips, R.A. , W atkins,N.W ., Freeman, M.P ., Murph y , E.J., Afan asye v , V ., Buldyre v , S.V ., da L uz, M.G.E., Raposo, E. P ., Stanley , H. E. & V iswanathan , G. M. R e visitin g L ´ evy flight 8 search pattern s of wand ering albatrosse s, b umblebe es and deer . N atur e 449 , 1044-1049 (2007). [15] Sohn, T . , V arsha vsk y , A., LaMarca, A., C hen, M.Y ., Choudhury , T ., Smith, I., C onsolv o, S., High- to wer , J., Griswold, W .G. & de Lara, E. Lectur e Notes in C omputer Science s: Pr oc. 8th Internatio nal Confer ence UbiComp 200 6 . (Springer , Berlin, 2006). [16] Onnela, J.-P ., Saram ¨ aki, J., Hyv ¨ on en, J., Szab ´ o, G., Lazer , D ., Kaski, K., Ke rt ´ esz, K. & Barab ´ asi A.L. Structure and tie strengt hs in mobile communica tion networks. Pr ocee dings of the National Academy of Science s of the United State s of Am erica 104 , 7332- 7336 (2007). [17] Gonz ´ alez, M.C. & Barab ´ asi, A. -L. C omple x networks : From data to models. Natur e Physics 3 , 224- 225 (2007 ). [18] Palla,G., B arab ´ asi, A.-L. & V icsek , T . Quantif ying social group ev olution. Natur e 446 , 664-667 (2007 ). [19] Hidalgo C .A. & Rodrigu ez-Sick ert C. The dynamic s of a mobi le phone network. Physica A 387 , 3017- 30224 . [20] Barab ´ asi, A.-L . The or igin of b ursts and he a vy tails in human dyn amics. Natur e 435 , 20 7-211 (2005 ). [21] Hughes, B.D. Random W alks and Random En vir onments . (Oxford Uni versity Press, US A, 199 5). [22] Redner , S. A Guide to F irst-P assag e Pr ocesses . (Cambridge Univ ersity Press, UK, 200 1). [23] Schlich, R. & Axhau sen, K. W . Habitual trav el beha viour: Evidence from a six-week trav el diary . T rans portat ion 30 , 13-36 (2003 ). [24] Eagle, N . & Pentland, A. Eigenbe ha viours: Iden tifyin g Structure in Routine . submitt ed to Behavior al Ecolo gy and Sociobiolo gy (2007). [25] Y ook, S.-H., Jeong, H. & Barab ´ asi A.L. Modeling the Internet’ s lar ge-scale topology . Pr oceed ings of the Nat’l Academy of Scienc es 99 , 1338 2-133 86 (2002). [26] Caldarelli, G. Scale-F r ee Networks: Complex W ebs in Natur e and T echnolo gy . (Oxford Univ ersity Press, USA, 2007). [27] Dorogovt se v , S.N. & M endes, J.F .F . Evolution of Networks: F r om Biologi cal N ets to the Internet and WWW . (Oxford Uni versity Press, USA, 2003). [28] Song C.M., Hav lin S. & Makse H.A. Self-si milarity of comple x netwo rks. Natur e 433 , 392-39 5 (2005 ). [29] Gonz ´ alez, M .C., Lind, P .G. & Herrmann, H .J. A system of mobile agents to model social networks . Physical Revie w Letter s 96 , 088702 (2006). [30] Cecconi, F ., Marsili, M., Banav ar , J.R. & Maritan, A. Dif fusio n, pee r p ressu re, and tailed distrib utions. 9 Physical Revie w Letter s 89 , 088102 (2002). 10 FIG. 1: B asic human mobility patter ns . a, W eek-lon g trajecto ry of 40 mobile phone users indicate that most indi viduals trav el only ove r short distances , b ut a few regularl y mov e over hundreds of kilomete rs. Panel b, displays the detailed trajectory of a single user . The dif feren t phone towers are sho w n as green dots, and the V oronoi lattice in grey marks the approximate reception area of each tower . The datas et studie d by us records only the identity of the closest tower to a mobile user , thus we can not identify the positi on of a user within a V oronoi cell. The trajector y of the user sho wn in b is construc ted from 186 two hou rly reports, during w hich the user visited a total of 12 dif ferent locations (tower vic inities ). A mong these, the user is found 96 and 67 occasion s in the two m ost preferr ed locations , the frequenc y of visits for each location being sho wn as a vertical bar . The circle represents the radius of gyration centered in the trajectory’ s center of mass. c, P robabil ity density function P (∆ r ) of tra ve l distances obtained for the two studied datasets D 1 and D 2 . T he solid line indicat es a trun cated po wer law whose paramete rs are pro vided in the text (see E q. 1). d, T he distrib ution P ( r g ) of the radius of gyrati on measured for the users, where r g ( T ) was mea sured after T = 6 months of observ ation. The solid line represent a similar trun cated po wer law fit (see Eq. 2). T he d otted, da shed and dot-d ashed curv es show P ( r g ) o btaine d from th e standard null models ( RW , LF and T LF ), where for the T LF we used the same step size distrib ution as the one measured for the mobile phone users. 11 FIG. 2: Th e bound ed nature of h u man trajectories . a, Radius of gyration , h r g ( t ) i vs time for mobile phone users separated i n three groups acc ordin g to their final r g ( T ) , wher e T = 6 months. The black curves corres pond to the analytical prediction s fo r the random walk models , increasing in time as h r g ( t ) i| LF ,T LF ∼ t 3 / 2+ β (solid ), and h r g ( t ) i| RW ∼ t 0 . 5 (dotte d). T he dashed curves corresp ondin g to a loga rithmic fit of the form A + B ln( t ) , where A and B depe nd on r g . b, Probability density functio n o f indi vidual trav el distance s P (∆ r | r g ) for users with r g = 4 , 10 , 40 , 100 and 200 km. As the inse t sho ws, each group displays a quite dif ferent P (∆ r | r g ) dist rib ution. After rescaling the distan ce and the distrib ution w ith r g (main pane l), the dif ferent curves collaps e. The soli d line (po wer law) is sho wn as a guide to the eye . c, Return probability distrib ution, F pt ( t ) . The prominent peaks capture the tendenc y of humans to regular ly return t o the locat ions the y v isited before, in contrast with the smooth asymptotic behav ior ∼ 1 / ( t ln ( t ) 2 ) (solid li ne) predicted fo r random walks. d, A Zipf pl ot sho wing the frequenc y of vi siting diffe rent l ocatio ns. The symbols c orresp ond to users that ha ve been observed to visit n L = 5 , 10 , 30 , and 50 differe nt location s. Denoting with ( L ) the rank of the loc ation liste d in th e or der of the visit f requen cy , the data is well approximated by R ( L ) ∼ L − 1 . The inset is the s ame plot in line ar scale, illustrat ing that 40% of the time indi viduals are found at th eir first two pre ferred locations. 12 FIG. 3: Th e shape of human trajectori es. a, The probabi lity densit y functio n Φ( x, y ) of fi nding a mobile phone user in a locati on ( x, y ) in the user ’ s intrinsic referen ce frame (see SM for details). The three plots , from left to right, were generated for 10 , 000 users with: r g ≤ 3 , 20 < r g ≤ 30 and r g > 100 km. The traject ories become more anisotr opic as r g increa ses. b, After scalin g each position with σ x and σ y the resulti ng ˜ Φ( x/σ x , y /σ y ) has approx imately the same shape for each group. c, The change in the shape of Φ( x, y ) can be quantified calcula ting the isotrop y ratio S ≡ σ y /σ x as a function of r g , which decrease s as S ∼ r − 0 . 12 g (solid line). Error bars represent the standard error . d, ˜ Φ( x/σ x , 0) represent ing the x-axis cross sectio n of the rescal ed distrib ution ˜ Φ( x/σ x , y /σ y ) sho w n in b .
Original Paper
Loading high-quality paper...
Comments & Academic Discussion
Loading comments...
Leave a Comment