Koszul differential graded algebras and BGG correspondence

The concept of Koszul differential graded algebra (Koszul DG algebra) is introduced. Koszul DG algebras exist extensively, and have nice properties similar to the classic Koszul algebras. A DG version of the Koszul duality is proved. When the Koszul …

Authors: J. -W. He, Q. -S. Wu

K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPON DENCE J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU Abstract. The concept of Koszu l differen tial graded algebra (Koszul DG alge- bra) is introduced. Koszul DG algebras exist extensiv ely , and hav e nice prop er- ties similar to the classic Koszul algebras. A DG v ersion of the Koszul duality is prov ed. When the Koszul DG algebra A is AS-regular, the Ext-algebra E of A is F rob enius. In this case, similar to the classical BGG correspondence, there is an equiv alence b etw een the stable category of finitely generated left E -mo dules, and the quotien t triangulated category of the full triangulated subcategory of the derive d category of ri gh t DG A -mo dules consisting of all compact DG m odules modulo the full triangulated sub category consisting of al l the right DG mo dules with finite dimensional cohomology . The classi cal BGG corresp ondence can be derive d from the DG version. Introduction In his b o ok [Ma] Manin presented an op en question: How to gener alize the Ko szulity to differential g raded (DG for short) algebra s? A ttempts hav e b een made by s e veral authors as in [PP] a nd [Be]. In their terminology , a DG a lgebra is said to b e Ko szul if the underlying gra de d algebra is Koszul. Koszul DG algebras in their sense are applied to dis cuss configura tion spa ces. In this pap er, we take a differe n t p oint of vie w . Let k b e a field. A co nnec ted DG algebra over k is a p os itively gr aded k -alg ebra A = ⊕ n ≥ 0 A n with A 0 = k suc h that there is a differential d : A → A o f degr e e 1 which is also a graded de r iv atio n. A connected DG algebra A is s aid to b e a Koszul D G algebr a if the minimal semifree resolution of the tr ivial DG mo dule A k has a semifree basis co nsisting of ho mogeneous elements o f degr ee zero (Definition 2.1 ). Our definition o f Kos zul DG alg ebra is a natural ge ner alization o f the usual Kos zul alg ebra. As we will s e e in Section 2, a connected gra ded algebra regar ded as a DG a lg ebra with zer o differential is a Ko szul DG algebra if and o nly if it is a Ko szul algebr a in the usual sense. Examples of Koszul DG a lgebras ca n b e found in v ar ious fields. F or example, let M b e a co nnected n -dimensional C ∞ manifold, a nd let ( A ∗ ( M ) = L n i =0 A i ( M ) , d ) b e the de Rham complex of M , then ( A ∗ ( M ) , d ) is a co mm utative DG algebr a and by de Rham theore m ([M]) the 0- th cohomo lo gy group H 0 ( A ∗ ( M )) ∼ = R . Hence the DG alg ebra A ∗ ( M ) has 2000 Mathematics Subje ct Classific ation. Pri mary 16E45, 16E10. Key wor ds and phr ases. Differential graded algebra, Derived category , Koszul algebra, BGG correspondence. 1 2 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU a minimal mo del A ([KM]) or Sulliv a n mo del ([FHT2]), w hich is cer ta inly a connected DG algebra . If the manifold M has so me further prop erties (e.g., M = T n the n - dimensional torus), then the de Rham cohomolo gy alg ebra H ( A ∗ ( M )) is a Ko szul algebra. Hence the cohomo logy algebra o f its minimal mo del (or Sulliv an mo del) A is Kosz ul as A is quas i-isomorphic to A ∗ ( M ). Then A is a K oszul DG algebra by Prop ositio n 2 .3. Mor e exa mples of Koszul DG a lgebra will b e given in Section 2. In fact, we will s ee that a ny Koszul a lgebra c a n b e viewed a s the cohomolo gy algebra of some K oszul DG a lgebra. Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfand in [BGG] established an equiv a lence b etw een the sta- ble categor y of finitely ge ner ated g raded mo dules over the exterio r a lgebra V V with V = k x 0 ⊕ k x 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ k x n , and the b ounded derived categor y of cohere n t sheaves on the pro jective space P n . This e q uiv alence is now ca lle d the BGG c orr esp ondenc e . BGG co r resp ondence has b een generalize d to no ncommutativ e pr o jective g eometry by several authors . Let R b e a (nonco mm utative) Kos z ul alg e bra. If R is AS-r egular, Jørgens en prov ed in [Jo ] that there is a n equiv a lence b etw een the s table catego r y ov er the graded F rob enius alg e bra E ( R ) = E x t ∗ R ( k , k ) and the derived catego ry of the noncommutativ e ana logue QGr( R ) of the quasi- coherent sheaves ov er R ; Mart ´ ınez Villa-Saor ´ ın prov ed in [MS] that the stable catego ry of the finite dimensional mo d- ules over E ( R ) is equiv a lent to the b ounded derived ca tegory of the noncommutativ e analogue qgr R of the coherent sheav es ov er R . Mor i in [Mo] prov ed a similar version under a mor e g eneral condition. O ne of our purp ose s in this pa per is to es tablish a DG version of the BGG cor resp ondence. In some sp ecial case, the DG version of the BGG corres p o ndenc e coincide s with the classical o ne as establis hed in [BGG] and [MS]. The pap er is orga nized as follows. In Section 1, we g ive so me prelimina r ies and fix some notations for the pap er. In Section 2, we first pro p o s e a definition for K oszul DG a lgebras (Definition 2.1), then give some examples a nd discuss some ba sic prop er ties of Koszul DG alg ebras. F o r any connected DG algebra A , we prove that if the cohomolo g y alg ebra H ( A ) is Koszul in the usual sense, then A is a Kos z ul DG alg e bra (Pr o p o sition 2.3). The conv erse is not true in general. In Section 3 , we discuss the structure of the E xt-algebra s of Koszul DG a lgebras. F o r any K o szul DG algebra A , we prove that the E xt-algebra E = Ext ∗ A ( A k , A k ) of A is an aug ment ed, filtered alg ebra. Mor eov er, if H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a, then the asso ciated graded algebr a g r ( E ) is isomor phic to the dual Koszul alge br a ( H ( A )) ! (Theorem 3.3). If further, A k is co mpact, then E is a finite dimensional lo ca l alg ebra; when H ( A ) is Ko szul, the filtratio n on E is exa ctly the J acobson radical filtration (Theorem 3.5). Using ba r and cobar constructions , we prove the following version of the Koszul duality on the E x t-algebra s (Theor em 3.8): Theorem [Koszul Duality on Ext-a lgebra]. Let A b e a Kosz ul DG algebr a a nd E b e its Ex t- a lgebra. If A k is compact, then E xt ∗ E ( E k , E k ) ∼ = H ( A ). K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 3 As a co rollar y , we show that the Ext-a lgebra of a Ko szul DG algebra A with A k compact is s trongly qua si-Koszul ([GM ]) if a nd only if its cohomolo gy a lgebra H ( A ) is a Koszul algebra . In Section 4, by using Lef` evre-Haseg aw a’s theorem in [Le , Ch.2] (see Theo rem 4.1), we esta blish a DG version of K oszul equiv alence and duality (Theorems 4.4 a nd 4.7). Theorem [K oszul equiv a lence and dua lit y]. Let A b e a Ko s zul DG a lgebra and E be its Ext-a lg ebra. Suppo se A k is c o mpact. Then there is a n equiv ale nce of triangu- lated categor ies b etw een D + ( E ) and D + dg ( A op ); a nd there is a duality of tria ngulated categorie s b etw ee n D b (mo d- E op ) a nd D c ( A op ). Here D + ( E ) is the the derived catego ry of b ounded b e low co chain complex e s o f left E -mo dules; D b (mo d- E ) (resp. D b (mo d- E op )) is the b ounded derived categ o ry of finitely gener ated left (resp. right) E -mo dules; D dg ( A op ) (resp. D + dg ( A op )) is the derived categor y of right DG A -mo dules (res p. b ounded b elow rig ht DG A -mo dules ), and D c ( A op ) is the full triangula ted sub category of D + dg ( A op ) consisting of all the compact o b jects. As a corolla ry , we s how that each finite dimensional lo cal algebr a with residue field k can b e viewed as the Ext-a lgebra o f some Koszul DG alg ebra. As a result, we see that the cohomolog y algebr a o f a Ko szul DG alg ebra may not b e Koszul. In Section 5 , we in tro duce the concept of AS-regula r DG algebr a. B ased on the r e- sult obtained in Section 4 , we s how that the Ext-alge br a of an AS-regular Koszul DG algebra is F rob enius (Prop ostion 5.4 and Corolla ry 5.5). W e then prov e a corresp on- dence b etw e e n some quotient catego ry of the derived catego ry of a Ko szul AS-r egular DG algebr a and the stable categor y of its E x t-algebra , which is similar to the classical BGG corres po ndence (Theorems 5.7 a nd 5.8). Theorem [BGG Co rresp ondence]. Let A b e a Koszul DG AS-regula r a lgebra with Ext-algebr a E = Ext ∗ A ( k , k ). Then there is a duality of triangulated c ategories b et ween mo d- E op and D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A op ) and a n eq uiv alence of triangulated categor ies b etw een mo d- E and D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A op ) . Here mo d- E op (resp. mo d- E ) is the stable ca tegory of finitely ge ne r ated right (r esp. left) E - mo dules . D f d ( A op ) is the full triangula ted sub categor y of the derived ca tegory of right DG A -mo dules consisting of all the DG mo dules with finite dimensiona l c o - homology . The r esults ab ove ar e generalized to Adams connec ted DG algebr as in Section 6. W e show that the nonco mm utative BGG corr esp ondence b etw een the tria ng ulated categorie s es tablished in [J o] and [MS] can b e deduced fro m the BGG corr esp ondence on Adams c o nnected DG algebras (Theor em 6.8 ). 4 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU 1. Preliminaries Throughout, k is a fie ld and all algebra s ar e k -algebra s; una dorned ⊗ means ⊗ k and Hom mea ns Hom k . By a gra de d algebr a we mean a Z -gr a ded a lgebra. An augmente d gra ded a lg ebra is a gr aded alg ebra A with an augmentation map ε : A → k which is a gra ded algebra morphism. A p ositively gra ded alge bra A = L n ≥ 0 A n with A 0 = k is called a c onne cte d gr aded algebr a. L e t M and N b e graded A -mo dules. Hom A ( M , N ) is the set o f all graded A -mo dule morphisms. If L is a graded vector space, L # = Hom ( L, k ) is the gr aded vector spa c e dual. By a (co chain) D G algebr a we mean a gra ded algebra A = L n ∈ Z A n with a differ- ent ial d : A → A of deg ree 1, which is also a gr aded deriv ation. An augment e d D G algebr a is a DG a lgebra A such that the under lying g raded alg ebra is augmented with augmentation map ε : A → k s a tisfying ε ◦ d = 0. ker ε is called the augmented idea l of A . A c onne cte d DG a lgebra is a DG algebr a such that the underlying gr aded algebr a is connected. An y grade d alg ebra ca n b e viewed a s a DG alg ebra with differ ent ial d = 0; in this case it is called a DG algebra with trivial differential. Let ( A, d A ) be a DG a lgebra. A left differ en tial gr ade d mo dule over A (DG A - mo dule for s hort) is a left gr aded A -mo dule M with a differential d M : M → M of degree 1 such that d M satisfies the graded L e ibnitz r ule d M ( a m ) = d A ( a ) m + ( − 1) | a | a d M ( m ) for a ll gr aded elements a ∈ A, m ∈ M . A right DG mo dule over A is defined similar ly . W e denote A op as the opp osite DG algebra of A , whose pro duct is defined as a · b = ( − 1) | a |·| b | ba for all graded elements a, b ∈ A . Right DG mo dules ov er A can b e identified with DG A op -mo dules. Dually , by a (co chain) D G c o algebr a we mean a gr aded coa lgebra C = L n ∈ Z C n with a differential d : C → C of degr e e 1, which is als o a g raded co deriv ation. A c o augmente d DG c o algebr a is a DG co a lgebra C with a gra ded coalgebr a ma p η : k − → C , ca lle d coaugmentation ma p, such that d ◦ η = 0 . If C is a coaugmented DG coalgebr a, then C has a decomp osition C = k ⊕ ¯ C , where ¯ C is the kernel of the counit ε C , which is isomor phic to the co kernel e C of η . There is a copro duct ¯ ∆ : ¯ C → ¯ C ⊗ ¯ C defined by ¯ ∆( c ) = ∆( c ) − 1 ⊗ c − c ⊗ 1, such that ( ¯ C , ¯ ∆) is a co a lgebra without counit. ∆ induces a copr o duct e ∆ over e C . ( ¯ C , ¯ ∆) a nd ( e C , e ∆) are isomorphic a s coalg ebras. A coaugmented DG coalg ebra C is c o c omplete if, for any ho mogeneous element x ∈ ¯ C , there is an int eger n such that ¯ ∆ n ( x ) = ( ¯ ∆ ⊗ 1 ⊗ n − 1 ) ◦ · · · ◦ ( ¯ ∆ ⊗ 1 ) ◦ ¯ ∆( x ) = 0. A right DG C -como dule N is a gr aded right C -como dule with a graded co deriv atio n d N (i.e. ρ N d N = ( d N ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ d C ) ρ N ) of degr ee 1. A co co mplete right DG C -co mo dule is defined simila rly ([Le]). K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 5 F o r the s ta ndard facts ab out DG mo dules, semifree mo dules and semifree re s olu- tions of DG mo dules, etc, refer to [AFH] and [FHT2]. A DG A -mo dule M is said to be b ounde d b elow if M n = 0 for n ≪ 0. Let A b e a DG algebr a, M and N b e left DG A -mo dules, W b e a right DG A -mo dule. F ollowing [KM] a nd [W e ], the differential Ext and T o r a re defined as Ext n A ( M , N ) = H n (RHom A ( M , N )) and T o r n A ( W , M ) = H n ( W ⊗ L A M ) for a ll n ∈ Z . Let s b e the susp ensio n map (shifting map) with ( sX ) n = X n − 1 for any co chain complex X . Thus s i : X → s i X is of degr ee i for any i ∈ Z . 1.1. Bar constructions. Let A be a n aug ment ed DG a lg ebra w ith differential d . Let I ( A ) = · · · ⊕ A − 1 ⊕ ¯ A 0 ⊕ A 1 ⊕ · · · b e its a ugmented ideal. Let B ( A ) = T ( s − 1 ( I ( A ))) = k ⊕ s − 1 ( I ( A )) ⊕ s − 1 ( I ( A )) ⊗ s − 1 ( I ( A )) ⊕ [ s − 1 ( I ( A ))] ⊗ 3 ⊕ · · · . The homogeneo us element s − 1 a 1 ⊗ s − 1 a 2 ⊗· · ·⊗ s − 1 a n of B ( A ) is written as [ a 1 | a 2 | · · · | a n ] for ho mogenous ele ments a 1 , · · · , a n ∈ I ( A ). The co pr o duct ∆ : B ( A ) → B ( A ) ⊗ B ( A ) is defined by ∆([ a 1 | a 2 | · · · | a n ]) = 1 ⊗ [ a 1 | a 2 | · · · | a n ] + [ a 1 | a 2 | · · · | a n ] ⊗ 1 + P 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 [ a 1 | · · · | a i ] ⊗ [ a i +1 | · · · | a n ] , and define a counit ε : B ( A ) → k by ε | k = 1 k and ε ([ a 1 | · · · | a n ]) = 0 for n ≥ 1 . It is easy to check that ( B ( A ) , ∆ , ε ) is a co augmented gra ded coalge bra. Define δ 0 : B ( A ) → B ( A ) by δ 0 ([ a 1 | · · · | a n ]) = − n X i =1 ( − 1) ω i [ a 1 | · · · | d ( a i ) | · · · | a n ] , and define δ 1 : B ( A ) → B ( A ) b y δ 1 ([ a 1 ]) = 0 and δ 1 ([ a 1 | · · · | a n ]) = n X i =2 ( − 1) ω i [ a 1 | · · · | a i − 1 a i | · · · | a n ] , where ω i = P j 0 . A DG A -mo dule is semifr e e if and only if it has a semibas is ([AFH, P rop osition 2.5]). W e now give a definition of the K o szulity for DG algebra s. Definition 2.1. A connected DG algebra A is called a left Koszu l DG algebra if the trivial DG mo dule A k has a minimal semifree resolution ε : P → A k such that the semibasis of P consists of ele ments of degr ee zero . Rig ht Koszul DG algebra is defined similar ly . The next pro po sition tells us that a connected DG alg ebra is left Ko szul if and only it is right Kos zul. Prop ositio n 2.2. L et A b e a c onne cte d DG algebr a. The fol lowing stat emen t s ar e e quivalent. (i) A is a left Koszul DG algebr a; (ii) Ext n A ( A k , A k ) = 0 for al l n 6 = 0 ; K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 9 (iii) T or n A ( k A , A k ) = 0 for al l n 6 = 0 ; (iv) A is a right Koszul DG algebr a. Pr o of. Using the minimal semifree reso lution of the trivial mo dule.  Let R b e a co nnected graded a lgebra. Supp os e that · · · → Q n → · · · → Q 1 → Q 0 → R k → 0 is a minimal free resolution of the trivia l mo dule R k . If we consider R as a DG algebra with triv ia l differential, and view · · · → Q n → Q n − 1 → · · · as a do uble co mplex by using the sign tr ick, then the asso cia ted total complex (that is , Q 0 ⊕ Q 1 [ − 1] ⊕ · · · ⊕ Q n [ − n ] ⊕ · · · ) is a minimal semifree res olution of the trivia l DG mo dule R k . Therefor e R is a Koszul algebra in the usua l sense if and only if it is a K oszul DG a lg ebra with trivial differential. Prop ositio n 2.3. L et A b e a c onne cte d D G algebr a. If t he c ohomolo gy algebr a H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a, then A is a Koszul DG algebr a. Pr o of. W e use the Eilenberg- Mo ore sp ectral sequence ([FHT2], [KM]) E p,q 2 = T o r p,q H ( A ) ( k , k ) = T o r H ( A ) − p ( k , k ) q = ⇒ T or p + q A ( k , k ) , where q is the grading induced by the gr adings on H ( A ) a nd H ( A ) k . This is a conv er- gent b ounded be low cohomolo gy sp ectral sequence. Since H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a , E p,q 2 = 0 for p + q 6 = 0. Thus T or n A ( k , k ) = 0 for all n 6 = 0.  Before pro ceeding to discuss further prop erties of Koszul DG alg ebras, we give so me examples here. Example 2. 4. L et A b e the gr ade d algebr a k h x, y i / ( y 2 , y x ) , wher e | x | = | y | = 1 . L et d ( x ) = xy and d ( y ) = 0 . Then d induc es a differ ential d over A and A is a DG algebr a. It is not har d to che ck that H ( A ) = k ⊕ k y , which is a Koszul algebr a. Henc e by Pr op osition 2.3, A is a Koszul DG algebr a. The following example shows that Koszul DG algebr as with nontrivial differ ent ials exist extensively . Example 2. 5. Each Koszul algebr a R is the c ohomolo gy algebr a of a c ert ain Koszul DG algebr a with nontrivial differ ential. In fact, R c an b e viewe d as a c onne cte d DG algebr a with a trivial differ ential. Then by L emma 1.4 , Ω B ( R ) is quasi-isomorphic to R as DG algebr as. Henc e H (Ω B ( R )) ∼ = H ( R ) ∼ = R . Cle arly Ω B ( R ) is a c onne cte d DG algebr a with a nontrivial differ ential. By Pr op osition 2.3, Ω B ( R ) is a K oszu l DG algebr a. The converse of Prop o s ition 2.3 is not true, as we will see at the end of Section 4. How ev er we hav e the following prop os itio n. 10 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU Prop ositio n 2.6. L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a. If the glob al dimension gldim H ( A ) ≤ 2 , then H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a. Pr o of. Let Q • : 0 − → Q 2 − → Q 1 − → H ( A ) − → k − → 0 be a minimal free res olution o f the trivial mo dule H ( A ) k . It is direct to chec k that in this cas e the E ilenberg-Mo or e reso lution ([FHT2], [KM]) of the trivial DG mo dule A k arising from Q • can b e chosen to b e minimal. If A is Koszul, then the minimal free resolution Q • m ust b e linea r a nd hence H ( A ) is Ko s zul.  The Koszulity o f DG a lgebras is pres erved under tak ing qua si-isomor phisms. Lemma 2.7. [KM, Pro p o s ition 4.2] L et A and B b e D G algebr as. If t her e is a quasi-isomorphi sm of DG algebr as f : A − → B , then t he r est riction of f induc es an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories f ∗ : D ( B ) − → D ( A ) with the inverse functor B ⊗ L A − . The same is tru e for D ( B op ) and D ( A op ) .  Prop ositio n 2. 8. L et A and B b e c onne cte d DG algebr as. Supp ose that ther e is a quasi-isomorphi sm of DG algebr as f : A − → B . If A (r esp. B ) is a Koszul DG algebr a, then so is B (r esp. A ). Pr o of. If A is a Koszul DG algebra , then Ext n A ( A k , A k ) = 0 for a ll n 6 = 0, that is, Hom D ( A ) ( A k , A k [ n ]) = 0 for all n 6 = 0. Hence Hom D ( B ) ( B k , B k [ n ]) ∼ = Hom D ( A ) ( f ∗ ( B k ) , f ∗ ( B k )[ n ]) = Hom D ( A ) ( A k , A k [ n ]) = 0 for a ll n 6 = 0. Hence Ext n B ( B k , B k ) = 0 for all n 6 = 0, a nd B is Ko s zul.  3. The Ex t-algebra of a Koszul D G algebra In this section, we study the structure of the Ext-a lg ebra of a Ko szul DG algebra . W e pr ov e a version of the Koszul duality on Ext- a lgebra for Kosz ul DG algebr as. Let P b e a semifree DG A -mo dule with a semifre e filtration 0 ⊆ P (0) ⊆ P (1) ⊆ · · · ⊆ P ( n ) ⊆ · · · . W e may adjust the semifree filtration of P to get a st andar d filtr ation of P a s in the following. Let E be a semifree basis o f P . Then as a gr aded A -mo dule, P = A ⊗ k E , where k E = ⊕ e ∈ E k e is a graded k -vector s pace. Set inductively , V ≤ 0 = V (0 ) = { v ∈ k E | d ( v ) = 0 } and F (0) = A ⊗ V (0) ⊆ P , V ≤ 1 = { v ∈ k E | d ( v ) ∈ F (0) } and F (1) = A ⊗ V ≤ 1 ⊆ P, V ≤ n = { v ∈ k E | d ( v ) ∈ F ( n − 1) } and F ( n ) = A ⊗ V ≤ n ⊆ P. Let V ( n ) be a s ubspace of V ≤ n such that V ≤ n = V ≤ n − 1 ⊕ V ( n ). Then for any 0 6 = v ∈ V ( n ), d ( v ) ∈ F ( n − 1 ) \ F ( n − 2) . K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 11 Obviously , ∪ n ≥ 0 F ( n ) = P a nd F ( n ) /F ( n − 1) ∼ = A ⊗ V ( n ) is a free DG mo dule ov er a basis of co cycles. Hence 0 ⊆ F (0) ⊆ F (1) ⊆ · · · ⊆ F ( n ) ⊆ · · · is a new semifree filtr ation on P , which is c alled the standar d semifr e e filtr ation o f P asso ciated to the semibasis E . As we will see in nex t example, the standar d semifree filtration de p ends on the choice of the semibasis. Example 3.1. Let A b e a connected DG algebra such that there is an element a ∈ A 1 with d A ( a ) 6 = 0 . Let P = Ae 0 ⊕ Ae 1 as a graded free A -mo dule with deg ( e i ) = i for i = 0 , 1. Define d ( e 0 ) = 0 and d ( e 1 ) = d A ( a ) e 0 . Then P is a semifree DG A - mo dule with a semifree filtration P : 0 ⊆ P (0) ⊆ P (1) = P where P (0 ) = Ae 0 and P (1) = Ae 0 ⊕ Ae 1 = Ae 0 ⊕ A ( e 1 − a e 0 ) = P . Then E = { e 0 , e 1 } and E ′ = { e 0 , e 1 − ae 0 } are t wo semibas is of the semifree DG mo dule P . Asso ciated to the s emibasis E , the standard filtration is the o riginal o ne P : 0 ⊆ P (0) ⊆ P (1) = P. Asso ciated to the semiba sis E ′ , the standa r d filtra tio n is F : 0 ⊆ F (0) = Ae 0 ⊕ A ( e 1 − a e 0 ) = P . The main reason to in tro duce the standar d filtration is that DG morphism pr eserves the standard filtra tion as in the following lemma, which is needed in the pr o of of Theorem 3.3. Lemma 3 . 2. L et A b e a c onne cte d DG algebr a, M and N b e minimal semifr e e DG A -mo dules with the s t andar d filtr ation 0 ⊆ M (0) ⊆ M (1) ⊆ · · · and 0 ⊆ N (0) ⊆ N (1) ⊆ · · · r esp e ctively. If t he semib asis of M and N c onsist of elements of de gr e e 0, then any DG mo dule m orphism f : M → N pr eserves the filt r ation. Pr o of. Assume that ther e ar e gra ded vector spaces U ( i ) a nd W ( i ) fo r i ≥ 0 such that M ( i ) / M ( i − 1) = A ⊗ U ( i ) and N ( i ) / N ( i − 1) = A ⊗ W ( i ). F or any u ∈ U (0), f ( u ) ∈ ⊕ i ≥ 0 W ( i ) and d ( f ( u )) = 0 since f is a co chain map. Let f ( u ) = v i 0 + · · · + v i t with 0 6 = v i j ∈ W ( i j ) for 0 ≤ j ≤ t a nd i 0 < i 1 < · · · < i t . Supp ose that t ≥ 1 . By the definition of standard filtration of N , d ( v i j ) ∈ N ( i j − 1) and d ( v i j ) / ∈ N ( i j − 2). How ev er, 0 = d ( f ( u )) = d ( v i 0 + · · · + v i t ) = d ( v i 0 + · · · + v i t − 1 ) + d ( v i t ) . It follows that d ( v i t ) = − d ( v i 0 + · · · + v i t − 1 ) ∈ N ( i t − 1 − 1 ) ⊆ N ( i t − 2 ), a co nt radiction. Hence t = 0 and f ( u ) ∈ W (0), which implies f ( M (0)) ⊆ N (0). Now supp ose f ( M ( n )) ⊆ N ( n ). Let ¯ M = M / M ( n ) and ¯ N = N / N ( n ). Then f induces a DG morphism ¯ f : ¯ M → ¯ N . ¯ M a nd ¯ N ar e minimal semifree mo dules with 12 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU standard semifr e e filtration ¯ M (0) = M ( n + 1) / M ( n ) ⊆ ¯ M (1) = M ( n + 2) / M ( n ) ⊆ · · · and ¯ N (0) = N ( n + 1) / N ( n ) ⊆ ¯ N (1) = N ( n + 2 ) / N ( n ) ⊆ · · · resp ectively . B y the previo us narra tives, we hav e ¯ f ( ¯ M (0)) ⊆ ¯ N (0), which in turn implies f ( M ( n + 1)) ⊆ N ( n + 1 ).  Theorem 3. 3 . L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a. Then (i) the Ext-algebr a E = Ext ∗ A ( A k , A k ) of A is an augmente d algebr a; (ii) ther e is a filtr ation F : E = F 0 ⊇ F 1 ⊇ · · · ⊇ F n ⊇ · · · on E such that E is a filt er e d algebr a. Mor e over, if H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a, then the asso ciate d gr ade d algebr a g r F ( E ) is isomorphi c to t he dual Koszul algebr a ( H ( A )) ! . Pr o of. (i) and the first par t of (ii) may b e prov ed by us ing the bar constructio n of A . W e g ive a direct pro of here for later use. Let ε : P − → A k b e a minimal semifree resolutio n of the triv ial DG mo dule A k . Suppo se that 0 ⊆ P (0) ⊆ P (1) ⊆ · · · ⊆ P ( n ) ⊆ · · · is a standa rd semifree filtra tion of P ass o ciated to so me s emibasis. W e hav e g raded vector spa ces V (0) , V (1) , · · · , V ( n ) , · · · such that P (0) = A ⊗ V (0) and P ( n ) /P ( n − 1) = A ⊗ V ( n ) for all n ≥ 1. By the minimality o f P , it is easy to see that V (0) = k . Since A is Ko szul, E = E xt ∗ A ( A k , A k ) = E xt 0 A ( A k , A k ) = Y i ≥ 0 V ( i ) ∗ = k ⊕ Y i ≥ 1 V ( i ) ∗ . Define a decr easing filtra tion F on E by F : F 0 = E and F n = Y i ≥ n V ( i ) ∗ for n ≥ 1 . W e claim that E is a filtered algebra with this filtration. F or a ny x ∈ F n = Q i ≥ n V ( i ) ∗ and y ∈ F m = Q i ≥ m V ( i ) ∗ , we still use x to denote the corr esp onding DG mo dule morphism x : P / P ( n − 1) − → A k , a nd y the cor resp onding DG mo dule mor phism y : P / P ( m − 1 ) − → A k . Since P /P ( n − 1) is semifree, there is a DG mo dule morphis m f x : P /P ( n − 1) − → P such tha t ε ◦ f x = x ([AFH, Lemma 6.5.3 ]. Let g b e the comp osition P π − → P /P ( n − 1) f x − → P , where π is the natura l pr o jection map. By Le mma 3 .2, f x preserves the filtratio n, hence g ( P ( n − 1)) = 0 and g ( P ( n + i )) ⊆ P ( i ) for all i ≥ 0 . Let h b e the c o mpo sition P π − → P /P ( m − 1) y − → k . K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 13 By definition, the pr o duct y · x in the a lgebra E is the restr iction of h ◦ g to L i ≥ 0 V ( i ). Since h ◦ g ( P ( n + m − 1)) ⊆ h ( P ( m − 1)) = 0, it follows that y · x ∈ Q i ≥ n + m V ( i ) ∗ . Hence E is a filtered a lgebra with filtra tion { F n } . Define a map ǫ : E − → k by ǫ | k = id k and ǫ | F 1 = 0. Since F 1 is an ideal, ǫ is a n algebra morphism, hence an augmentation map. (i) is prov ed. Now we prove the second part of (ii). Suppo s e that H ( A ) is a Ko szul algebr a. The trivial H ( A )-mo dule H ( A ) k has a linear pro jective r esolution · · · − → H ( A ) ⊗ V ′ ( n ) δ n − → · · · δ 2 − → H ( A ) ⊗ V ′ (1) δ 1 − → H ( A ) ⊗ V ′ (0) δ 0 − → H ( A ) k − → 0 . The Eilenberg - Mo ore r esolution ([FHT2, Pr op osition 20.1 1]) P ′ of the DG mo dule A k ar ising from the pr evious resolutio n o f H ( A ) k is minimal. Hence P ∼ = P ′ as DG A -mo dules since A is connected and then V ( i ) ∼ = V ′ ( i ) as vector spac e s for all i ≥ 0. F o r conv enience, we identify V ( i ) with V ′ ( i ) for all i ≥ 0 a nd P with P ′ . By the construction of the filtration F on E , we get F n /F n − 1 ∼ = V ( n ) ∗ for a ll n ≥ 0. Hence we hav e (1) g r F ( E ) ∼ = M n ≥ 0 V ( n ) ∗ ∼ = Ext ∗ H ( A ) ( k , k ) as graded vector spa ces. Pick elements x ∈ V ( n ) ∗ and y ∈ V ( m ) ∗ . As we know, x and y c a n be extend to b e DG mo dule maps (also denoted by x a nd y resp ectively) P / P ( n − 1 ) x − → A k and P /P ( m − 1) y − → A k . As b efore, there are filtration-pr eserving DG mo dule mo rphisms f x : P /P ( n − 1) − → P and f y : P /P ( m − 1) − → P such that ε ◦ f x = x a nd ε ◦ f y = y . Let g b e the comp osition of the DG mo dule morphisms g : P π − → P /P ( n − 1) f x − → P π − → P /P ( m − 1) y − → k . Then the pro duct y · x ∈ V ( n + m ) ∗ of x and y in g r F ( E ) is the restric tio n of g to V ( n + m ). Since it is filtration-pr eserving, f x induces a mor phism of sp ectral sequences E p,q ∗ ( f x ) : E p,q ∗ ( P / P ( n − 1)) − → E p,q ∗ ( P ) . In particular, E p,q 1 ( P / P ( n − 1)) = H p + q A ⊗ V ( n − p ) and E p,q 1 ( P ) = H p + q A ⊗ V ( − p ) for all p ≤ 0 and p + q ≥ 0. Now we reg ard x ∈ V ( n ) ∗ and y ∈ V ( m ) ∗ as elements in Ext ∗ H ( A ) ( k , k ). Let h − p = L p ≥− q E p,q 1 ( f x ). Then we g et a commutativ e diag ram / / H ( A ) ⊗ V ( n + m ) h m   δ n + m / / · · · δ n +2 / / H ( A ) ⊗ V ( n + 1) h 1   δ n +1 / / H ( A ) ⊗ V ( n ) h 0   η x $ $ I I I I I I I I I I / / 0 / / H ( A ) ⊗ V ( m ) η y   δ m / / · · · δ 2 / / H ( A ) ⊗ V (1) δ 1 / / H ( A ) ⊗ V (0) δ 0 / / k / / 0 k where η x and η y are graded H ( A )-mo dule morphisms induced by x a nd y . T o avoid the p ossible co nfusion, we temp orar ily denote the Y o neda pro duct on Ex t ∗ H ( A ) ( k , k ) by y ∗ x . By the de finitio n of Y oneda pro duct, y ∗ x is equal to the restrictio n of 14 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU η y ◦ h m to V ( n + m ). Let τ m : L m i =0 V ( i ) → V ( m ) be the pro jection map. F or any v ∈ V ( n + m ), η y ◦ h m ( v ) = η y  E − ( n + m ) ,n + m 1 ( f x )( v )  = η y ◦ τ m ◦ f x ( v ) = g ( v ) . Hence y ∗ x = y · x , that is , the pro ducts on g r F ( E ) and Ext ∗ H ( A ) ( k , k ) coincide under the isomor phism in (1). Since H ( A ) is Ko szul, Ext ∗ H ( A ) ( k , k ) ∼ = ( H ( A )) ! . Hence g r F ( E ) ∼ = ( H ( A )) ! .  Let A b e a connected DG algebra . When the trivial mo dule A k lies in D c ( A ), the DG a lgebra A usua lly has go o d prop er ties. The following pro p o s ition is clear . Prop ositio n 3.4. L et A b e a c onne cte d DG algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) and H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a, then gldim H ( A ) < ∞ .  Theorem 3. 5 . L et A b e a c onne cte d D G algebr a. Supp ose A k ∈ D c ( A ) . (i) If A is a Koszu l DG algebr a, then the Ex t-algebr a E = Ext 0 A ( A k , A k ) is a finite dimensional lo c al algebr a with E /J = k , wher e J is t he Jac obson r adic al of E . (ii) If H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a, then g r ( E ) = ( H ( A )) ! , wher e g r ( E ) is the gr ade d algebr a asso ciate d with the ra dic al filtr ation of the lo c al algebr a E . Pr o of. W e use the nota tions in the pro of of Theorem 3.3. (i) Since A k ∈ D c ( A ), there is an integer m such that P ( m ) / P ( m − 1) 6 = 0 and P ( i ) /P ( i − 1 ) = 0 for a ll i > m . Hence the filtra tio n F : E = F 0 ⊇ F 1 ⊇ F 2 ⊇ · · · stops at the m -th step. By Theorem 3.3, E is a filtered alg ebra, hence for x ∈ F 1 , x m +1 = 0. Thus E is a lo ca l alg ebra with Jaco bson ra dic a l J = F 1 and E /J ∼ = k . (ii) If H ( A ) is a Ko szul algebra, then by Pro po sition 3 .4, gldim H ( A ) < ∞ . Assume that gldim H ( A ) = n . Then the filtration F stops at the n -th s tep, and J n +1 = 0. By Theorem 3.3, g r F ( E ) ∼ = ( H ( A )) ! . If we can s how J i = F i for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n , then we a re done. Since V ( j ) = 0 for j ≥ n + 1, E = k ⊕ V (1) ∗ ⊕ · · · ⊕ V ( n ) ∗ and F i = L n j = i V ( j ) ∗ . By Theorem 3.3, g r F ( E ) is gener ated in deg r ee 1, so ( F 1 ) n = F n = V ( n ) ∗ , that is, J n = F n . Similarly , since V ( n ) ∗ = J n ⊆ J n − 1 , V ( n − 1 ) ∗ ⊆ ( F 1 ) n − 1 + V ( n ) ∗ = J n − 1 and F n − 1 = V ( n − 1) ∗ ⊕ V ( n ) ∗ ⊆ J n − 1 . On the other hand, J n − 1 ⊆ V ( n − 1) ∗ ⊕ V ( n ) ∗ . Hence F n − 1 = J n − 1 . An easy induction shows tha t J i = F i for a ll 1 ≤ i ≤ n .  W e nex t pr ov e a theor em similar to the K oszul duality for K o szul algebr as [BGS]. Let A be an aug ment ed DG algebra , and let R = B ( A ) b e its bar construction. Lemma 3.6 . [FHT2, P . 272] The map ϕ : R # − → E nd A ( A ⊗ R ) define d by ϕ ( f )(1[ a 1 | · · · | a n ]) = n X i =0 ( − 1) | f | ω i 1[ a 1 | · · · | a i ] f ([ a i +1 | · · · | a n ]) is a quasi-isomorphism of DG algebr as, wher e ω i = | a 1 | + · · · + | a i | − i .  K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 15 Lemma 3.7. L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a and E b e its Ext-algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , then E # is a c o augmente d c o algebr a and ther e is a quasi-isomorphism of DG algebr as ψ : Ω( E # ) − → A. Pr o of. Let R = B ( A ) b e the bar constr uction o f A . Then R is a coaugmented DG coalgebr a, and is concentrated in non-nega tive degre es. The graded vector space dual R # is a n aug ment ed DG alg ebra. It follows from Lemma 1 .4 and Lemma 3.6 that E ∼ = H (End A ( A ⊗ R )) ∼ = H ( R # ). Since A is Ko szul, E is co ncentrated in deg ree zero . The last isomor phism implies that H i ( R ) = 0 for all i > 0. Then there is natura lly a quasi-isomo rphism of coaugmented DG coalgebr as Z 0 ( R ) − → R , which induces a quasi-iso morphism of augmented DG algebras R # − → ( Z 0 ( R )) # . Therefore E ∼ = H ( R # ) ∼ = ( Z 0 ( R )) # as augmented alge br as. Since A k ∈ D c ( A ), E is a finite dimensional alg ebra. Hence E # ∼ = Z 0 ( R ) as coaug ment ed co algebra s, a nd there is a quasi-isomo rphism o f c o augmented DG co algebra s E # − → R. This induces a quasi-iso morphism of DG algebra s ξ : Ω( E # ) − → Ω( R ) = Ω B ( A ) . There is also a quas i-isomorphism o f DG alg ebras ζ : Ω B ( A ) − → A by Lemma 1.3. Hence the comp osition (2) Ω( E # ) ξ − → Ω B ( A ) ζ − → A gives a q uasi-isomor phism o f DG alg ebras ψ = ζ ◦ ξ : Ω( E # ) − → A . The pro o f is completed.  Theorem 3.8 (Koszul Duality on Ext-alg ebra) . L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a and E b e its Ext -algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , t hen Ext ∗ E ( E k , E k ) ∼ = H ( A ) . Pr o of. By Lemma 3.6, Ω( E # ) = B ( E ) # is qua si-isomor phic to E nd E ( E ⊗ B ( E )). Hence Ext ∗ E ( E k , E k ) ∼ = H (E nd E ( E ⊗ B ( E ))) ∼ = H (Ω( E # )) . It fo llows from Lemma 3.7 that Ex t ∗ E ( E k , E k ) ∼ = H ( A ).  As an application of Theor em 3.8, we have the following tw o coro llaries, which establish rela tions b etw een K oszul DG algebr as and (strong ly ) quasi- Koszul a lgebras. Corollary 3.9. L et A b e a Koszul D G algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , then the fol lowing ar e e quivalent: (i) The Ext -algebr a E of A is a quasi-Koszul algebr a; (ii) H ( A ) is gener ate d in de gr e e 1. 16 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU Pr o of. By The o rem 3.5, E is a finite dimensional lo cal algebra with the residue field k . The equiv alence of (i) and (ii) follows fro m Theore m 3.8 a nd [GM, Theo rem 4 .4 ].  Corollary 3.10. L et A b e a Koszul D G algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , then the fol lowing ar e e quivalent: (i) The Ext -algebr a E of A is a str ongly quasi-Koszul algebr a; (ii) H ( A ) is a Koszul algebr a. Pr o of. (i) ⇒ (ii). By [GM, Theor em 6.1 ] a nd its pro of, Ext ∗ E ( E k , E k ) is a Kos zul algebra. Theorem 3.8 implies that H ( A ) ∼ = Ext ∗ E ( E k , E k ) is a Koszul a lgebra. (ii) ⇒ (i). Applying Theo rem 3.8 a gain, Ext ∗ E ( E k , E k ) ∼ = H ( A ) is a Koszul algebra. By [GM, Theo rem 9 .1], E is a strong ly quasi-K oszul alge bra.  4. Koszul Dual ity Let B be an augmented DG algebra and C be a coaugmented DG coalgebra . Lef` evre-Hasegaw a ([Le, Pro p o s ition 2.2.4 .1]) establis he d an equiv alence b et ween the derived categor y D ( B ) a nd the so called co derived ca tegory D ( C ) when B and C satisfy certain c o nditions. Thank s for the result of Lef` evre-Hasegawa we ca n prove a version o f Kos zul Duality ([BGS]) for Ko s zul DG alge br as. Let ( B , m B , d B ) be an a ugmented DG alg ebra with a n augmentation map ε B : B → k , and ( C, ∆ , d C ) b e a coaugmented DG coalgebr a with a c oaugmentation map η C : k → C . A gr aded linear map τ : C → B of degree 1 is called a twisting c o chain from C to B ([HMS], [Le]) if ε B ◦ τ ◦ η C = 0 , and m B ◦ ( τ ⊗ τ ) ◦ ∆ + d B ◦ τ + τ ◦ d C = 0 . Let Ω( C ) b e the c o bar constructio n of C . The twisting co chains from C to B a re one to one c o rresp onding to the DG a lgebra morphisms from Ω( C ) to B . There is a c anonic al t wisting c o chain τ 0 : C → Ω( C ) given by τ 0 ( c ) = [ c ] for any c ∈ ¯ C a nd τ 0 ( k ) = 0. Let τ : C → B be a t wisting co chain. F or any right DG C -co mo dule N , the twiste d tensor pr o duct N ⊗ τ B ([Le], [K e2]) is the rig h t DG B -mo dule defined by (i) N ⊗ τ B = N ⊗ B as a rig ht gr aded B -mo dule; (ii) the differential δ = d N ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ d B + (1 ⊗ m B )(1 ⊗ τ ⊗ 1)( ρ N ⊗ 1 ) , i.e. δ ( n ⊗ a ) = d ( n ) ⊗ a + ( − 1) | n | n ⊗ d ( a ) + X ( n ) ( − 1) | n (0) | n (0) ⊗ τ ( n (1) ) a, for a ny homo geneous elements n ∈ N and a ∈ B . K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 17 Dually , for any DG B - mo dule M , the twiste d t ensor pr o duct M ⊗ τ C is the r ight DG C -c omo dule defined by (i) M ⊗ τ C = M ⊗ C as a vector space; (ii) the differe ntial δ = d M ⊗ 1 + 1 ⊗ d C − ( m M ⊗ 1 )(1 ⊗ τ ⊗ 1)(1 ⊗ ∆), i.e. δ ( m ⊗ c ) = d ( m ) ⊗ c + ( − 1) | m | m ⊗ d ( c ) − X ( c ) ( − 1) | m | mτ ( c (1) ) ⊗ c (2) , for a ny homo geneous elements m ∈ M and c ∈ C . Let DGmo d- B be the categ ory of r ight DG B -mo dules a nd DGcom- C be the cate- gory of right DG C -como dules. Then there is a pa ir o f a djoint functor s ( L, R ) ([Ke2], [Le]): DGcom- C L = −⊗ τ B − − − − − − → ← − − − − − − R = −⊗ τ C DGmod- B . Let C b e a co complete DG coalg ebra, and DGcomc- C b e the categor y o f co complete right DG C -como dules. F or any M , N ∈ DGcomc- C , a DG como dule mo rphism f : M → N is called a we ak e quivalenc e rel ate d t o τ ([Ke2],[Le]) if L ( f ) : L M → LN is a quasi-iso morphism. Note that a weak equiv alence r elated to τ 0 ( B = Ω( C )) is a quasi-isomo rphism. B ut the conv erse is not tr ue in gener al ([Ke 2]). Let K ( C ) b e the homotopy category o f DGcomc- C . Equipp ed with the natura l exact triangles, K ( C ) is a triangulated ca tegory . Let W b e the c lass of weak equiv alences in the categor y K ( C ). Then W is a multiplicativ e sy stem. The co derived categ ory D dg ( C ) of C is defined to be K ( C )[ W − 1 ], the lo ca lization o f K ( C ) a t the class W of weak equiv a lences ([K e 2], [Le]). Le t D dg ( B op ) b e the derived catego ry o f r ight DG B -mo dules. The following theorem is prov ed by Lef` evre-Hasegawa in [Le, Ch.2], a nd also ca n be found in [Ke2]. Theorem 4.1. L et C b e a c o c omplete DG c o algebr a, B an augmen t e d DG algebr a and τ : C → B b e a twisting c o chain. Then the fol lowing ar e e quivalent: (i) The map τ induc es a quasi-isomorphism Ω( C ) → B ; (ii) The adjunction map B ⊗ τ C ⊗ τ B → B is a quasi-isomorphism; (iii) The fun ctors L and R induc e an e quivalenc e of t riangulate d c ate gories (also denote d by L and R ) D dg ( C ) L ⇄ R D dg ( B op ) .  Now let A be a Koszul DG a lgebra. Supp ose A k ∈ D c ( A ). By Theore m 3 .5, its E xt- algebra E is a finite dimensio nal lo cal alg ebra with the r esidue field k . Hence the vector space dual E ∗ = E # is a c oaugmented coa lgebra which is of co urse co complete. Hence all the DG E ∗ -como dules ar e co complete. Let C = E ∗ and B = Ω( C ). Clearly , B is 18 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU a co nnected DG algebra , and the ca nonical twisting co chain τ 0 : C → Ω( C ) s atisfies the condition (i) in the Theorem 4.1. Hence we hav e the following equiv a lence of triangulated ca tegories D dg ( E ∗ ) L ⇄ R D dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) . Let D + dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) b e the derived catego ry o f a ll b o unded b elow r ight DG Ω( E ∗ )- mo dules, that is, consis ting of ob jects M with M n = 0 for n ≪ 0. Since Ω( E ∗ ) is connected, it is not hard to see that D + dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) is a full triangulated sub c ategory of D dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ). Similarly , let K + dg ( C ) b e the homotopy ca tegory of b ounded b elow DG co complete como dules , and let D + dg ( E ∗ ) b e the lo caliza tion of K + dg ( E ∗ ) at the clas s of weak equiv alences W + in K + dg ( E ∗ ) ( W + is als o a multiplicativ e system). O ne can chec k that D + dg ( E ∗ ) is a full triangulated sub categ ory of D dg ( E ∗ ). Restr icting L and R to the sub catego r ies D + dg ( E ∗ ) a nd D + dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) r esp ectively , we get the following prop osition. Prop ositio n 4. 2. L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a and E b e its Ext -algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , t hen the fol lowing is an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories D + dg ( E ∗ ) L ⇄ R D + dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) .  Since E ∗ is concentrated in degree zer o, a DG E ∗ -como dule is exa ctly a co chain complex of E ∗ -como dules. Hence K + dg ( E ∗ ) = K + ( E ∗ ), the homotopy ca teg ory of bo unded b elow co chain complexes o f right E ∗ -como dules. It is not har d to see that the class W + of weak equiv a lences related to τ 0 is ex actly the cla s s of quasi-iso morphisms. Hence D + dg ( E ∗ ) = K + dg ( E ∗ )[( W + ) − 1 ] = D + ( E ∗ ), the derived categor y of b ounded below co chain co mplexes o f right E ∗ -como dules. By P rop osition 4.2 we hav e the following pro po sition. Prop ositio n 4. 3. L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a and E b e its Ext -algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , t hen ther e is an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories (we use the same nota- tions of the e quivalent functors as in Pr op. 4.2.) D + ( E ∗ ) L ⇄ R D + dg (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) .  Since E is a finite dimensional algebra , the categ ory of left E - mo dules is isomor phic to the categor y of right E ∗ -como dules ([Mo n, 1 .6 .4]). Hence there is an equiv alence of tria ngulated ca tegories D + ( E ) F ⇄ G D + ( E ∗ ) , where D + ( E ) is the der ived categor y of b ounded b elow c o chain complexes of le ft E -mo dules. K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 19 By Lemma 3.7, there is a quas i-isomorphism of DG algebr a ϕ : Ω( E ∗ ) − → A . Hence by Lemma 2.7, the following gives an equiv alence o f tr ia ngulated categ ories D + ( A op ) ϕ ∗ − − − − − − − → ← − − − − − − − −⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A D + (Ω( E ∗ ) op ) . Let Φ = ( − ⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A ) ◦ L ◦ F and Ψ = G ◦ R ◦ ϕ ∗ . W e hav e the following theor e m. Theorem 4.4 (Ko szul Equiv alence) . Le t A b e a Koszul DG algebr a and E b e its Ext-algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , t hen we have an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories D + ( E ) Φ − → ← − Ψ D + dg ( A op ) . It is easy to s ee tha t Φ( E k ) = L ( k E ∗ ) ⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A = Ω( E ∗ ) ⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A = A A . T em- po rarily write h E k i the full triangula ted sub c ategory of D + ( E ) genera ted by E k . By restricting Φ and Ψ, we get a n equiv alence o f tr ia ngulated categorie s h E k i Φ res − − → ← − − − Ψ res D c ( A ) . Lemma 4.5. h E k i = D b (mo d- E ) , wher e mo d- E is the c ate gory of fin itely gener ate d left E - mo dules. Pr o of. It suffices to show that a ll the finitely g enerated E -mo dules ar e in h E k i . Since E is finite dimensional, any finitely g e nerated E -mo dule is finite dimensional. Clearly , all 1-dimensiona l mo dules are in h E k i . Let N b e a finite dimensional mo dule. Since so c(N) 6 = 0, we have an exact sequence 0 − → E k − → N − → N / E k − → 0 . Since dim N / E k < dim N , an induction o n the dimension of N implies that N lies in h E k i . Hence all finitely genera ted E -mo dules are in h E k i .  Corollary 4 .6. L et A b e a Koszul D G algebr a and E b e its Ext-algebr a. If A k ∈ D c ( A ) , t hen we have an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories D b (mo d- E ) Φ res − − → ← − − Ψ res D c ( A op ) . Since E is finite dimensional, the vector space dual ( ) ∗ induces a duality of trian- gulated catego ries D (mo d- E ) ( ) ∗ − − → ← − − ( ) ∗ D (mo d- E op ) . Now, we ar e able to give a version of the Koszul duality for K oszul DG a lgebras. Theorem 4.7 (Kos zul Duality) . L et A b e a Koszu l DG algebr a and E b e its Ext- algebr a. Supp ose A k ∈ D c ( A ) . Then ther e is a duality of triangulate d c ate gories D b (mo d- E op ) F − → ← − G D c ( A op ) . 20 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU It is easy to s ee that (3) F ( k E ) = Φ( E k ) = A A and F ( E E ) = Φ( E E ∗ ) = L (( E ∗ ) E ∗ ) ⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A ( a ) ∼ = k Ω( E ∗ ) ⊗ L Ω( E ∗ ) A ∼ = k A , (4) where the iso morphism ( a ) holds, b eca use L (( E ∗ ) E ∗ ) = Ω( E ∗ ; E ∗ ) which is quas i- isomorphic to k Ω( E ∗ ) as a DG Ω( E ∗ )-mo dule by the narra tive b elow Lemma 1 .5. F r om the pro o f of ab ove results, we hav e proved in fact the following result. Corollary 4.8. L et R b e a finite dimensional lo c al algebr a with the r esidue fi eld k . Then ther e is a duality of triangulate d c ate gories D b ( R op ) ⇄ D c (Ω( R ∗ ) op ); and u nder this duality, t he trivial mo dule k R c orr esp onds to Ω( R ∗ ) and R R to k Ω( R ∗ ) .  The following corolla ry was indicated in [Ke2] a nd [Le]. As an application of Corol- lary 4.8, we give a pro of here. Corollary 4.9. L et R b e a finite dimensional lo c al algebr a with the r esidue fi eld k . Then t he c onne cte d DG algebr a Ω( R ∗ ) is a Koszul DG algebr a. Mor e over, t he Ex t- algebr a Ext ∗ Ω( R ∗ ) ( k , k ) is isomorphic t o R . Pr o of. By Corollar y 4 .8, k Ω( R ∗ ) is compact, and Ext n Ω( R ∗ ) op ( k , k ) = Hom D c (Ω( R ∗ ) op ) ( k , k [ − n ]) ∼ = Hom D b ( R op ) ( R [ n ] , R ) = 0 if n 6 = 0. Ther efore Ω( R ∗ ) is a Ko szul DG algebra . Moreover, the following a re algebra isomorphisms Ext ∗ Ω( R ∗ ) ( k , k ) ∼ = Ext ∗ Ω( R ∗ ) op ( k , k ) op ∼ = Ext ∗ R op ( R, R ) ∼ = R.  In pa r ticular, by Corollar y 4.9, if k is algebr a ically closed, then any finite dimen- sional lo ca l alg e br a can b e viewed as the Ext-algebr a of some Koszul DG algebra . Example 4.1 0. No w let V = k x ⊕ k y ⊕ k z and R = T ( V ) /T ≥ 4 ( V ). Clear ly , R is a finite dimensional lo ca l algebra . Then B = Ω( R ∗ ) is a Kosz ul DG algebra with Ext ∗ B ( B k , B k ) = R . Since g r ( R ) ∼ = R is not a Ko s zul alg e bra, s o R is not a strongly quasi-Ko szul alg ebra. By Cor ollary 3.10, the coho mology H ( B ) ca n not be a Koszul algebra. Hence the conv erse of Pro po sition 2.3 is not true. K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 21 5. BGG correspond ence In [BGG], Bernstein-Gelfand-Gelfa nd established an equiv a lence o f ca tegories grmo d-Λ( V ) ∼ = D b (Coh P n ) where grmo d-Λ( V ) is the stable categ ory of finitely genera ted gra ded mo dules over the exterior algebra Λ( V ) of a n ( n + 1)-dimensional space V = k x 0 ⊕ k x 1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ k x n , and D b (Coh P n ) is the b o unded derived c a tegory of coher ent sheav es over the n -dimensio nal pro jective space P n . This equiv alence is now called the BGG c orr esp ondenc e in liter- ature. A sketc h o f the pro of of the BGG corre s po ndence ca n b e found a ls o in [GMa, P .273, Ex.1 ]. The BGG corr e spo ndence ha s b een g eneralized to noncommutativ e pro- jective geometry by several a utho r s ([Jo], [MS], [Mo]). Let R b e a Kos zul no etheria n AS-Gorenstein algebr a with finite g lobal dimensio n. Then its Ext-a lgebra E ( R ) is a F r ob enius algebr a ([Sm]). A version of the no ncommut ative BGG corr e spo ndence was prov ed in [MS], which was sta ted as grmo d- E ( R ) ∼ = D b (qgr R op ) , where grmo d- E ( R ) is the stable ca tegory of finitely ge ne r ated graded mo dules ov er E ( R ) and qgr R op is the quotient ca tegory grmo d- R op / tors R op . Le t D b f d (grmo d- R op ) be the full s ubca tegory of D b (grmo d- R op ) co nsisting o f o b jects X with finite dimen- sional cohomolo g y g roups. It is well known that ([Mi]) D b (qgr R op ) = D b (grmo d- R op ) / D b f d (grmo d- R op ) . Hence the ab ov e BGG corre s po ndence can be stated as (5) grmo d- E ( R ) ∼ = D b (grmo d- R op ) / D b f d (grmo d- R op ) . In this sec tio n, we deduce a cor resp ondence similar to (5) for AS-Gorenstein Kos zul DG algebr as. First of all we recall the definition of AS-Gor enstein DG a lgebra. Let A b e a connected DG a lgebra. W e say that A is right AS-Gor enstein (AS stands fo r Artin- Schelt er) if RHom A op ( k , A ) ∼ = s n k for s o me integer n ([FHT1], [LP WZ],[LPWZ2]); A is right AS-r e gular if A is right AS-Gorenstein and k A ∈ D c ( A op ). Similarly , w e define left AS-Gorenstein DG algebra and left AS-re gular algebra . W e call A is AS- Go renstein (resp., regula r) if A is b oth left and r ig ht AS-Gor enstein (res p., reg ular). Prop ositio n 5.1. L et A b e a c onne cte d D G algebr a. If t he c ohomolo gy algebr a H ( A ) is a left AS -Gor enst ein algebr a, t hen A is a left A S -Gor enst ein DG algebr a. Pr o of. Consider the Eilenberg -Mo ore sp ectral sequence ([KM]) E p,q 2 = Ext p H ( A ) ( k , H ( A )) q = ⇒ E x t p + q A ( k , A ) where the index p in Ext p H ( A ) ( k , H ( A )) q is the us ual homologica l degr ee and q is the grading induced from the g radings of A k and H ( A ) . If the cohomo lo gy sp ectral 22 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU sequence is r e g ular, then it is complete convergen t ([W e]). If H ( A ) is AS-Gorenstein, then by definition there exist so me integers d and l such tha t Ext n H ( A ) ( k , H ( A )) =    0 n 6 = d k [ l ] n = d. Then it is ro utine to see that Ext n A ( k , A ) =    0 n 6 = d + l k n = d + l . Hence RHom A ( k , A ) ∼ = s n k for n = d + l .  W e don’t know whether the conv erse o f Pr op osition 5.1 is true o r not. If A is a connected gra ded algebra, viewed a s a DG algebra with trivial differential, then A is an AS-Go renstein DG alg ebra if a nd only if A satisfies AS-Gorenstein condition in the usual s e nse. The AS-Go renstein pr op erty is inv aria n t under quas i- isomorphism. Prop ositio n 5.2 . L et f : A → A ′ b e a qu asi-isomorph ism of c onne ct e d DG algebr as. Then A is left AS-Gor enstein (AS-re gular) if and only if A ′ is. Pr o of. The pr o of is s imilar to that of P rop osition 2 .8.  Lemma 5.3 . L et A b e an AS-r e gu lar DG algebr a. Su pp ose RHom A op ( k , A ) ∼ = s l k for some inte ger l . L et P → k A b e a minimal semifr e e reso lution of k A with a semifr e e filtr ation 0 ⊆ P (0) ⊆ P (1) ⊆ · · · ⊆ P ( n ) such that P ( n ) = P and P ( n ) / P ( n − 1) 6 = 0 . Then P ( n ) /P ( n − 1) = A [ − l ] . Pr o of. There are finite dimensional gr aded vector s pa ces V (0) , V (1) , · · · , V ( n ) such that P ( i ) /P ( i − 1) = V ( i ) ⊗ A for all 0 ≤ i ≤ n ( P ( − 1) = 0 ). As graded A - mo dules P = L n i =0 V ( i ) ⊗ A . Hence Hom A ( P, A ) = L n i =0 A ⊗ V ( i ) # as gr aded left A -mo dules. Let { x 1 , · · · , x t } be a homogene o us bas is o f V ( n ). Let d b e the differential of Hom A ( P, A ) induced by the differentials of P and A . F or a n y 1 ≤ s ≤ t , define a graded r ight A -mo dule mor phism f s : P = ⊕ n i =0 V ( i ) ⊗ A − → A by sending x s to the identit y of A , x j to zero for j 6 = s , and se nding V ( r ) to zero for all r < n . One ca n see that f 1 , · · · , f t so defined are co cycles of the co chain complex Hom A ( P, A ). Since P is minima l, d ( g )( x j ) = ( d A g − ( − 1) | g | g d P )( x j ) ∈ A ≥ 1 for any homogeneous element g ∈ Hom A ( P, A ) and x j . Hence a ny f j (1 ≤ j ≤ t ) ca n not b e a cob oundary . By hypothesis RHo m A op ( k , A ) ∼ = s l k , which force s dim V ( n ) = 1 and the degree o f no n-zero elements in V ( n ) is − l , that is , P ( n ) /P ( n − 1) ∼ = s − l A .  The following prop ositio n is a sp ecial ca se o f [LPWZ2, Theor em 9.8 ]. Prop ositio n 5. 4. L et A b e a K oszu l DG algebr a with Ext -algebr a E = Ext ∗ A ( k , k ) . Then A is right AS-r e gular if and only if E is F r ob enius . K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 23 Pr o of. Supp o se that A is right AS-r egular. Then k A ∈ D c ( A op ), which is equiv a lent to A k ∈ D c ( A ). Hence E is finite dimensional. Since A is Koszul, RHom A op ( k , A ) ∼ = k by Lemma 5 .3. By Theo rem 4 .7, Ext n E op ( k , E ) = Hom D b (mo d- E op ) ( k , E [ − n ]) ∼ = Hom D c ( A op ) ( F ( E ) , F ( k )[ − n ]) ∼ = Hom D c ( A op ) ( k , A [ − n ]) = Ext n A op ( k , A ) . Hence Ext n E op ( k , E ) = 0 for n 6 = 0. Let 0 − → E E − → I 0 − → I 1 − → · · · be a minimal injective res o lution of E E . Since E is finite dimens io nal and lo ca l, a ll the injective mo dules I n ’s are finite dimensio nal. Hence 0 = Ext n E op ( k , A ) ∼ = socI n for all n ≥ 1, and Hom E op ( k , E ) = k . W e get I n = 0 fo r a ll n ≥ 1 a nd I 0 = E ∗ . Ther e fore we hav e a r ight E - mo dule isomorphism E ∼ = E ∗ , that is, E is a F rob enius algebr a. Conv ersely , if E is F rob enius, then it is finite dimensional, and hence k A ∈ D c ( A op ). Since E itself is injective a nd loca l, it follows Ext n E op ( k , E ) = 0 for n ≥ 1 and Ext 0 E op ( k , E ) = k . Hence Ext n A op ( k , A ) ∼ = Ext n E op ( k , E ) = 0 for n 6 = 0 and E xt 0 A op ( k , A ) ∼ = k . Then RHom A op ( k , A ) ∼ = k , and hence A is AS-r egular.  In [LPWZ2, Theor e m 9 .8], a more general ca se of the ab ove pr o p o sition is prov ed with s ome lo ca lly finite conditions. Corollary 5.5. L et A b e a Koszul DG algebr a. Then A is right AS-r e gular if and only if A is left AS- re gular. Pr o of. Note that E op ∼ = Ext ∗ A op ( k , k ) .  Next we ar e going to deduce a re sult similar to the cla ssical BGG co rresp ondence. Lemma 5.6. L et A b e a c onne ct e d DG algebr a such that k A ∈ D c ( A op ) . Then the ful l triangulate d su b c ate gory h k A i of D c ( A op ) gener ate d by k A , is e qual to D f d ( A op ) , the ful l sub c ate gory of D c ( A op ) c onsisting of DG mo dules M such that dim H ( M ) < ∞ . Pr o of. F or any DG mo dule M , temp ora rily we write ℓ ( M ) = sup { i | H i ( M ) 6 = 0 } − inf { i | H i ( M ) 6 = 0 } and λ ( M ) = sup { i | M i 6 = 0 } − inf { i | M i 6 = 0 } . W e prov e the lemma by an induction on ℓ ( M ). Let M be a DG A -mo dule with dim H ( M ) < ∞ . Without los s of generality , we may assume that H i ( M ) = 0 for i < 0 or i > n for n = ℓ ( M ). Since A is connected, by s uitable trunca tions, we may as s ume that M is concentrated in degrees 0 ≤ i ≤ n. If ℓ ( M ) = 0, then M is isomorphic in D c ( A op ) to a DG mo dule N with λ ( N ) = 0, which is a direct sum of finite c o pies o f k A , and hence is in h k A i . Now supp ose that ea ch DG mo dule M with 24 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU dim H ( M ) < ∞ and ℓ ( M ) < n is in h k A i . If M is a DG mo dule with dim H ( M ) < ∞ and ℓ ( M ) = n , without lo ss o f generality , we may assume M 0 6 = 0 a nd M n 6 = 0, and M i = 0 for i < 0 and i > n . Then the vector space M n has a decomp os itio n M n = d ( M n − 1 ) ⊕ K for some subspace K . Since dim H ( M ) < ∞ , then dim K < ∞ . T a king K as a DG A -mo dule concentrated on degree ze r o, then we have an exact sequence of DG mo dules 0 − → s n K − → M − → M /s n K − → 0 . Now ℓ ( s n K ) = 0 a nd ℓ ( M /s n K ) ≤ n − 1. B y the induction hypothesis, b oth s n K a nd M /s n K ar e ob jects in h k A i , a nd hence M is in h k A i . Therefore h k A i = D f d ( A op ).  Theorem 5.7 (BGG Corr esp ondence) . L et A b e a Koszul D G AS-r e gular algebr a with Ext-algebr a E = Ext ∗ A ( k , k ) . Then ther e is a duality of triangulate d c ate gories mo d- E op ⇄ D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A op ) . Pr o of. By the Koszul Duality (Theorem 4.7), There is a dua lity of triangula ted cate- gories D b (mo d- E op ) ⇄ D c ( A op ); and under this duality the ob ject E E ∈ D b (mo d E op ) is cor resp onding to the ob ject k A ∈ D c ( A op ) by (4). Hence ther e is a duality D b (mo d- E op ) / h E E i ⇄ D c ( A op ) / h k A i , where h E E i is the full tr ia ngulated sub category o f D b (mo d- E op ) generated by E E . Since E is a finite dimensiona l lo cal algebra with E /J ( E ) ∼ = k (Theorem 3.5), all finitely gener a ted pro jective E - mo dules are free. Ther efore h E E i = D b (pro j E op ), where pro j E op is the catego ry of a ll finitely genera ted rig h t pro jective E -mo dules. Hence D b (mo d- E op ) / h E E i = D b (mo d- E op ) / D b (pro j E op ) . By P rop osition 5 .4, E is F rob enius, and hence ([Be 1 ]) D b (mo d- E op ) / D b (pro j E op ) ∼ = mo d- E op . On the o ther hand, by Lemma 5.6 D c ( A op ) / h k A i = D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A ) . In summar y , there is an a duality of triangulated c a tegories mo d- E op ⇄ D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A op ) .  Since E is finite dimensional, ther e is a n equiv alence form of the BGG Corres po n- dence. Theorem 5. 8. L et A b e a Koszul D G AS-r e gular alge br a with Ext-algebr a E = Ext ∗ A ( k , k ) . Then ther e is an e quivalenc e of t riangulate d c ate gories mo d- E ∼ = D c ( A op ) / D f d ( A op ) . K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 25 6. BGG correspond ence on Adams connected DG algebras Many examples of the DG algebr a fr o m algebra ic geometry and algebraic top ology admit an extra grading . Let A = ⊕ i,j ∈ Z A i j be a bigra ded spa ce. An element a ∈ A i j is of degree ( i, j ). The second gr a ding is usually called A dams gr ading ([K M], [LPWZ]). A DG algebr a ( A, d ) is called a DG a lgebra with Adams grading if A is bigraded a nd the differential d is of degree (1 , 0) (i.e., d prese r ves Adams gr ading). A DG mo dule ov er a DG algebra with Adams g rading is bigra ded and the differential preser ves the second grading. A DG algebr a A with Adams grading is augmente d if there is a n augmentation map ε : A → k of degree (0 , 0). A DG algebra with Ada ms gr a ding A is sa id to b e A dams c onne cte d if (1) A i j = 0 fo r i < 0 or j < 0, and (2 ) A 0 0 = k , A 0 j = 0 and A i 0 = 0 for i, j 6 = 0. All Adams connected DG alg ebras ar e augmented. Similarly , we define coaug men ted DG coa lgebras with Adams gr ading. In this section, all the DG alg e br as and DG coalg ebras inv olved ar e with Adams grading. F o r simplicity , we call a DG algebra (coalgebr a) with Adams gr ading an A dams DG algebr a (c o algebr a) . It is no t har d to see that the bar (cobar ) construction (see Section 1) of an (a ) (co)augmented Adams DG algebr a (coalg ebra) is an Adams DG coalgebr a (algebr a). The canonical twisting co chain (see Section 4) τ 0 from a co co mplete Adams DG co al- gebra C to Ω( C ) is of degree (1 , 0). Let A b e an Adams DG a lg ebra, and let AC dg ( A ) ( AC dg ( A op )) b e the category of left (right) DG A -mo dules with morphisms o f degr ee (0 , 0). W e use s i = [ i ] to de no te the i -th shift functor on the first gra ding and use s − j = ( j ) to denote the j -th shift functor on the Adams gra ding. Let AD dg ( A ) b e the derived catego ry of AC dg ( A ). Denote AD c ( A ) ( AD c ( A op )) a s the full tria ngulated sub catego ry of AD dg ( A ) ( AD dg ( A op )) generated by A A ( A A ). Let M and N be o b jects in AC dg ( A ), we us e E xt i,j A ( M , N ) = Hom AD dg ( A ) ( M , N [ − i ]( j )) to denote the der ived functor . Then E xt ∗ , ∗ A ( M , N ) = M i,j ∈ Z E xt i,j A ( M , N ) is a bigr aded space. In particular , if A is an augmented Adams DG algebr a, then E = E xt ∗ , ∗ A ( k , k ) is a bigr aded algebr a. F o r conv enience, we usually write E i j = E xt i,j A ( k , k ). The results obtained in previous se ctions can b e easily g eneralized to Adams DG algebras . Hence in this section, we only state the r esults without giving pro ofs. More general re sults can b e found in [LPWZ2, Sec tion 10], with some lo ca lly finite condi- tions. Let A b e an Adams co nnected DG alg ebra and M be a bo unded b elow DG mo dule ov er A . Then there is a minima l semifree resolutio n (the co nstruction is s imilar to [KM, Theorem IV.3.7]) P → M in AC dg ( A ) (see a lso [MW]). 26 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU Definition 6.1 . Let A b e a n Adams connected DG algebra . It is called a Ko szul Adams DG alg e bra if E xt i, ∗ A ( k , k ) = L j ∈ Z E xt i,j A ( k , k ) = 0 for a ll i 6 = 0. It is not hard to see that, if A is a Kos z ul Adams DG algebr a , then its Ext-a lgebra E = E xt ∗ , ∗ A ( k , k ) has the prop er ty that E i j = 0 for i 6 = 0 or j > 0. Hence E is a negatively g raded alg ebra. Comparing with Theorem 3.3, we have the following. Prop ositio n 6.2. L et A b e a Koszul A dams DG algebr a, and let S j = E 0 − j . Then S = ⊕ j ≥ 0 S j is a c onne cte d gr ade d algebr a. If in addition A k ∈ AD c dg ( A ) , t hen S is a finite dimensional gr ade d algebr a. W e a lso have the following for m of Lef` evre-Haseg aw a’s Theore m. Theorem 6.3. L et C b e a c o c omplete A dams DG c o algebr a, B an augmen t e d A dams DG algebr a and τ : C → B is a twisting c o chain of de gr e e (1 , 0) . The fol lowing ar e e quivalent (i) The map τ induc es a quasi-isomorphism Ω( C ) → B ; (ii) The adjunction map B ⊗ τ C ⊗ τ B → B is a quasi-isomorphi sm; (iii) Ther e is an e quivalenc e of triangulate d c ate gories AD dg ( C ) ⇄ AD dg ( B op ) wher e AD dg ( C ) is the c o derive d c ate gory over the c o c omplete A dams DG al- gebr a C .  If A k ∈ AD c ( A ), then E is finite dimensio nal, and hence the gr aded vector space dual E # is finite dimensional c o algebra . By applying the a b ove theo rem and notice that a DG como dule over the Adams DG co algebra E # is exactly a co mplex of graded como dules over E # , we have the following prop o s ition which is analog ous to Theo rem 4.7. Prop ositio n 6.4. L et A b e a Koszul A dams D G algebr a. If A k ∈ AD c ( A ) , then ther e is a duality of triangulate d c ate gories D b (grmo d- E op ) F − → ← − G AD c ( A op ) .  It is conv enient for us to dea l with the p ositively gr aded a lgebra S , rather than the nega tively graded a lgebra E . The ab elian ca tegory grmo d- E op is eq uiv alent to grmo d- S op of finitely gener a ted right S -mo dules. W e hav e the following Kosz ul dua lit y theorem of Adams DG alg ebras. K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 27 Theorem 6 . 5. L et A b e a K oszul A dams DG algebr a. L et S b e the gr ade d algebr a such that S j = E xt 0 , − j A ( k , k ) . If A k ∈ AD c ( A ) , t hen ther e is a duality of triangulate d c ate gories D b (grmo d- S op ) ψ − → ← − φ AD c ( A op ) .  T o es ta blish a version of the BGG cor resp ondence, we need the concept of AS- Gorenstein Adams DG algebra which is first intro duced in [LPWZ]. Definition 6.6. Let A b e an Adams connected DG alge br a. It is ca lled an AS - Gor enstein Adams DG algebr a if RHom A op ( k , A ) ∼ = k [ r ]( s ). Moreover if k A ∈ AD c ( A op ), then A is called a n AS- r e gular Adams DG alg ebra. The following prop os itio n is pr ov ed in [LPWZ] by using A ∞ -algebra . Also one can give a pr o of by using Theo rem 6 .5. Prop ositio n 6.7 . L et A b e a Koszul A dams DG algebr a. Then A is A S-r e gular if and only if its Ext-algebr a E is F r ob enius. Now we can state the BGG cor resp ondence on Adams DG algebra s. Theorem 6 .8. L et A b e a K oszu l AS-r e gu lar A dams DG algebr a and S b e the c on- ne ct e d gr ade d such that S j = E xt 0 , − j A ( k , k ) . Then ther e is an duality of t riangulate d c ate gories (6) grmo d- S op ∼ = AD c ( A op ) / AD f d ( A op ) , wher e AD f d ( A op ) is the fu l l triangulate d sub c ate gory of AD c ( A op ) c onsisting of obje ct s M such that dim H ( M ) < ∞ . Now let R be a no ether ian connected gra ded alge br a. Let A b e the Adams con- nected DG algebr a with trivial differential by taking A i i = R i and A i j = 0 if i 6 = j . If R is a K oszul algebr a, then it is not ha r d to see that A is a Koszul Adams DG alg e- bra. Moreov er, E xt 0 , − j A ( k , k ) = R ! j for all j ≥ 0, i.e., S = R ! = E ( R ) = E x t ∗ R ( k , k ). Suppo se that gl . dim R < ∞ . Then S = E ( R ) is finite dimensional. Since E ( R ) is finite dimensional gr mo d- E ( R ) op is dual to grmo d- E ( R ). Hence D b (grmo d- S op ) = D b (grmo d- E ( R ) op ) is dual to D b (grmo d- E ( R )). Le t us inspe c t the categor y AD c ( A op ) in Theor em 6 .5. Since the differential of A is trivia l and A is co nc e n trated in the di- agonal of the first quadra nt, the triangulated c a tegory AD dg ( A op ) is naturally equiv a - lent to the der ived catego r y D (Grmo d- R op ) of the categ ory Grmo d- R of right g raded R -mo dules. Under this equiv alence, A A is co rresp onding to R R in D (Grmo d- R op ). Hence AD c ( A op ) is equiv alen t to the full triangula ted sub c a tegory o f D (Grmo d- R op ) generated by R R (closed under the shifts on the grading o f R R ), which is equiv alent to D b (pro j R op ) , the b ounded derived ca teg ory o f finitely gener ated gra ded pro jective right R -mo dules. Since R is no etheria n and has finite glo bal dimensio n, D b (pro j R op ) is eq uiv alent to D b (grmo d- R op ) , the b ounded de r ived categor y o f finitely g enerated 28 J.-W. HE AND Q.-S. WU graded rig ht R - mo dules . In summary we have the equiv alence (which is established in [BGS]) of tria ngulated ca tegories if R is no etheria n and o f finite g lobal dimension D b (grmo d- E ( R )) ∼ = D b (grmo d- R op ) . Moreov er, we a ssume tha t R is a no etherian Ko szul AS-r egular a lgebra. Then the Adams connected DG algebr a A is Koszul Adams AS-re gular DG a lgebra. Hence in the left hand of (6), grmo d- S op is dua l to grmo d- E ( R ). Since AD c ( A op ) is equiv a- lent to D b (grmo d- R op ), the full triang ula ted sub category AD f d ( A op ) is equiv alen t to D b f d (grmo d- R op ), the triangulated s ubca tegory consisting o f ob jects X such that H X is finite dimensiona l. Hence in the r ight hand o f (6), AD c ( A op ) / AD f d ( A op ) ∼ = D b (grmo d- R op ) / D b f d (grmo d- R op ) which is equiv a le n t to D b (qgr R op ) by [Mi]. In s ummary we get the BGG co rresp on- dence esta blished in [MS ] grmo d- E ( R ) ∼ = D b (qgr R op ) . Ackno wledgments This r e search is supp o rted by the NSF C (key pro ject 10 3310 3 0) a nd supp or ted by the Cultiv ation F und o f the Key Scientific and T echnical Innov ation Pro ject (No. 70400 4), Do ctor ate F oundation (No. 200 60246 003), Ministry of Educatio n of China. References [AFH] L. L. Avramov, H.- B. F oxb y and S. Hal p eri n, Di ffer etial Homological algebra, manuscript. [AZ] M. Artin and J. J. Zhang, Nonc ommutative pr oje ctive schemes , Adv. Math. 109 (1994), 228- 287. [Be1] A. Beligiannis, The homolo gic al the ory of c ontr avariantly finite sub c ate gories: Ausland er- Buchweitz c ontexts, Gor enstein c ate g ories and (c o-)stablization , Comm. Al gebra 2 8 (2000), 4547-4596. [Be] R. Bezruk a vniko v, Koszul DG- algeb r as arising fr om c onfigur ation sp ac es , Geom. F unct. Anal, 4 (1994), 119-135. [BGG] I. N. Bernstein, I. M. Gelfand and S. I. Gelfand, Algebr aic bund les over P n and pr oblems in line ar algebra , F unct. Anal. Appl. 12 (1979), 212-214. [BGS] A. A . Beilinson, V. Ginzburg and W. Soergel, Koszul duality p atterns in r epr esentation the ory , J. Am er. Math. So c. 9 (1996), 473-527. [FHT1] Y. F´ elix, S. Hal peri n and J.-C. Thomas, Gor enstein sp ac es , Adv. M ath. 71 (1988), 92-112. [FHT2] Y. F´ elix, S. Halp erin and J.-C. Thomas, Rational Homotop y Theory, GTM 205 , Spri nger- V erlag, New Y ork, 2001. [GM] E. L. Green and R. Mart ´ ınez Vill a, Koszul and Y one da algebr as , Canad. Math. Soc. Conference Pro ceedings 18 (1996), 247-297. [GMa] S. I. Gelfand and Y. I. Manin, Methods of Homological algebra, Spr i nger-V erlag, 1997. [HMS] D. Husemoll er, J. C. Mo ore and J. Stasheff, Differ ential homolo gic al algebr a and homo gene ous sp ac es , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 5 (1974), 113-185. [Jo] P . Jørgensen, A nonc ommuta tive BGG co rr esp ondenc e , Pac ific J. Math. 21 8 (2005), 357-377. [Ke1] B. Keller, Deriving DG c ate gories , Ann. s cien t. ´ Ec. Norm. Sup., 4 s´ erie, 27 (1994), 63-102. K OSZUL DIFFERENTIAL GRADED ALGEBRAS AND BGG CORRESPONDENCE 29 [Ke2] B. Keller, Koszul duality and c o derived c ate gories , prepri nt, 2003. [KM] I. K ˇ r ´ ıˇ z and J. P . May , Op e r ads, algebr as, mo dules and motives , Ast´ erisque 23 3 , 1995. [Le] K. Lef` evre-Hasega w a, Sur les A ∞ -Cat´ egories , Universit ´ e Paris 7, Th´ ese de Do ctorat, 2003. [LPWZ] D.-M Lu, J. H. Palmieri, Q.- S. W u and J. J. Zhang, A ∞ -algebr as for ring t he orists , Alg. Collo q. 1 1 (2004), 91-128. [LPWZ1] D.- M. Lu, J. H. Palmieri, Q.-S. W u, J.J. Zhang, Artin-Schelte r Regular Algebras of Di- mension 4 and Their - Ext-Algebras, Duk e Math. J. 137 (2007), 537-584. [LPWZ2] D.- M. Lu, J. H. Palmieri, Q. - S. W u, J.J. Zhang, K oszul Equiv al ences in A ∞ -algebras, preprint (2007). [Ma] Y. I. Manin, Quant um Groups and Noncomm utativ e Geometry, Universit ´ e de Montr ´ eal, Centre de Rec herc hes Math ´ ematiques, Montreal, QC, 1988. [Mar] R. Mar t ´ ınez Vi lla, Koszul algebr as and she aves over pr oje ctive sp ac e , arXiv:math.R T/0405538. [MS] R. Mart ´ ınez Vi lla and M. Saor ´ ın, Koszul e quivalenc e and dualities , Pacific J. M ath. 214 (2004), 359-378. [Mi] J.I. M iya chi, L o c alization of triangulate d c ate gories and derived c ate gories , J. Al gebra 141 (1991), 463-483. [Mon] S. Montgo mery , Hopf algebras and their actions on r ings, CBM S Regional Conference Series in Mathematics 82 , Providenc e, RI, 1993. [Mo] I. Mori, Riemann-R o ch like the or em for triangulate d c ate gories , J. Pure Appl. Al gebra 193 (2004), 263-285. [M] S. Mori ta, Geometry of Di fferetial F orms, T r ansl. Math. Monographs 2 01 , Ameri can Mathemat- ical So ci ety , Providence, RI, 2001. [MW] X.- F. Mao and Q.- S. W u, Homolo gica l Invariants for Conne ct e d DG Algebr as , to app ear in Comm. Algebra. [PP] A. Polishc h uk and L. Positselski, Quadratic Algebras, Universit y Lecture Series 3 7 , A merican Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 2005. [Pr] S. Pri ddy , Koszul r esolutions , T rans. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (1970), 39-60. [Sm] S. P . Smith, Some finite dimensional algebr as r elate d to el liptic curves , CMS Conf. Pro c. 19 (1996), 315-348. [W e] C. W eibel, An In tro duction to Homological A lgebra, Cambridge Universit y Press, Cambridge, 1994. Institute of Mat hema tics, Fudan University, S hanghai 2004 33, China E-mail addr ess : hejw@fudan. edu.cn Institute of Mat hema tics, Fudan University, S hanghai 2004 33, China E-mail addr ess : qswu@fudan. edu.cn

Original Paper

Loading high-quality paper...

Comments & Academic Discussion

Loading comments...

Leave a Comment